Category:Crypto Governance: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
unknown (talk)
No edit summary
unknown (talk)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
New section on the governance of virtual communities, peer production communities but especially blockchain-type collaborations.
New section on the governance of virtual communities, peer production communities but especially blockchain-type collaborations.


=Key Articles=
 
=Quotes=
 
"Prevalent among communities forming around blockchain technology more specifically is '''an emphasis on relegating governance to automated enforcement by a protocol''', coordinating the otherwise free actions of actors in the network. More than a technology, blockchain has come to represent a powerful narrative and governance ideology (Reijers and Coeckelbergh, 2016), promising the possibility of automating governance, understood as the coordination of individual actions at aggregate scales. This idea has manifested in different approaches to governance in blockchain communities, which we discuss in part one of this article as materialist, designer, and emergent ideas, and approaches to governance relating these to three evolutions of governance theory (Mayntz 2003). Blockchain is a particularly fruitful context for discussing dissensus as it is navigated by online communities because, as an ideology, it so explicitly seeks to achieve consensus through technological arrangements."
 
- Kate Beecroft et al. [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fhumd.2021.641731/full]
 
 
 
=Key Resources=
 
==Key Articles==


* [[Limitations of Cryptoeconomic Governance Mechanisms]]. By Nathan Schneider.
* [[Limitations of Cryptoeconomic Governance Mechanisms]]. By Nathan Schneider.

Revision as of 09:09, 28 November 2021

New section on the governance of virtual communities, peer production communities but especially blockchain-type collaborations.


Quotes

"Prevalent among communities forming around blockchain technology more specifically is an emphasis on relegating governance to automated enforcement by a protocol, coordinating the otherwise free actions of actors in the network. More than a technology, blockchain has come to represent a powerful narrative and governance ideology (Reijers and Coeckelbergh, 2016), promising the possibility of automating governance, understood as the coordination of individual actions at aggregate scales. This idea has manifested in different approaches to governance in blockchain communities, which we discuss in part one of this article as materialist, designer, and emergent ideas, and approaches to governance relating these to three evolutions of governance theory (Mayntz 2003). Blockchain is a particularly fruitful context for discussing dissensus as it is navigated by online communities because, as an ideology, it so explicitly seeks to achieve consensus through technological arrangements."

- Kate Beecroft et al. [1]


Key Resources

Key Articles

Pages in category "Crypto Governance"

The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 410 total.

(previous page) (next page)

B

C

(previous page) (next page)