Generative Justice

= "relations of open reciprocity, communal sharing, gift-giving and voluntary collaboration allowed value to circulate in its unalienated forms, including labor power, political expression and interspecies ecological exchanges". [1]

Description

1. Ron Eglash:

"Marx proposed that capitalism’s destructive force is caused, at root, by the alienation of labor value from its generators. Environmentalists have added the concept of unalienated ecological value, and rights activists added the unalienated expressive value of free speech, sexuality, spirituality, etc. Marx’s vision for restoring an unalienated world by top-down economic governance was never fulfilled. But in the last 30 years, new forms of social justice have emerged that operate as “bottom-up”. Peer-to-peer production such as open source software or wikipedia has challenged the corporate grip on IP in a “gift exchange” of labor value; community based agroecology establishes a kind of gift exchange with our nonhuman allies in nature. DIY citizenship from feminist makerspaces to queer biohacking has profound implications for a new materialism of the “knowledge commons”; and restorative approaches to civil rights can challenge the prison-industrial complex. In contrast to top-down “distributive justice,” all of the above are cases of bottom-up or “generative justice”." (http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/52847/49997)

2. Ron Eglash:

"in contrast to Marx’s theory of distributive justice, we seek a theory of generative justice: one in which society is best served when value extraction is minimized, and when the communities who are generating value—not Adam Smith’s capital or Marx’s state—are in charge of its circulation. If we phrase this in the language of “rights”—which is not the only way to think about it--we can define generative justice as follows:The universal right to generate unalienated value and directly participate in its benefits; the rights of value generators to create their own conditions of production; and the rights of communities of value generation to nurture self-sustaining paths for its circulation." (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304670572_Of_Marx_and_Makers_an_Historical_Perspective_on_Generative_Justice)

3. Taylor C. Dotson & James E. Wilcox:

"The generative justice model, in contrast, proposes “closing the loop.” That is, value generated by labor and/or nature are to be governed by the people and recirculated within the systems doing the producing, rather than redistributed by a centralized state. By allowing values to be circulated, as opposed to simply extracted, generative capacity is built at the roots or from the “bottom-up” to a greater extent. Eglash and Garvey (2014) offer up the Open Source movement as well as the self-organized, decentralized irrigation systems used by Balinese farmers for centuries as exemplary cases. In both instances, generated values produced by members of a community are largely circulated and enjoyed within that same community." (http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/52840/50002)

More Information

• An Introduction to Generative Justice. By Ron Eglash.

• Historical Perspective on Generative Justice. By Ron Eglash.

• EGLASH, R., & GARVEY, C. (2014). Basins of attraction for generative justice. In S. Banerjee et al.

(Eds.), Chaos Theory in Politics (pp. 75-88). Germany: Springer Science.

• EGLASH, R. (2014, April 15). Generative justice: The revolution will be self-organized. Tikkun.

Retrieved from <http://www.tikkun.org/nextgen/generative-justice-the-revolution-will-be-self-organized>