Category:Facilitation: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(130 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is a page to explore the facilitation of learning and inquiry, and of organizational life, to enhance whole person development, participation and collaboration.
{{RightTOC}}
=Introduction=


''This is where we explore the facilitation of learning and inquiry, and of organizational life, to enhance whole person development, participation and collaboration.''


== John Heron on Facilitation ==


A short extract from Chapter 1 "Dimensions and Modes of Facilitation" of John's book ''The Complete Facilitator's Handbook'', London, Kogan Page, 1999. The dimensions introduced below are discussed in detail in later chapters.
The motto of this section is:


'''The six dimensions of facilitation'''
'''Getting Better at Working Together!''' ''We now have all the tools necessary to make communities work''.


1. ''The planning dimension''. This is the goal-oriented, ends and means, aspect of facilitation. It is to do with the aims of the group, and what programme it should undertake to fulfil them. The facilitative question here is: how shall the group acquire its objectives and its programme?
or, in slightly more complex terminology: '''From a recognition of [[Equipotentiality]], to a practice of [[Coliberation]]''', the advance of any of us to the ability to engage in peer to peer relationships is dependent on the ability of all.


2. ''The meaning dimension''.  This is the cognitive aspect of facilitation. It is to do with participants' understanding of what is going on, with their making sense of experience, and with their reasons for doing things and reacting to things. The facilitative question is: how shall meaning be given to and found in the experiences and actions of group members?
Peer to peer, as a distributed mode of organization and way of thinking, expresses itself not only in  a technological infrastructure, but also in modes of organization, and in ways to stimulate social processes that are congruent with it. There is a emergence of a wide variety of dialogical techniques to ellicit collaboration and collective intelligence. While this section mostly focuses on the human-relational aspect of facilitation, it will also monitor technological enablers to this process.


3. ''The confronting dimension''. This is the challenge aspect of facilitation. It is to do with raising consciousness about the group's resistances to and avoidances of things it needs to face and deal with. The facilitative question is: how shall the group's consciousness be raised about these matters?
'''Inspired by the work of [[Dana Klisanin]], the P2P Foundation favors the development of [[Evolutionary Guidance Media]] which posits the pairing of compassionate-seeing/action with that of [[Cyberception]], or humankind’s rapidly advancing technological abilities, resulting in [[Transception]]''', [http://danaklisanin.com/research/evolutionary-guidance-media/]


4. ''The feeling dimension''.  This is the sensitive aspect of facilitation. It is to do with the management of feeling and emotion within the group. The facilitative question is: how shall the life of feeling and emotion within the group be handled? The vital distinction between feeling and emotion is discussed in Chapter 3.


5. ''The structuring dimension''. This is the formal aspect of facilitation. It is to do with methods of learning, with what sort of form is given to learning within the group, with how is it to be shaped. The facilitative question is: how can the group's learning be structured?
Not all relevant entries from the P2P Encyclopedia have been ported here yet: only material from A to C.


6. ''The valuing dimension''.  This is the integrity aspect of facilitation. It is to do with creating a supportive climate which honours and celebrates the personhood of group members; a climate in which they can be genuine, empowered, disclosing their reality as it is, keeping in touch with their true needs and interests.  The facilitative question is: how can such a climate of personal value, integrity and respect be created?
The P2P facilitation and research method 'par excellence' is: [[Co-operative Inquiry]]


Now these six dimensions interweave and overlap, being mutually supportive of each other. Nevertheless, I hold that each one has in practice an independent identity which will claim the facilitator's attention.  They need to be distinguished from each other in thought and action to achieve effective facilitation. Yet they also need to be interrelated continuously in their application: they are to be distinguished only in order to be woven into an integrated mastery of the learning process. The challenge is to keep an eye on each dimension, and organize them all, over time, into a well-balanced whole.


What characterizes them, and the specific interventions that fall under each of them, is that they are pitched at the level of human intention. They are about the facilitator's purposes, about what he or she is seeking to achieve, with regard to various kinds of learning in the group. The full form of the facilitative question is: given that my purpose is to elicit and empower learning through an effect on this or that dimension, how can I go about it? Each intervention intends to achieve a certain result in a certain way.
==Introductory Articles==


'''The facilitative question'''
* [[Why We Need Facilitation]]!


The facilitative ‘how’ question, defined under each dimension above, has a two-part answer.  One part deals with who will decide about the issue raised by the question. Will it be the facilitator alone, the facilitator and the participants together, or the participants alone? And this takes us into the three political modes of facilitation, given below. The other part deals with what intervention is to be used in dealing with the issue. This, combined with the modes, is covered in the substantial inventory of facilitative interventions given in the chapters on each of the six dimensions.
* Francis Weller: [[Trauma Culture vs Initiation Culture]]


'''The three modes of facilitation: the politics of learning'''
* Michael Maranda & Tim Rayner's call for [[Open Stewardship]]


Each of the above six dimensions can be handled in three different ways. It is one of these three ways which will provide the answer as to who should make decisions on each dimension. From now on, in the description of modes and interventions, I shall refer to the facilitator in the second person, as 'you'.
* Against [[Social Justice Therapy]]. Evan Dunn
#David Loy: [[On the Relationship between Individual and Collective Awakening]]
#For context and background, read '''[[John Heron's Introduction to Facilitation]]''' and his introduction to [http://p2pfoundation.net/John_Heron_on_facilitation_and_the_revolution_in_learning the revolution in learning]
#Rosa Zubizarreta's '''[http://p2pfoundation.net/index.php/Revisioning_Facilitation Introduction]''' specifically tackles the peer to peer vs. leadership aspects of Facilitation; also her (from Heb Shepard) distinctions between [[Primary vs Secondary Individual-Group Mentality]] are crucial as well.
#Jean-Francois Noubel: [[Creating Invisible Architectures for Collective Wisdom]][http://www.thetransitioner.org/Kosmos_Journal_Spring_2008_JF_Noubel.pdf]
#Nova Spivack: [[Towards Healthy Virtual Selves for Collective Groups]]
#Characteristics of [[Participatory Leadership]]: graphic overview by Chris Corrigan
#[[Tom Haskins on the Full Spectrum of Connection Work]]: maintaining connections is hard work
#Christopher Allen: The numbers that matter for governing communities: [[Personal Circle]]; [[Group Tresholds]] and [[Power Law]]s
#Tom Atlee: [[Systems Thinking for Integrated Social Transformation]], lists the main approaches available
 
 
 
More articles:
 
#[http://blogs.salon.com/0002007/2006/12/05.html#a1717 Which tools to use for collaboration in business?] - recommended overview table.
#The specific p2p formats for conferencing are [[Open Space Technology]] and its offshoots in the technology world: [[Unconferences]] and [[BarCamps]]; we are very interested in developments around [[Open Sphere]]
#In [[Transcending the Individual Human Mind through Collaborative Design]], Ernesto Arias et al. explain why peer to peer learning design is essential in complex societies.
#David Eaves warns that [http://eaves.ca/2007/02/05/wikis-and-open-source-collaborative-or-cooperative/ the cooperation of online communities] is not the same as [[Collaboration]] which requires the resolving of differences, and that [[For Benefit]] organizations are community management organizations and not software firms.
#Collaboration in the workplace can be given helpful structure via the set of principles and patterns known as [http://www.human-interaction-management.info Human Interaction Management].
#[http://appreciativeinquiry.case.edu/intro/classicsDetail.cfm?coid=647 Positive Image, Positive Action]: The Affirmative Basis of Organizing. David L Cooperrider: discusses the power of positive imagery, the placebo effect in medicine,the pygmalion effect in education and human development, the relationship between positive-negative discourse in health, the balance of internal dialogue to emotional health, the effects of positive images on culture and the implications for management creating a theory of the affirmative organization.
 
