Toward a Common Theory of Value: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
=Directory- | =Directory-= | ||
* Part One, http://www.kosmosjournal.org/article/toward-a-common-theory-of-value-part-one-common-being/ | * Part One, http://www.kosmosjournal.org/article/toward-a-common-theory-of-value-part-one-common-being/ | ||
=Excerpts= | |||
==On [[Commons Economics]]== | |||
James Quilligan: | |||
"A commons-based economics raises the possibility of experiencing | |||
value through the practical relationships that arise among individuals, | |||
the resources of the world, and that which exists between | |||
people and the world. This challenges the (neo)liberal orthodoxy | |||
of Immanuel Kant, who said that the non-empirical nature of | |||
metaphysics lies beyond immediate experience, whether external | |||
or internal. By revealing the connection between outer and inner | |||
experience, which are two completely different sources of knowledge, | |||
the commons offer analytic constructs which have previously | |||
been neglected, preventing economics from reflecting the | |||
real human condition. A commons-based economy arises from | |||
where we live and how and what we do. These articles propose a | |||
common turn—a theory of value bringing right understanding of | |||
the world without having to reach for a final explanation of its | |||
existence or rely on some parallel universe of economic abstractions. | |||
The delineation of this common worldview, arising from both | |||
outer and inner experience, provides the foundation of a new essentialism | |||
in economics and even suggests the outlines of a teleological | |||
structure (an emergent stage development sequence in | |||
economics will be explored in subsequent articles). It also provides | |||
a way of examining the premises of the Market State and understanding | |||
how the present social order may be transformed at all | |||
levels—local, state, interstate, regional and global—through institutions | |||
and policies of shared production and shared governance." | |||
(http://www.kosmosjournal.org/wp-content/article-pdfs/toward-a-common-theory-of-value-part-one-common-being.pdf) | |||
=More Information= | |||
* [[Commons Economics]] | |||
* [[Value]] | |||
Revision as of 07:26, 4 July 2015
= series in Kosmos Journal by James Quilligan
Description
"This series of articles will attempt to reconceptualize the social and natural order of economics through an analysis of the commons—the natural, genetic, physical, social, cultural and intellectual resources which people manage by negotiating their own norms and rules. (For brevity’s sake, Part One uses the term ‘commons’ loosely to refer to both self-organized commons and unorganized common pool resources—a distinction which will be spelled out in subsequent articles.) The recurring theme in these writings is the creation of a commons-based economy which expresses a more inclusive type of value than in traditional economics. A common theory of value—rooted in philosophy, psychology, sociology, anthropology, linguistics, communication, organizational behavior, technology, history, culture, environmentalism, economics, law, and social and political theory—will explore many of the leading ontological presuppositions in our present belief systems."
Directory-
- Part One, http://www.kosmosjournal.org/article/toward-a-common-theory-of-value-part-one-common-being/
Excerpts
On Commons Economics
James Quilligan:
"A commons-based economics raises the possibility of experiencing value through the practical relationships that arise among individuals, the resources of the world, and that which exists between people and the world. This challenges the (neo)liberal orthodoxy of Immanuel Kant, who said that the non-empirical nature of metaphysics lies beyond immediate experience, whether external or internal. By revealing the connection between outer and inner experience, which are two completely different sources of knowledge, the commons offer analytic constructs which have previously been neglected, preventing economics from reflecting the real human condition. A commons-based economy arises from where we live and how and what we do. These articles propose a common turn—a theory of value bringing right understanding of the world without having to reach for a final explanation of its existence or rely on some parallel universe of economic abstractions.
The delineation of this common worldview, arising from both outer and inner experience, provides the foundation of a new essentialism in economics and even suggests the outlines of a teleological structure (an emergent stage development sequence in economics will be explored in subsequent articles). It also provides a way of examining the premises of the Market State and understanding how the present social order may be transformed at all levels—local, state, interstate, regional and global—through institutions and policies of shared production and shared governance." (http://www.kosmosjournal.org/wp-content/article-pdfs/toward-a-common-theory-of-value-part-one-common-being.pdf)