Accessibility: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added three categories)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 23: Line 23:
[[Category:Encyclopedia]]
[[Category:Encyclopedia]]


[[Category:Open Governance]]
[[Category:Peergovernance]]


[[Category:Open Software]]
[[Category:Free Software]]
 
[[Category:Open Source Everything]]

Latest revision as of 08:42, 2 February 2016


= considered as form of Openness

Description

West and O’Mahony:

“Transparency meant that the code was publicly available, that most of the software production process was discussed on public mailing lists or discussion boards, and that the software release cycle and goals were also provided on the community website.”


“The second type of openness sponsors considered when designing a sponsored community was the degree of accessibility — the amount of control sponsors would relinquish to the community. An accessible community not only provides visibility, but allows some outsiders to gain access to either the project’s code repository, community planning processes, or strategic decision-making.” (http://www.joelwest.org/Papers/WestOMahony2008-WP.pdf)


More Information

See: Openness in Open Source Software Development‎