 
Report:
 
* '''Report: [[Rapid Decision Making for Complex Issues]]. HOW TECHNOLOGIES OF COOPERATION CAN HELP. Andrea Saveri and Howard Rheingold. INSTITUTE FOR THE FUTURE, 2005.'''
 
==Areas of Personal and Social Change: Typology==
 
 
Permaculturalist and self-fashioned alchemist/mythologist Willi Paul offers the following technology of change techniques:
 
 
"I am now touting the following types of alchemy to support the global leap in consciousness now under way:
 
'''Imaginative:''' This alchemy excites and creates our ideas, conflicts and even prayers in our brains.
 
'''Eco:''' Seeds, soil, plants and animals living, birthing and dying in a inter-related system pulsed by eco alchemy.
 
'''Shamanic:''' This is alchemy transmutates healing through ceremonies and rituals lead by a trained spiritual leader.
 
'''Sound or Sonic:''' The ancient alchemic power of song from cave rants to classical music and rock’n’roll.
 
'''Digital:''' Electronic learning and feeling working with computers including chat text, email and documents.
 
'''Community:''' People working with people: transforming attitudes, sharing ideas and making plans.
 
'''Earth:''' Planetary consciousness building and human evolution on a universal scale."
 
(http://rosswolfe.wordpress.com/2011/04/01/an-interview-with-the-permaculturalist-willi-paul/)
 
 
=Related Wiki Sections=
 
* Material on "Participation", [[:Category: Participation]]
* Creating Collective Intelligence, [[:Category: Intelligence]]
* Examining the new relationality and cooperative individualism, [[:Category: Relational]]
* The emerging sharing economy, [[:Category: Sharing]]
* Cooperation and cooperatives, [[:Category: Cooperation]] ; [[:Category: Cooperatives]]
 
=Discussion=
 
#[http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/onlinefacilitation/ Online Facilitation]: The onlinefacilitation listserv is for discussion about the skills, techniques and issues around online facilitation in a variety of Internet online environments and virtual communities. [http://www.fullcirc.com/wp/2009/08/14/10th-anniversary-of-the-onlinefacilitation-group/]
 
=Citations=
 
* "The big lesson of the twentieth century for commoners was to discover that collective decision-making is a “lesser evil,” a response to scarcity that must be limited to situations in which this is inevitable. It’s not necessary for everyone to vote on a uniform if each one can wear what they want. It’s not necessary to agree on a menu if several different things can be cooked that will completely satisfy everyone. That is, '''where one person’s decision does not drastically reduces others’ possible choices, the sphere of the decision should be personal, not collective'''. Collective choices, democratic methods and voting are ways of managing situations where, more or less explicitly, there is a conflict in the use of resources. They are a “last option” imposed by scarcity. The point is to avoid, as much as possible, the homogenization that they involve. That is why '''in a community committed to abundance, the wealth produced is measured by the extent of the personal decision-space'''. It’s no good to create more goods and income if that doesn’t have an impact on everyone’s option-space. It’s no good to defend individuality if resources are not created to make it possible without conflict. To gain ground against scarcity, build abundance and therefore continuously enlarge the material base of personal decision-space is the objective of economic activity of an egalitarian community that works."
 
- David de Ugarte [http://english.lasindias.com/community-and-abundance]
 
==Michel Bauwens: the person, the relationship, the field==
 
Responding to a question by Robyin Katz: something I responded to 3 years ago:
 
question asked by Robyn Katz "what’s real facilitation?" :
 
BAUWENS: Among the people I really admire is a guy called John Heron who lives in New Zealand, north of Auckland.  He has something called the South Pacific Centre for Human Inquiry.  So he’s the founder of cooperative inquiry which basically says you can't study human beings as objects because they are subjects.  So any research into the human condition has to be participatory from the get-go, in every phase of the work.  So that’s one thing, but he has a very interesting theory about autonomy, cooperation, and hierarchy.  He says the only thing that justifies hierarchy, so the only thing that justifies facilitation, in a way, is to improve autonomy and cooperation.  So I think the role of a facilitator is to actually plant the seed that makes everyone into a facilitator in a way.  Does that make any sense?
 
So peer-to-peer environments where everybody can contribute to the creation of something that’s shared, they are not leaderless, they are leaderful.  So that’s the whole idea of facilitation, and I think there are two things.  So if you want to change anything to society, we need to change ourselves as persons.  So there’s inner work to be done.  We need to work on our relationships, that’s the second thing.  So how do we relate, how do we share emotions and truth, and how we deal with conflicts -- but there’s a third thing and I think that’s probably what facilitators are doing which is kind of the field in which we operate, right?  Our inner work and the relationships, they don’t occur in nothingness, they occur in something that’s hard to name but it’s there.  You can immediately feel if you have a good facilitator that the quality of both the inner work and the interrelationship actually gets better.  I don’t know how to say this in any better way than that but I think this is an important function and in a P2P foundation wiki, where we look at the transition towards commons-based relationality, societies, businesses.  So basically, it’s overturning the relationship between competition and cooperation.  Now we live in a society where competition is primary, meaning that we play sports in business.  Every team fights against the other team, but within the teams, we work together.  We have to.  To a situation where you say, “Actually, we’re all codependent on something that we have in common, and therefore cooperation becomes primary even if within that we will still maybe compete for certain things.”  So it’s not about utopia.  It’s about kind of a switch to a situation where cooperation becomes the clear dominant way of interacting, and that’s the change from managers or the mass of hierarchy telling people what to do in the competition sphere to facilitators who are the people and who help people cooperate and be autonomous to the maximum degree."
(https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/business-usual-longer-option-robyn-katz/)
 
 
==Chris Corrigan on the fifth mode of organization:==
 
"Within the Art of Hosting community of practice, we have been looking at a fifth organizational paradigm, which is something like a combination of hierarchy, circle, network and bureaucracy.  '''Some of us have been looking at what these four paradigms have to offer, for examples, hierarchy offers order and clarity, circle offers an equal reflective space, network offers an immediate ability to connect with whatever is needed, and bureaucracy helps channel resources where they are needed''', "irrigating" initiatives or parts of an organization.
 
Certainly, each of these has a dark side, but if the benefits are illuminated and then transcended, you get a fifth organizational paradigm in which all four can be somehow present and somehow something new is born."
 
 
==Alex Steffen on why we need peer sharing tools==
 
"as we move more rapidly towards a bright green future, we are going to find ourselves more and more in terra incognita, doing things and creating things and combining things that have never before been done, created or combined. In order to do this well, we have to help each other by sharing what we've learned."
(http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/007769.html)


1. ''The hierarchical mode''.  Here you, the facilitator, direct the learning process, exercise your power over it, and do things for the group. You lead from the front by thinking and acting on behalf of the group. You decide on the objectives and the programme, interpret and give meaning, challenge resistances, manage group feeling and emotion, provide structures for learning and honour the claims of authentic behaviour in the group. You take full responsibility, in charge of all major decisions on all dimensions of the learning process.
2. ''The co-operative mode''.  Here you share your power over the learning process and manage the different dimensions with the group. You enable and guide the group to become more self-directing in the various forms of learning by conferring with them and prompting them. You work with group members to decide on the programme, to give meaning to experiences, to confront resistances, and so on. In this process, you share your own view which, though influential, is not final but one among many. Outcomes are always negotiated. You collaborate with the members of the group in devising the learning process: your facilitation is co-operative.


