Transvestment: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
An autonomous, communal economic entity must constantly endeavour to generate net positive transvestment, which would mean greater [[exvestment]] from the capitalist domain than the value capitalist agents are able/allowed to extract from the community." | An autonomous, communal economic entity must constantly endeavour to generate net positive transvestment, which would mean greater [[exvestment]] from the capitalist domain than the value capitalist agents are able/allowed to extract from the community." | ||
=Discussion= | |||
Tiberius Brastaviceanu: | |||
"Michel Bauwens wrote: | |||
- "In addition, we create ‘transvestment’ vehicles, which allow the acceptance of capital, as disciplined by the new commons and market forms that we develop through peer production, this creates a flow of value from the system of capital to the system of the commons economy. Faced with a crisis of capital accumulation, it is entirely realistic to expect a stream of value which seeks a place in the commons economy. Instead of the cooptation of the commons economy by capital, in the form of the netarchical capitalist platforms which capture value from the commons, we coopt capital inside the commons, and subject it to its rules." | |||
We already see this with SENSORICA's service experience. If you [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ABmC6YJsszlIPoL-YXU3GF-PLHY0tmQdocBExswh7Lw/edit click the link] you'll see how SENSORICA is doing it. But the paragraph that is pertinent here is the following: | |||
"This mutually beneficial economic relationship between classical institutions and SENSORICA, as an open innovation and peer production network, can be seen as a bridge between the classical capitalist economy and the p2p economy, as a channel for transfer of resources from the old economy to the new. " | |||
I don't believe in protective measures, like reciprocity-based licenses. We simply do more and better with less. What I see is that corporations that interact with will be forced to adopt our open innovation model, because this is the only option they have to remain relevant in their market. In doing that, they shed functions to the crowd. In other words, the era of outsourcing turns into an era of crowdsourcing, which is, in Michel's terms, believe it or not, the "commonification" of the corporation : ) Well, if you don't believe me, we can sit down and I can show you how it manifests itself. In other words, yes, I see clear and tangible signs of the corporation starts to subject itself to the rules of commons-based peer production." | |||
| Line 19: | Line 34: | ||
[[Category:P2P Accounting]] | [[Category:P2P Accounting]] | ||
[[Category:Peerproperty]] | |||
Revision as of 03:45, 15 June 2016
= " the transfer value from the system of capital to the system of peer production ?"
Description
"Transvestment (Dmytri Kleiner & Baruch Gottlieb) is a macro-economic accounting identity which elaborates the exchange of value between domains of the economy under control of capitalist modes of production and autonomous domains which outside of direct capitalist value extraction practices.
An autonomous, communal economic entity must constantly endeavour to generate net positive transvestment, which would mean greater exvestment from the capitalist domain than the value capitalist agents are able/allowed to extract from the community."
Discussion
Tiberius Brastaviceanu:?
"Michel Bauwens wrote:
- "In addition, we create ‘transvestment’ vehicles, which allow the acceptance of capital, as disciplined by the new commons and market forms that we develop through peer production, this creates a flow of value from the system of capital to the system of the commons economy. Faced with a crisis of capital accumulation, it is entirely realistic to expect a stream of value which seeks a place in the commons economy. Instead of the cooptation of the commons economy by capital, in the form of the netarchical capitalist platforms which capture value from the commons, we coopt capital inside the commons, and subject it to its rules."
We already see this with SENSORICA's service experience. If you ??click the link you'll see how SENSORICA is doing it. But the paragraph that is pertinent here is the following:
"This mutually beneficial economic relationship between classical institutions and SENSORICA, as an open innovation and peer production network, can be seen as a bridge between the classical capitalist economy and the p2p economy, as a channel for transfer of resources from the old economy to the new. "
I don't believe in protective measures, like reciprocity-based licenses. We simply do more and better with less. What I see is that corporations that interact with will be forced to adopt our open innovation model, because this is the only option they have to remain relevant in their market. In doing that, they shed functions to the crowd. In other words, the era of outsourcing turns into an era of crowdsourcing, which is, in Michel's terms, believe it or not, the "commonification" of the corporation : ) Well, if you don't believe me, we can sit down and I can show you how it manifests itself. In other words, yes, I see clear and tangible signs of the corporation starts to subject itself to the rules of commons-based peer production."