Fourth Order Cybernetics: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " =Description= Can we Define a Fourth Order System? * Fourth Order Cybernetics considers what happens when a system redefines itself. * It focuses on the integrati...")
 
unknown (talk)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Description=
=Description=


Line 41: Line 39:
=More Information=
=More Information=


* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybernetics: interdisciplinary study of the structure of regulatory systems.  
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybernetics: interdisciplinary study of the structure of regulatory systems.
 


[[Category:Cybernetics]]
[[Category:Complexity]]
[[Category:Relational]]
[[Category:Relational]]
[[Category:Governance]]
[[Category:Intelligence]]
[[Category:Mutual Coordination]]
[[Category:Technology]]
[[Category:Protocols and Algorithms]]
[[Category:Network Theory]]

Latest revision as of 07:12, 4 July 2023

Description

Can we Define a Fourth Order System?


  • Fourth Order Cybernetics considers what happens when a system redefines itself.
  • It focuses on the integration of a system within its larger, co-defining context.
   * The 4th Order system is contextualised, embedded and integrated into the context
   * It can thereby become representative for the integrated context.
   * It therefore operates at two levels simultaneously.
   * It is no longer a system, but a meta-system.
   * It operates both as a system in its context, and as a system that is part of the context.
   * It thereby has the capacity to integrate and disintegrate the contact between both.
   * It is an active, interactive, reactive and ideally representative agent in/for/with/of that context.
   * This requires a different level of description: not in relationship to the system, but to the relationship between systems.
   * The Interface is now the system of reference, instead of the system.
   * This relationship is the basis of the interaction.
   * The transformation is the basis of the processing.
   * The integration is the basis of integrity.
   * The significant feature of the meta-system is its duality.
   * The essence is the same, but the relevance brings inversion.
   * The metasystem is an object; the meta-system is a subject.
   * Whereas a system can normally be described, a meta-system can only be experienced
   * The ‘pillars’ in this transition are the relationships (Second Order) and the interactions (Third Order).
   * Fourth Order Design would integrate all activities in an inverted, contextualised form
   * It would be embedded in its context and responsible in, and for, its actions
   * The system would act as meta-system and design would act as meta-design.
   * This represents the level of self-awareness.
   * It is where the system reflects upon itself and steers itself (i.e. is autopoietic).
   * These attributes facilitate self-regeneration, thus self-healing.
   * They can therefore be managed to enable a healing process.

(http://attainable-utopias.org/tiki/FourthOrderCybernetics)

More Information