3. ''The autonomous mode''.  Here you respect the total autonomy of the group: you do not do things for them, or with them, but give them freedom to find their own way, exercising their own judgment without any intervention on your part. Without any reminders, guidance or assistance, they evolve their programme, give meaning to what is going on, find ways of confronting their avoidances, and so on. The bedrock of learning is unprompted, self-directed practice, and here you delegate it to the learner and give space for it. This does not mean the abdication of responsibility. It is the subtle art of creating conditions within which people can exercise full self-determination in their learning.
==Russ Volkmann on the relational stance for leadership==


These three modes deal with the politics of learning, with the exercise of power in the management of the different dimensions of experience. They are about who controls and influences such management. Who makes the decisions about what people learn and how they learn it: the facilitator alone, the facilitator and group members together, or the group members alone? The three modes comprise a higher order, political dimension which runs through all the basic six.  
"Participants need to have “confidence that better outcomes emerge from joint work when the quality of interaction truly matters, rather than when tasks are the sole and primary focus.” This requires a “relational stance.” That is, members are open to the perspectives of others and the possibility that “any contribution by any group member can be a source of intelligence for the group…In sum, the view here is that contentious problems require leadership grounded in processes of joint and individual learning rather than influence (or authority) and that these learning processes must be conducted in a highly relational manner.”
As an effective facilitator, you are someone who can use all these three modes on each of the six dimensions as and when appropriate; and are flexible in moving from mode to mode and dimension to dimension in the light of the changing situation in the group. This is no doubt a counsel of perfection, but it broadens the facilitative imagination to entertain the total 18-part grid of options in the back of the mind.
(http://www.integralleadershipreview.com/archives/2009-01/2009-01-review-dunoon-ross-volckmann.php)


Too much hierarchical control, and participants become passive and dependent or hostile and resistant. They wane in self-direction, which is the core of all learning.  Too much co-operative guidance may degenerate into a subtle kind of nurturing oppression, and may deny the group the benefits of totally autonomous learning. Too much autonomy for participants and laissez-faire on your part, and they may wallow in ignorance, misconception and chaos.
The modes can include each other.  You can be basically hierarchical, but with elements of co-operation and autonomy. Thus, within hierarchically given exercises, members will always be autonomous, self-directing in active practice when taking their turn. This is the heart of learning particular skills and awarenesses. Alternatively, the group as a whole may be in an autonomous phase, and call you in to do a piece of hierarchical work, etc.
 
'''The use of the modes:  stages and presumptions'''
Each experiential group, depending on its learning objectives, will require a different balance of the three modes. And any given group may need this balance to change at different stages in its development, each stage depending on certain presumptions. The three stages below are not a formula for any learning group.  It all depends on the objectives and the prior experience of group members.


Some groups, especially those attending in-service training courses for skilled people, may start at stage 2 or stage 3. But the three stages given here are classic ones for training absolute beginners, as they are for parenting. It is important to remember they can overlap, the earlier ones running on, in reduced form, beside the later ones.
==On Staying Non-Hierarchical==


1.  ''Hierarchy early on''.  At the outset a clear hierarchical framework may be needed within which early development of co-operation and autonomy can occur. The presumption here is that participants are insecure and dependent in the area of learning, with lack of knowledge and skill, and have little ability therefore to orientate themselves. They will benefit from your command of events. There is also the presumption that your use of the hierarchical mode, making decisions for the learners, is based on their consent. Within the hierarchical framework, there will of course be autonomous practice and co-operative exchanges with you.
"To egalitarian groups that want to stay so, we could thus propose the following ethics: to not reduce any force of internal differentiation, for fear that it becomes vertical, but instead to increase it in all directions, to enrich the range of identities available: this is probably the best way not to flatten the (many) relationships within the group and turn them into one two-term relationship - dominating, dominated. In this way, the construction of our collective histories can stand a chance of no longer being at the mercy of the passions that affect it, subjugate it, and often sadden it: it would play with these passions, which would become joyful - including, yes, the passion for distinguishing oneself." (http://self-org.blogspot.com/p/anti-hierarchical-artifices-for-groups.html)


2. ''Co-operation mid-term''. In the middle phase, more open collaboration with group members may be appropriate in managing the learning process. You negotiate the curriculum with them and co-operatively guide their learning activities, with various forms of staff-student contracting and agreement. The presumption here is that they have acquired some confidence in the area of learning, with a foundation of knowledge and skill. In this way, they are able to orientate themselves and participate with you in decisions about how the learning should proceed.
=Directory=


3. ''Autonomy later on''.  In the later phase, much more delegation and scope for the group to be autonomous and self-directed may be needed, with peer learning contracts and self- and peer assessment. The presumption here is that group members have considerable confidence in the area of learning and have acquired evident competence in a sizeable body of knowledge and skill. They benefit from full self-determination in their learning.
==[[Digital Commoning Techniques]]==


''Participation in educational decision-making: the classic dilemma''
Via [[Co-Creative Recipes]]:


People in our society carry around a lot of unprocessed distress caused by having been the victims of oppressive educational methods from the earliest years - both at home and at school - where their needs and rights as embryonic persons have not been fully honoured or realized. One result of this oppression is that they lack certain basic human skills: skills in handling their own emotions, skills in interacting with other persons, skills in self-direction and collective decision-making. There has been a gross deficiency in the range and depth of their education and training.
* [[Counter-Mapping Party]]
* [[Edit-A-Thon]]
* [[Hackathon]]
* [[LaboLex]]
* [[Mapping Parties]]
* [[PARK(ing) Day]]
* [[Public Domain Remix]]
* [[Urban Accessibility Mapping Party]]


This leads to the classic dilemma of all educational reform. Students have the need and the right to be released from oppressive forms of education and should be encouraged to participate in educational decision-making. But they are conditioned and disempowered by these forms, and may not have the motivation, or the personal, interpersonal and self-directing skills required, to break out of them. So they may be neither satisfied nor effective when encouraged to co-operate with you and to be participative.
==[[Neotraditional Cooperative Forms]]==


The resolution of this dilemma lies in mastery of the three modes and the three classic stages outlined in the preceding section. Only give away an appropriate amount of power at a time, otherwise neither you nor the students will be able to cope. And realize the huge array of options you have in combining the three modes in different ways, with varying degrees of emphasis, in relation to so many diverse facets of the educational process (for more on this see Chapter 5). There is no need to hasten inappropriately forward by gross leaps, when you can proceeed slowly by innumerable subtle steps.
Via [[Co-Creative Recipes]]:


#[[Ayni]]:  a term with a meaning that’s closely related to minga. It describes a system of work and family reciprocity among membersa Filipino term taken from the word bayan, referring to a nation, country, town or community. The whole term bayanihan refers to a spirit of communal unity or effort to achieve a particular objective. of the ayllu (a community working on collective land).
#[[Bayanihan]]:
#[[Córima]]: The Rarámuri people of Mexico’s Chihuahua mountains use the word “córima” to describe an act of solidarity with someone who’s having trouble.
#[[Gadugi]]:  a term used in the Cherokee language which means “working together” or “cooperative labor” within a community
#[[Gotong-Royong]]: in parts of Indonesia and Malaysia, Gotong-royong is a cooperation among many people to attain a shared goal with ideas of reciprocity or mutual aid.
#[[Guelaguetza]]:  a cross between a potlatch and a tequio. The term describes “a reciprocal exchange of goods and services”.
#[[Harambee]]: a Kenyan tradition of community self-help events, e.g. playdraising or development activities. Harambee literally means “all pull together” in Swahili
#[[Imece]]:  a name given for a traditional Turkish village-scale collaboration.
#[[Maloka]]:  (or maloka in Portuguese) is an indigenous communal house found in the indigenous Amazon region of Colombia and Brazil.
#[[Meitheal]]: the Irish word for a work team, gang, or party and denotes the co-operative labour system in Ireland where groups of neighbours help each other in turn with farming work
#[[Mutirão]]: This is originally a Tupi term used in Brazil to describe collective mobilizations based on non-remunerated mutual help.
#[[Naffīr]]: an Arabic word used in parts of Sudan (including Kordofan, Darfur, parts of the Nuba mountains and Kassala) to describe particular types of communal work undertakings.
#[[Tequio]]: a very popular type of work for collective benefit in the Zapotec culture. Community members contribute materials or labor to carry out construction work for the community.


