Category:Peerproperty: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
http://www.re-public.gr/en/?p=87
'''''"Peer production, peer governance, peer property"''''',
 
Excerpt of Article by Michel Bauwens - link : http://www.re-public.gr/en/?p=87


Excerpt of Article '''''"Peer production, peer governance, peer property"''''',
by Michel Bauwens:


''"Peer to peer social processes are bottom-up processes whereby agents in a distributed network can freely engage in common pursuits, without external coercion. It is important to realize that distributed systems differ from decentralized systems, essentially because in the latter, the hubs are obligatory, while in the former, they are the result of voluntary choices. Distributed networks do have constraints, internal coercion, that are the conditions for the group to operate, and they may be embedded in the technical infrastructure, the social norms, or legal rules.''
''"Peer to peer social processes are bottom-up processes whereby agents in a distributed network can freely engage in common pursuits, without external coercion. It is important to realize that distributed systems differ from decentralized systems, essentially because in the latter, the hubs are obligatory, while in the former, they are the result of voluntary choices. Distributed networks do have constraints, internal coercion, that are the conditions for the group to operate, and they may be embedded in the technical infrastructure, the social norms, or legal rules.''

Revision as of 18:49, 5 January 2009

"Peer production, peer governance, peer property",

Excerpt of Article by Michel Bauwens - link : http://www.re-public.gr/en/?p=87


"Peer to peer social processes are bottom-up processes whereby agents in a distributed network can freely engage in common pursuits, without external coercion. It is important to realize that distributed systems differ from decentralized systems, essentially because in the latter, the hubs are obligatory, while in the former, they are the result of voluntary choices. Distributed networks do have constraints, internal coercion, that are the conditions for the group to operate, and they may be embedded in the technical infrastructure, the social norms, or legal rules.


P2P social processes more precisely engender:


1) peer production: wherever a group of peers decided to engage in the production of a common resource


2) peer governance: the means they choose to govern themselves while they engage in such pursuit


3) peer property: the institutional and legal framework they choose to guard against the private appropriation of this common work; this usually takes the form of non-exclusionary forms of universal common property"

Subcategories

This category has the following 2 subcategories, out of 2 total.

L

S

Pages in category "Peerproperty"

The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 837 total.

(previous page) (next page)

C

(previous page) (next page)