Venture Communism: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Venture Commune's'''


URL = http://www.thetransitioner.org/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=WhatIsVentureCommunism
'''= a ownership system and political economy system based on [[Venture Commune]]s, developed by Dmytri Kleiner and the [[Telekommunisten]] group.'''


See: [[Venture Commune]]


=Description=
"Venture communists promote the ideal of workers owning their own means of production"
 
A proposal for `venture communism'
 
"'''A Venture Commune is a joint stock corporation, much like the Venture Capital Funds of the Capitalist class, however it has four distinct properties''' which transform it into an effective vehicle for revolutionary worker's struggle.
 
 
'''1 -- A Share In The Venture Commune Can Only Be Acquired By Contributions Of Labour, and Not Property.'''
 
In other words only by working is ownership earned, not by contributing Land, Capital or even Money. Only Labour.
 
It is this contributed labour which represents the initial Investment capacity of the Commune.
 
The Commune Issues its own currency, based on the value of the labour pledges it has.
 
It then invests this currency into the private enterprises which it intends to purchase or fund, these Enterprises thus become owned by the Commune, in the same way that Enterprises which receive Venture Capital become owned by a Venture Capital Fund.
 
'''2 -- The Venture Commune's Return On Investment From Its Enterprises Is Derived From Rent and Not Income.'''
 
As condition of investment, the Enterprise agrees to not own its own
property, neither Land nor Capital, but rather to rent Land and Capital from the Commune.
 
The Commune, unlike a Venture Capital Fund, never takes a share of the income of the Enterprise nor of any of its workers.
 
The Commune finances the acquisition of Land and Capital by issuing Bonds, and then Rents the Land and Capital to its Enterprises, or an Enterprise can sell whatever Land and Capital it acquires through other means to the Commune, and in turn Rent it.
 
In this way Property is always owned Mutually by all the members of the Commune, however all workers and the Enterprises that employ them retain the entire product of their labour.
 
 
'''3 -- The Venture Commune Is Owned Equally By All Its Members.'''
 
 
Each member can have one share, and only one share. Thus although each worker is able to earn different prices for their labour from the Enterprises, based on the demand for their labour, each worker may never earn any more than one share in the ownership of the Commune itself, and therefore can never accumulate a disproportionate share of the proceeds of Property.
 
Ownership of Property can therefore never be concentrated in fewer and fewer hands and used to exploit the worker as in Capitalist corporations.
 
 
'''4 -- All Those Who Apply Their Labour To the Property of the Commune Must Be Eligible For Membership In The Commune.'''
 
The Commune may not refuse membership to any Labour employed by any of its enterprises that work with the Land and Capital controlled by the commune. In this way Commune members can not exploit outside wage earners, and the labour needs of the Enterprise will ensure that each Commune continues to grow and accept new members."
 
=Discussion=
 
Dmytri Kleiner:
 
"I see venture communism in two initial phases, in the first phase
proto-venture-communist enterprises must break the Iron law and then join
together to found a venture commune.
 
In a mature venture commune, cost-recovery is simply achieved by using
rent-sharing to efficiently
allocate property to its most productive use, thereby ensuring mutual
accumulation. Rent sharing works by renting the property for it's full
market value to member enterprises and then distributing the proceeds of
this rent equally among all commune members.
 
Investment, when  required by exogenous exchange, is funded by selling
bonds at auction. Endogenous liquidity is achieved through the use of
mutual credit.
 
However in the initial phase there is no property to rent-share and the
demand for the bonds is likely to be insufficient, thus the only way the
enterprise can succeed is to break the iron law and somehow capitalize and
earn more than subsistence costs, making mutual accumulation possible.
 
IMO, there are two requirements for breaking the iron law:
 
a) The enterprise must have highly skilled creative labour, so that the
labour itself can capture scarcity rents, i.e. artists, software
developers.
 
b) Production must be based on what I call "commodity capital," that is
Capital that is a common input to most, if not all, industries, and
therefore is often subsidized by public and private foundations and
available on the market for below it's actual cost. Examples of this are
telecommunications and transportation infrastructure, both of which have
been heavily subsidized.
 
Also, a third requirement for me, although not implied by the simple
economic logic, is that the initial products are of general use to market
segments I believe are most directly agents for social change, i.e. other
peer producers, activists, diasporic/translocal communities and the
informal economy broadly.
 
Also, I would like to note that while the initial enterprises depend on
complex labour and should focus on products of strategic benefit, a mature
venture commune can incorporate all types of labour and provide all types
of goods and services once the implementation of rent-sharing, bond-auction
and mutual-credit is achieved."
(Oekonux mailing list, January 2008)
 


=More Information=
=More Information=


"Venture communists promote the ideal of workers owning their own means of production, to learn more about the theoretical, practical and philosophical implications of this mode of production, we invite you to explore these resources:
* The [[Telekommunisten Manifesto]] [http://telekommunisten.net/the-telekommunist-manifesto/]
 
   
* http://www.mutualist.org
   
* http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/proudhon.htm
   
* http://www.ellerman.org/Davids-Stuff/AboutDavidEllerman.htm
   
* http://flag.blackened.net/daver/anarchism/iron_fist.html
   
* http://www.thetransitioner.org/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=VentureCommunism
   
* http://www.iww.org/culture/official/preamble.shtml
   
* http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/hodgskin/labdef.txt
 
 
Telekommunisten.net is a company working on that model, at http://www.telekommunisten.net/
 
 
[[Category:Encyclopedia]]


[[Category:Business]]
* Video: [[Ian Wright on Venture Communism]]


[[Category:Politics]]
[[Category:Movements]]


[[Category:Governance]]
[[Category:Commons Economics]]

Latest revision as of 10:12, 4 July 2017

= a ownership system and political economy system based on Venture Communes, developed by Dmytri Kleiner and the Telekommunisten group.

See: Venture Commune

"Venture communists promote the ideal of workers owning their own means of production"

More Information