=Key Resources=
=Key Resources=


See the report [[Online Tools for a Sustainable Collaborative Economy]]
* See Robin Good's overview mindmap on the [http://www.mindmeister.com/12213323?title=best-online-collaboration-tools-2010-robin-good-s-collaborative-map Best Online Collaboration Tools]
 
* The [[Group Pattern Language]]: A Pattern Language for Bringing Life To Meetings and Other Gatherings, also produced in the form of a card deck [http://groupworksdeck.org/patterns_by_category]. Produced by [[Group Works]]
* [[Liberating structures]]: new ways of structuring interactions between people to foster better results
* [[Labso]] (Laboratory for Social Technologies) is a cross-over between open-source facilitations techniques and principles, strength-based approaches to change, and social interactions to help people 1) act together during a workshop to address a specific issue and 2) learn how the same techniques can be used to tackle any issue. The Labso is itself released in Open-source.
 
We recommend the material gathered by the Participedia:
 
#[http://www.participedia.net/wiki/Special:BrowseData/Methods Methods of Participation]
#[http://www.participedia.net/wiki/Special:BrowseData/Organizations Directory of Organizations Active in Participation]
#[http://www.participedia.net/wiki/Special:BrowseData/Cases Case Studies in Participation]
 
 
==General==
 
'''* Report: Gather: the [[Art and Science of Effective Convening]].''' Rockefeller Foundation, Monitor Institute and Monitor Deloitte, 2013 [http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/uploads/files/934f8c4a-866a-44bc-b890-7602cc99aefa-rockefeller.pdf]
 
 
See also:
 
#Seb Paquet's list of [http://seb.wikispaces.com/Online+communities+of+cooperation+and+collaboration+thinkers Online communities of cooperation and collaboration thinkers]
#The [http://blog.participatedb.com/ ParticipateDB directory] is very ambitious in creating "the world's most comprehensive directory of tools for participation"
#General Facilitation Literature is compiled by [http://distributedresearch.net/wiki/index.php/Facilitation_literature DAR]
#'''An overview, with links, of facilitation methodologies''' by [http://chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot/?page_id=958 Chris Corrigan]
#[http://files.uniteddiversity.com/Decision_Making_and_Democracy/ Tools and Literature on Decision-Making for Democracy], compiled by Josef Davies-Coates
#[http://connect.educause.edu/Library/EDUCAUSE+Review/ConferenceConnectionsRewi/46312 Augmenting Conferences through technology]: great overview of tools and examples by George Siemens and Terry Anderson et al. Reviews [[Augmented Conferences]], [[Blended Conferences]], [[Online Conferences]] etc...
#Recommended course on [http://www.facilitatingwithconfidence.com/ Facilitating with Confidence]
#[http://blogs.salon.com/0002007/2009/03/18.html#a2348 The Optimal Size of Groups]: Christopher Allen of the Life With Alacrity blog has expanded his articles on group size, with an article on community sizes and another on personal circle sizes. The latter are our own self-centred circles (those we're in the middle of), while the former are circles of which we have chosen to be a member. The dynamics of the two, Christopher says, are different.
#Recommended community: [[Global Sensemaking]]
#[http://self-org.blogspot.com/p/resources.html Bibliography on non-hierarchical self-organisation]
 
==On Online Facilitation==
 
#The [[Loomio Facilitation Guide]]: "What if we started from facilitation principles and worked toward understanding software? This guide goes in-depth about applying key facilitation concepts in the online space." [http://loomio.school/facilitators_guide/]
#Overview of online facilitation and [[Moderation Models]]. By Dolors Reig.
#Overview graphic by Robin Good begin_of_the_skype_highlighting     end_of_the_skype_highlighting: [[Collaborative Map of Online Collaboration Tools]]
#[http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/05/15/online-meeting-tools 17 Online Facilitation Tools]
#Intro to [http://www.chatmoderators.com/targetedmoderation/moderation-software/index.html moderation software]
 
See also:
 
#The report [[Online Tools for a Sustainable Collaborative Economy]].
#There is a budding wiki on [http://onlinefacilitation.wikispaces.com/ Online Facilitation].
#The DAR group maintains a collection of [http://distributedresearch.net/wiki/index.php/Online_Facilitation_Links Online Facilitation Links] and a review of related [http://distributedresearch.net/wiki/index.php/Online_facilitation_literature Literature]
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_groupware Free groupware]: links to collaborative software which can be freely used, copied, studied, modified, and redistributed
#[http://technologyandsocialaction.org/node/190 Josef Davies-Coates] maintains a directory of offline and [[Online Decision-Making Tools]], which he keeps updated through this [http://del.icio.us/qopi/decision_making bookmark]
#The ideal [http://www.wearemedia.org/tools+template Social Media Toolbox] selection for nonprofits
#[http://collaboration.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_collaborative_software List of collaboration software]and of [http://collaboration.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_wiki_software Wiki software], compiled by Mark Elliot
#[[Tools for Online Idea Generation]]: a side-by-side overview comparison of ten popular tools for online idea generation. [http://www.collaborationproject.org/tools-for-online-idea-generation/]
 
==Key Articles==
 
* [[Facilitating Smarter Crowds for Stronger Networked Commons]]
* [[Social Theory as a Transformative Force]]. By David Cooperrider and Suresh Srivastva
* Understanding the [[Two Levels of Change]]. By Larry Victor.
* Developmental Spaces: Cultural incubators for a time of transformation. By Rosie Bell, Boaz Feldman & Rufus Pollock. [https://developmentalspaces.org/paper]
 
==Key Books==
 
* '''[[Designing Regenerative Cultures]]. By Daniel Christian Wahl. Triarchy Press, 2016''' [http://www.triarchypress.net/reviews-designing-regenerative-cultures.html]
 
* [[Planning and Facilitative Leadership in the Face of Conflict]]
 
See also:
 
#The [http://www.bkconnection.com/ProdDetails.asp?ID=9781576753798 Change Handbook]The Definitive Resource on Today's Best Methods for Engaging Whole Systems Arrow. by Peggy Holman , Tom Devane , Steven Cady
#The [[Facilitator's Guide to Participatory Decision-Making]]
#[[Liberating Voices]]: guide to a liberatory pattern language for human communication
#[[Books on Building Online Community]]. List compiled by Nancy White [http://onlinefacilitation.wikispaces.com/Books+on+Building+Online+Community]
#Otto Laske. [[Manual of Dialectical Thought Forms]].
#'''[[Online Deliberation]]: Design, Research, and Practice.''' Todd Davies and Seeta Pena Gangadharan editors. Stanford: CSLI Publications, November 2009; '''free pdf download''' at http://odbook.stanford.edu
#[[Doing Good Things Better]]. Brian Martin. Irene Publishing, 2011 [http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/11gt/]
#Richard Sennett. Together: The [[Rituals, Pleasures, and Politics of Cooperation]]. Yale University Press, 2012.
 
==Key Blogs==
 
#[http://p2tools.blogspot.com/ P2 Software and Technology]: A blog that highlights the use of technology for public participation/public involvement and decisionmaking purposes.
 
 
==Key Conferences==
 
#[http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/ Fourth International Conference on Online Deliberation]
 
==Key Organizations==
 
* [[International Association of Facilitators]]
 
 
 
==Key Skills==
 
What kind of skills do we need for the p2p age (an age of collaboration),
 
as proposed by Donnie Maclurcan [http://postgrowth.org/upskilling-for-post-growth-futures-together/]:
 
 
===Means of Learning and the Self===
 
Individual asset mapping
Systems thinking
Finding your purpose through strategic questioning
The latest science on learning processes and knowledge retention
Speed reading
Touch typing
Mysticism and the Divine Masculine and Divine Feminine within
Developing intuition
Yoga and breath work
Meditation
De-cluttering
Time management techniques
 
 
===Community, Family and Leadership===
 
Key lessons from human history
Asset-based community development
Running an ‘offers and needs market’
Relationship skills
Non-violent communication and conflict resolution
Diversity sensitivities (including GLBTQI, cultural, religious, disability, age, indigenous/First Nation)
Parenting and family dynamics
Dynamic teaching and group facilitation
Circle work and other decision-making techniques
Confident public speaking
Singing in harmony and dancing together
How to read and play music
Holding and participating in sacred rituals
Improvisation theatre
Storytelling
Restorative justice
Fun cooperative games for children and communities (including outdoor and card games)
Sharing law
Effective campaigning and lobbying
Child honouring and protection (including an introduction to ADHD, child trauma and special needs)
Graphic facilitation
Conversational French/Spanish/Mandarin/Arabic
Archiving (sound, video, images, stories, items, documents)
 
 
===Health===
 
Basic anatomy (and terminology), understanding the body’s systems and exercise physiology
Injury rehabilitation
Holistic approaches to healthcare (including natural, homemade medicinal remedies and birth control)
Administering first aid
Administering mental health first aid
Medicinal herbs
Massage (including acupressure)
Sleeping well
Natural birthing
Natural cleaning
 
 
 
===Food and Nature===
 
Composting and improving soil quality
Setting up a worm farm
Growing food
Permaculture principles and sector design
No-dig gardening
Threshing
Aquaponics
Seed saving and plant propagation
Pruning
Grafting
Ploughing (with animals and vehicles)
Identifying invasive species
Connecting and working with animals (including husbandry, birthing and basic healthcare)
Horsemanship
Raising fowl
Understanding the weather (and reading a weather map)
Disaster preparedness (including earthquakes, sandbagging for floods, and hazard reduction and back-burning along with fire safety)
Cooking essentials
Vegetarian cooking
Bread making
Preserving food (canning, drying)
Sprouting
Fermenting (including brewing, distilling, mead making, winemaking)
 
 
 
===Bushcraft===
 
Orienteering
Hiking and camping (including the ‘leave no trace’ principles)
Tracking
Fishing
Sourcing water from nature
Shelter building
Open fire cooking
Sourcing food (forest foraging and gleaning)
Fire making (including natural fire creation)
Rope making and essential knots
Hunting and using weapons
Animal food preparation
 
 
 
===Building, Equipment and Vehicles===
 
Fundamental principles of structural engineering
Building structures (including insulation)
Coppicing
Woodwork
Stonework
Natural brickmaking
Creating natural toilets
Smithing
Bike maintenance
Vehicle maintenance (including mechanics)
Boat maintenance (including mechanics)
How to operate heavy machinery
How to use power tools
Using non-power tools
Sourcing and installing renewable energy
Water/sewage systems design and building (including filtration, drip irrigation, Keyline and swales)
Passive solar design
Sailing
Paddling (kayak and canoe)
Swimming and water safety
Electronic basics and how to fix electrical faults
Amateur radio and setting up a mesh network
Using vehicles in extreme conditions (including towing and defensive driving)
 
 
 
===Urban-oriented Skills===
 
Urban farming
Setting up a rain water collection system
Setting up a photovoltaic power generator
Dumpster diving
 
 
 
===Crafts and Making===
 
Life hacking
Up-cycling and making things from scratch (including dyes, soaps and shampoos)
Mending, knitting, sewing, crocheting and weaving
Tanning (to produce leather)
Homemade cosmetics
Drawing
Painting
Pottery
 
 
 
===Business===
 
Sustainable business models (including not-for-profit associations and companies, solidarity franchises, producer-, consumer-, worker- and multi-stakeholder cooperatives, community land trusts, benefit corporations, community interest companies)
Running an organization
Participatory organizing for business (including Sociocracy)
Project management
Budgeting, bookkeeping, money management and invoicing
Information management
Sourcing items ethically
Blogging
Coding
Server setup, website design and development (including CMS setup)
Using other online tools
Setting up and managing a wiki "
 
(http://postgrowth.org/upskilling-for-post-growth-futures-together/)
 
==Key Tools==
 
* [http://cpsquare.org/wiki/Technology_for_Communities_project Technology for Communities project]: "tools that are used by communities of practice, explain how each functions from a community perspective, and suggest why you might select the tool, given your community's orientation and the activities your community wants."
* [http://processarts.wagn.org/wagn/Participatory_Processes Index of Participatory Practices], maintained by Tom Atlee.
* [http://emergentbydesign.com/2012/10/25/21-card-decks-creative-problem-solving-effective-communication-strategic-foresight/ 21 CARD DECKS FOR CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING, EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION & STRATEGIC FORESIGHT]
 
Also:
 
#[[Actions Options Tool]]: open source peer to peer organizing tool for activist organizations. Here is a [http://snap.actionsoptions.org/uploads/demo/introduction.mov screencast] which provides a preview of AOT's features
#[[Open Sphere]], group facilitation method
#Bernie DeKoven explains [[Coliberation]] strategies in his book The [[Well-Played Game]]
#[http://kforge.appropriatesoftware.net/ Appropriate Software Foundation]: facilities and tools to develop Free Software supports for civil society processes.
#[[Amazee]], is a recommended [[Social Collaboration Platform]]
#[http://blueoxen.net/wiki/Pattern_Repository Blue Oxen High-Performance Collaboration Pattern Repository]: Inspired by Christopher Alexander, this is a repository for collecting, discussing, and refactoring patterns for High-Performance Collaboration.
#The [http://metagovernment.org/ Metagovernment Project] keeps track of [[Collaborative Governance Projects]] and [[Collaborative Governance Software]] [http://metagovernment.org/wiki/Related_projects]
 
=Directory=
 
List of participatory processes that should be part of our directory [http://processarts.wagn.org/wagn/Participatory_Processes]:
 
 
Active Listening * Appreciative Inquiry * Area Neighborhood Forum * Arbitration * Arts Based Civic Dialogue * Asset Based Community Development * Backcasting * Bohm Dialogue * Brainstorming * Briefing * Candidate Evaluation Panel * Chime And Stone * Choice Creating * Choice Work * Citizen Advisory Committee * Citizen Committee * Citizen Consensus Council * Citizen Deliberative Council * Citizen Election Forum * Citizen Initiative Review * Citizen Jury * Citizen Panel * Citizen Reflective Council * Citizen Survey Panel * Collaborative Inquiry *
Commons Cafe * Community Asset Inventory * Community Consultation Committee * Community Fair * Community Indicator * Community Issues Group * Community Planning * Community Viz * Compassionate Listening *  Conflict Transformation * Conflict Work * Consensus Building * Consensus Building Exercise * Consensus Conference * Consensus Organizing * Consensus Participation * Consensus Process * Conversation Cafe * Council Process (see Talking Circle) * Deliberation * Deliberative Dialogue * Deliberative Focus Group * Deliberative Inclusionary Process * Deliberative Opinion Poll (aka Deliberative Polling) * Delphi Study * Design Charrette * Despair And Empowerment Work * Dialogue * Dialogue Mapping * Dynamic Facilitation * Enlightened Communication * Fast Cycle Full Participation *  Fish Bowl * Flower Diagram Workshop * Focus Group * Future Search * Gemba Kaizen * Gestures Of Conversational Presence * Group Awareness Exercise * Group Silence * Integrative Conversation * Interactive Strategic Planning * Intergroup Dialogue * Intragroup Dialogue * Large Group Intervention * Listening Circle (see Talking Circle) * Listening Project * Multi Objective Decision Support System (MODSS) * Multiple Viewpoint Drama * Neighborhood Policy Jury * Open Question Circle * Open Sentences Practice * Open Space Technology * Participative Design Workshop * Participatory Budgeting * Participatory Idealized Design * Participatory Research * Participatory Rural Appraisal (aka Participatory Research And Action) (PRA) * Process Worldwork * Regulatory Negotiation * Residents Feedback Panel * Restorative Justice * Story Circle * Sustained Dialogue * Symbolic Dialogue * Talking Circle *
Transformative Mediation * Widening Circles Exercise * Wisdom Council * World Cafe *
 
[[Category:P2P Infrastructure]]

Latest revision as of 09:00, 23 October 2025

Introduction

This is where we explore the facilitation of learning and inquiry, and of organizational life, to enhance whole person development, participation and collaboration.


The motto of this section is:

Getting Better at Working Together! We now have all the tools necessary to make communities work.

or, in slightly more complex terminology: From a recognition of Equipotentiality, to a practice of Coliberation, the advance of any of us to the ability to engage in peer to peer relationships is dependent on the ability of all.

Peer to peer, as a distributed mode of organization and way of thinking, expresses itself not only in a technological infrastructure, but also in modes of organization, and in ways to stimulate social processes that are congruent with it. There is a emergence of a wide variety of dialogical techniques to ellicit collaboration and collective intelligence. While this section mostly focuses on the human-relational aspect of facilitation, it will also monitor technological enablers to this process.

Inspired by the work of Dana Klisanin, the P2P Foundation favors the development of Evolutionary Guidance Media which posits the pairing of compassionate-seeing/action with that of Cyberception, or humankind’s rapidly advancing technological abilities, resulting in Transception, [1]


Not all relevant entries from the P2P Encyclopedia have been ported here yet: only material from A to C.

The P2P facilitation and research method 'par excellence' is: Co-operative Inquiry


Introductory Articles

  1. David Loy: On the Relationship between Individual and Collective Awakening
  2. For context and background, read John Heron's Introduction to Facilitation and his introduction to the revolution in learning
  3. Rosa Zubizarreta's Introduction specifically tackles the peer to peer vs. leadership aspects of Facilitation; also her (from Heb Shepard) distinctions between Primary vs Secondary Individual-Group Mentality are crucial as well.
  4. Jean-Francois Noubel: Creating Invisible Architectures for Collective Wisdom[2]
  5. Nova Spivack: Towards Healthy Virtual Selves for Collective Groups
  6. Characteristics of Participatory Leadership: graphic overview by Chris Corrigan
  7. Tom Haskins on the Full Spectrum of Connection Work: maintaining connections is hard work
  8. Christopher Allen: The numbers that matter for governing communities: Personal Circle; Group Tresholds and Power Laws
  9. Tom Atlee: Systems Thinking for Integrated Social Transformation, lists the main approaches available


More articles:

  1. Which tools to use for collaboration in business? - recommended overview table.
  2. The specific p2p formats for conferencing are Open Space Technology and its offshoots in the technology world: Unconferences and BarCamps; we are very interested in developments around Open Sphere
  3. In Transcending the Individual Human Mind through Collaborative Design, Ernesto Arias et al. explain why peer to peer learning design is essential in complex societies.
  4. David Eaves warns that the cooperation of online communities is not the same as Collaboration which requires the resolving of differences, and that For Benefit organizations are community management organizations and not software firms.
  5. Collaboration in the workplace can be given helpful structure via the set of principles and patterns known as Human Interaction Management.
  6. Positive Image, Positive Action: The Affirmative Basis of Organizing. David L Cooperrider: discusses the power of positive imagery, the placebo effect in medicine,the pygmalion effect in education and human development, the relationship between positive-negative discourse in health, the balance of internal dialogue to emotional health, the effects of positive images on culture and the implications for management creating a theory of the affirmative organization.


Report:

Areas of Personal and Social Change: Typology

Permaculturalist and self-fashioned alchemist/mythologist Willi Paul offers the following technology of change techniques:


"I am now touting the following types of alchemy to support the global leap in consciousness now under way:

Imaginative: This alchemy excites and creates our ideas, conflicts and even prayers in our brains.

Eco: Seeds, soil, plants and animals living, birthing and dying in a inter-related system pulsed by eco alchemy.

Shamanic: This is alchemy transmutates healing through ceremonies and rituals lead by a trained spiritual leader.

Sound or Sonic: The ancient alchemic power of song from cave rants to classical music and rock’n’roll.

Digital: Electronic learning and feeling working with computers including chat text, email and documents.

Community: People working with people: transforming attitudes, sharing ideas and making plans.

Earth: Planetary consciousness building and human evolution on a universal scale."

(http://rosswolfe.wordpress.com/2011/04/01/an-interview-with-the-permaculturalist-willi-paul/)


Related Wiki Sections

Discussion

  1. Online Facilitation: The onlinefacilitation listserv is for discussion about the skills, techniques and issues around online facilitation in a variety of Internet online environments and virtual communities. [3]

Citations

  • "The big lesson of the twentieth century for commoners was to discover that collective decision-making is a “lesser evil,” a response to scarcity that must be limited to situations in which this is inevitable. It’s not necessary for everyone to vote on a uniform if each one can wear what they want. It’s not necessary to agree on a menu if several different things can be cooked that will completely satisfy everyone. That is, where one person’s decision does not drastically reduces others’ possible choices, the sphere of the decision should be personal, not collective. Collective choices, democratic methods and voting are ways of managing situations where, more or less explicitly, there is a conflict in the use of resources. They are a “last option” imposed by scarcity. The point is to avoid, as much as possible, the homogenization that they involve. That is why in a community committed to abundance, the wealth produced is measured by the extent of the personal decision-space. It’s no good to create more goods and income if that doesn’t have an impact on everyone’s option-space. It’s no good to defend individuality if resources are not created to make it possible without conflict. To gain ground against scarcity, build abundance and therefore continuously enlarge the material base of personal decision-space is the objective of economic activity of an egalitarian community that works."

- David de Ugarte [4]

Michel Bauwens: the person, the relationship, the field

Responding to a question by Robyin Katz: something I responded to 3 years ago:

question asked by Robyn Katz "what’s real facilitation?" :

BAUWENS: Among the people I really admire is a guy called John Heron who lives in New Zealand, north of Auckland. He has something called the South Pacific Centre for Human Inquiry. So he’s the founder of cooperative inquiry which basically says you can't study human beings as objects because they are subjects. So any research into the human condition has to be participatory from the get-go, in every phase of the work. So that’s one thing, but he has a very interesting theory about autonomy, cooperation, and hierarchy. He says the only thing that justifies hierarchy, so the only thing that justifies facilitation, in a way, is to improve autonomy and cooperation. So I think the role of a facilitator is to actually plant the seed that makes everyone into a facilitator in a way. Does that make any sense?

So peer-to-peer environments where everybody can contribute to the creation of something that’s shared, they are not leaderless, they are leaderful. So that’s the whole idea of facilitation, and I think there are two things. So if you want to change anything to society, we need to change ourselves as persons. So there’s inner work to be done. We need to work on our relationships, that’s the second thing. So how do we relate, how do we share emotions and truth, and how we deal with conflicts -- but there’s a third thing and I think that’s probably what facilitators are doing which is kind of the field in which we operate, right? Our inner work and the relationships, they don’t occur in nothingness, they occur in something that’s hard to name but it’s there. You can immediately feel if you have a good facilitator that the quality of both the inner work and the interrelationship actually gets better. I don’t know how to say this in any better way than that but I think this is an important function and in a P2P foundation wiki, where we look at the transition towards commons-based relationality, societies, businesses. So basically, it’s overturning the relationship between competition and cooperation. Now we live in a society where competition is primary, meaning that we play sports in business. Every team fights against the other team, but within the teams, we work together. We have to. To a situation where you say, “Actually, we’re all codependent on something that we have in common, and therefore cooperation becomes primary even if within that we will still maybe compete for certain things.” So it’s not about utopia. It’s about kind of a switch to a situation where cooperation becomes the clear dominant way of interacting, and that’s the change from managers or the mass of hierarchy telling people what to do in the competition sphere to facilitators who are the people and who help people cooperate and be autonomous to the maximum degree." (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/business-usual-longer-option-robyn-katz/)


Chris Corrigan on the fifth mode of organization:

"Within the Art of Hosting community of practice, we have been looking at a fifth organizational paradigm, which is something like a combination of hierarchy, circle, network and bureaucracy. Some of us have been looking at what these four paradigms have to offer, for examples, hierarchy offers order and clarity, circle offers an equal reflective space, network offers an immediate ability to connect with whatever is needed, and bureaucracy helps channel resources where they are needed, "irrigating" initiatives or parts of an organization.

Certainly, each of these has a dark side, but if the benefits are illuminated and then transcended, you get a fifth organizational paradigm in which all four can be somehow present and somehow something new is born."


Alex Steffen on why we need peer sharing tools

"as we move more rapidly towards a bright green future, we are going to find ourselves more and more in terra incognita, doing things and creating things and combining things that have never before been done, created or combined. In order to do this well, we have to help each other by sharing what we've learned." (http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/007769.html)


Russ Volkmann on the relational stance for leadership

"Participants need to have “confidence that better outcomes emerge from joint work when the quality of interaction truly matters, rather than when tasks are the sole and primary focus.” This requires a “relational stance.” That is, members are open to the perspectives of others and the possibility that “any contribution by any group member can be a source of intelligence for the group…In sum, the view here is that contentious problems require leadership grounded in processes of joint and individual learning rather than influence (or authority) and that these learning processes must be conducted in a highly relational manner.” (http://www.integralleadershipreview.com/archives/2009-01/2009-01-review-dunoon-ross-volckmann.php)


On Staying Non-Hierarchical

"To egalitarian groups that want to stay so, we could thus propose the following ethics: to not reduce any force of internal differentiation, for fear that it becomes vertical, but instead to increase it in all directions, to enrich the range of identities available: this is probably the best way not to flatten the (many) relationships within the group and turn them into one two-term relationship - dominating, dominated. In this way, the construction of our collective histories can stand a chance of no longer being at the mercy of the passions that affect it, subjugate it, and often sadden it: it would play with these passions, which would become joyful - including, yes, the passion for distinguishing oneself." (http://self-org.blogspot.com/p/anti-hierarchical-artifices-for-groups.html)

Directory

Digital Commoning Techniques

Via Co-Creative Recipes:

Neotraditional Cooperative Forms

Via Co-Creative Recipes:

  1. Ayni: a term with a meaning that’s closely related to minga. It describes a system of work and family reciprocity among membersa Filipino term taken from the word bayan, referring to a nation, country, town or community. The whole term bayanihan refers to a spirit of communal unity or effort to achieve a particular objective. of the ayllu (a community working on collective land).
  2. Bayanihan:
  3. Córima: The Rarámuri people of Mexico’s Chihuahua mountains use the word “córima” to describe an act of solidarity with someone who’s having trouble.
  4. Gadugi: a term used in the Cherokee language which means “working together” or “cooperative labor” within a community
  5. Gotong-Royong: in parts of Indonesia and Malaysia, Gotong-royong is a cooperation among many people to attain a shared goal with ideas of reciprocity or mutual aid.
  6. Guelaguetza: a cross between a potlatch and a tequio. The term describes “a reciprocal exchange of goods and services”.
  7. Harambee: a Kenyan tradition of community self-help events, e.g. playdraising or development activities. Harambee literally means “all pull together” in Swahili
  8. Imece: a name given for a traditional Turkish village-scale collaboration.
  9. Maloka: (or maloka in Portuguese) is an indigenous communal house found in the indigenous Amazon region of Colombia and Brazil.
  10. Meitheal: the Irish word for a work team, gang, or party and denotes the co-operative labour system in Ireland where groups of neighbours help each other in turn with farming work
  11. Mutirão: This is originally a Tupi term used in Brazil to describe collective mobilizations based on non-remunerated mutual help.
  12. Naffīr: an Arabic word used in parts of Sudan (including Kordofan, Darfur, parts of the Nuba mountains and Kassala) to describe particular types of communal work undertakings.
  13. Tequio: a very popular type of work for collective benefit in the Zapotec culture. Community members contribute materials or labor to carry out construction work for the community.

Key Resources

  • The Group Pattern Language: A Pattern Language for Bringing Life To Meetings and Other Gatherings, also produced in the form of a card deck [5]. Produced by Group Works
  • Liberating structures: new ways of structuring interactions between people to foster better results
  • Labso (Laboratory for Social Technologies) is a cross-over between open-source facilitations techniques and principles, strength-based approaches to change, and social interactions to help people 1) act together during a workshop to address a specific issue and 2) learn how the same techniques can be used to tackle any issue. The Labso is itself released in Open-source.

We recommend the material gathered by the Participedia:

  1. Methods of Participation
  2. Directory of Organizations Active in Participation
  3. Case Studies in Participation


General

* Report: Gather: the Art and Science of Effective Convening. Rockefeller Foundation, Monitor Institute and Monitor Deloitte, 2013 [6]


See also:

  1. Seb Paquet's list of Online communities of cooperation and collaboration thinkers
  2. The ParticipateDB directory is very ambitious in creating "the world's most comprehensive directory of tools for participation"
  3. General Facilitation Literature is compiled by DAR
  4. An overview, with links, of facilitation methodologies by Chris Corrigan
  5. Tools and Literature on Decision-Making for Democracy, compiled by Josef Davies-Coates
  6. Augmenting Conferences through technology: great overview of tools and examples by George Siemens and Terry Anderson et al. Reviews Augmented Conferences, Blended Conferences, Online Conferences etc...
  7. Recommended course on Facilitating with Confidence
  8. The Optimal Size of Groups: Christopher Allen of the Life With Alacrity blog has expanded his articles on group size, with an article on community sizes and another on personal circle sizes. The latter are our own self-centred circles (those we're in the middle of), while the former are circles of which we have chosen to be a member. The dynamics of the two, Christopher says, are different.
  9. Recommended community: Global Sensemaking
  10. Bibliography on non-hierarchical self-organisation

On Online Facilitation

  1. The Loomio Facilitation Guide: "What if we started from facilitation principles and worked toward understanding software? This guide goes in-depth about applying key facilitation concepts in the online space." [7]
  2. Overview of online facilitation and Moderation Models. By Dolors Reig.
  3. Overview graphic by Robin Good begin_of_the_skype_highlighting     end_of_the_skype_highlighting: Collaborative Map of Online Collaboration Tools
  4. 17 Online Facilitation Tools
  5. Intro to moderation software

See also:

  1. The report Online Tools for a Sustainable Collaborative Economy.
  2. There is a budding wiki on Online Facilitation.
  3. The DAR group maintains a collection of Online Facilitation Links and a review of related Literature
  4. Free groupware: links to collaborative software which can be freely used, copied, studied, modified, and redistributed
  5. Josef Davies-Coates maintains a directory of offline and Online Decision-Making Tools, which he keeps updated through this bookmark
  6. The ideal Social Media Toolbox selection for nonprofits
  7. List of collaboration softwareand of Wiki software, compiled by Mark Elliot
  8. Tools for Online Idea Generation: a side-by-side overview comparison of ten popular tools for online idea generation. [8]

Key Articles

Key Books

See also:

  1. The Change HandbookThe Definitive Resource on Today's Best Methods for Engaging Whole Systems Arrow. by Peggy Holman , Tom Devane , Steven Cady
  2. The Facilitator's Guide to Participatory Decision-Making
  3. Liberating Voices: guide to a liberatory pattern language for human communication
  4. Books on Building Online Community. List compiled by Nancy White [11]
  5. Otto Laske. Manual of Dialectical Thought Forms.
  6. Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice. Todd Davies and Seeta Pena Gangadharan editors. Stanford: CSLI Publications, November 2009; free pdf download at http://odbook.stanford.edu
  7. Doing Good Things Better. Brian Martin. Irene Publishing, 2011 [12]
  8. Richard Sennett. Together: The Rituals, Pleasures, and Politics of Cooperation. Yale University Press, 2012.

Key Blogs

  1. P2 Software and Technology: A blog that highlights the use of technology for public participation/public involvement and decisionmaking purposes.


Key Conferences

  1. Fourth International Conference on Online Deliberation

Key Organizations


Key Skills

What kind of skills do we need for the p2p age (an age of collaboration),

as proposed by Donnie Maclurcan [13]:


Means of Learning and the Self

Individual asset mapping Systems thinking Finding your purpose through strategic questioning The latest science on learning processes and knowledge retention Speed reading Touch typing Mysticism and the Divine Masculine and Divine Feminine within Developing intuition Yoga and breath work Meditation De-cluttering Time management techniques


Community, Family and Leadership

Key lessons from human history Asset-based community development Running an ‘offers and needs market’ Relationship skills Non-violent communication and conflict resolution Diversity sensitivities (including GLBTQI, cultural, religious, disability, age, indigenous/First Nation) Parenting and family dynamics Dynamic teaching and group facilitation Circle work and other decision-making techniques Confident public speaking Singing in harmony and dancing together How to read and play music Holding and participating in sacred rituals Improvisation theatre Storytelling Restorative justice Fun cooperative games for children and communities (including outdoor and card games) Sharing law Effective campaigning and lobbying Child honouring and protection (including an introduction to ADHD, child trauma and special needs) Graphic facilitation Conversational French/Spanish/Mandarin/Arabic Archiving (sound, video, images, stories, items, documents)


Health

Basic anatomy (and terminology), understanding the body’s systems and exercise physiology Injury rehabilitation Holistic approaches to healthcare (including natural, homemade medicinal remedies and birth control) Administering first aid Administering mental health first aid Medicinal herbs Massage (including acupressure) Sleeping well Natural birthing Natural cleaning


Food and Nature

Composting and improving soil quality Setting up a worm farm Growing food Permaculture principles and sector design No-dig gardening Threshing Aquaponics Seed saving and plant propagation Pruning Grafting Ploughing (with animals and vehicles) Identifying invasive species Connecting and working with animals (including husbandry, birthing and basic healthcare) Horsemanship Raising fowl Understanding the weather (and reading a weather map) Disaster preparedness (including earthquakes, sandbagging for floods, and hazard reduction and back-burning along with fire safety) Cooking essentials Vegetarian cooking Bread making Preserving food (canning, drying) Sprouting Fermenting (including brewing, distilling, mead making, winemaking)


Bushcraft

Orienteering Hiking and camping (including the ‘leave no trace’ principles) Tracking Fishing Sourcing water from nature Shelter building Open fire cooking Sourcing food (forest foraging and gleaning) Fire making (including natural fire creation) Rope making and essential knots Hunting and using weapons Animal food preparation


Building, Equipment and Vehicles

Fundamental principles of structural engineering Building structures (including insulation) Coppicing Woodwork Stonework Natural brickmaking Creating natural toilets Smithing Bike maintenance Vehicle maintenance (including mechanics) Boat maintenance (including mechanics) How to operate heavy machinery How to use power tools Using non-power tools Sourcing and installing renewable energy Water/sewage systems design and building (including filtration, drip irrigation, Keyline and swales) Passive solar design Sailing Paddling (kayak and canoe) Swimming and water safety Electronic basics and how to fix electrical faults Amateur radio and setting up a mesh network Using vehicles in extreme conditions (including towing and defensive driving)


Urban-oriented Skills

Urban farming Setting up a rain water collection system Setting up a photovoltaic power generator Dumpster diving


Crafts and Making

Life hacking Up-cycling and making things from scratch (including dyes, soaps and shampoos) Mending, knitting, sewing, crocheting and weaving Tanning (to produce leather) Homemade cosmetics Drawing Painting Pottery


Business

Sustainable business models (including not-for-profit associations and companies, solidarity franchises, producer-, consumer-, worker- and multi-stakeholder cooperatives, community land trusts, benefit corporations, community interest companies) Running an organization Participatory organizing for business (including Sociocracy) Project management Budgeting, bookkeeping, money management and invoicing Information management Sourcing items ethically Blogging Coding Server setup, website design and development (including CMS setup) Using other online tools Setting up and managing a wiki "

(http://postgrowth.org/upskilling-for-post-growth-futures-together/)

Key Tools

Also:

  1. Actions Options Tool: open source peer to peer organizing tool for activist organizations. Here is a screencast which provides a preview of AOT's features
  2. Open Sphere, group facilitation method
  3. Bernie DeKoven explains Coliberation strategies in his book The Well-Played Game
  4. Appropriate Software Foundation: facilities and tools to develop Free Software supports for civil society processes.
  5. Amazee, is a recommended Social Collaboration Platform
  6. Blue Oxen High-Performance Collaboration Pattern Repository: Inspired by Christopher Alexander, this is a repository for collecting, discussing, and refactoring patterns for High-Performance Collaboration.
  7. The Metagovernment Project keeps track of Collaborative Governance Projects and Collaborative Governance Software [14]

Directory

List of participatory processes that should be part of our directory [15]:


Active Listening * Appreciative Inquiry * Area Neighborhood Forum * Arbitration * Arts Based Civic Dialogue * Asset Based Community Development * Backcasting * Bohm Dialogue * Brainstorming * Briefing * Candidate Evaluation Panel * Chime And Stone * Choice Creating * Choice Work * Citizen Advisory Committee * Citizen Committee * Citizen Consensus Council * Citizen Deliberative Council * Citizen Election Forum * Citizen Initiative Review * Citizen Jury * Citizen Panel * Citizen Reflective Council * Citizen Survey Panel * Collaborative Inquiry * Commons Cafe * Community Asset Inventory * Community Consultation Committee * Community Fair * Community Indicator * Community Issues Group * Community Planning * Community Viz * Compassionate Listening * Conflict Transformation * Conflict Work * Consensus Building * Consensus Building Exercise * Consensus Conference * Consensus Organizing * Consensus Participation * Consensus Process * Conversation Cafe * Council Process (see Talking Circle) * Deliberation * Deliberative Dialogue * Deliberative Focus Group * Deliberative Inclusionary Process * Deliberative Opinion Poll (aka Deliberative Polling) * Delphi Study * Design Charrette * Despair And Empowerment Work * Dialogue * Dialogue Mapping * Dynamic Facilitation * Enlightened Communication * Fast Cycle Full Participation * Fish Bowl * Flower Diagram Workshop * Focus Group * Future Search * Gemba Kaizen * Gestures Of Conversational Presence * Group Awareness Exercise * Group Silence * Integrative Conversation * Interactive Strategic Planning * Intergroup Dialogue * Intragroup Dialogue * Large Group Intervention * Listening Circle (see Talking Circle) * Listening Project * Multi Objective Decision Support System (MODSS) * Multiple Viewpoint Drama * Neighborhood Policy Jury * Open Question Circle * Open Sentences Practice * Open Space Technology * Participative Design Workshop * Participatory Budgeting * Participatory Idealized Design * Participatory Research * Participatory Rural Appraisal (aka Participatory Research And Action) (PRA) * Process Worldwork * Regulatory Negotiation * Residents Feedback Panel * Restorative Justice * Story Circle * Sustained Dialogue * Symbolic Dialogue * Talking Circle * Transformative Mediation * Widening Circles Exercise * Wisdom Council * World Cafe *

Pages in category "Facilitation"

The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 696 total.

(previous page) (next page)

*

A

B

C

D

(previous page) (next page)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/index.php?title=Category:Facilitation&oldid=146378"