Open Source Social Networking: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(added links related wikilinks) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
"There are two aspects of "openness" (or freedom) that affect social networking; the license covering the source code of social networking software, and whether the internetworking protocol used is proprietary ("data silo" or "walled garden"), or a free/ open standard (made up one or more free/ open protocols), allowing for "federated" or [[Distributed_Social_Network_Projects|"distributed" social networks]]." | "There are two aspects of "openness" (or freedom) that affect social networking; the license covering the source code of social networking software, and whether the internetworking protocol used is proprietary ("data silo" or "walled garden"), or a free/ open standard (made up one or more free/ open protocols), allowing for "federated" or [[Distributed_Social_Network_Projects|"distributed" social networks]]." | ||
== Related == | |||
* [[Distributed Social Network Projects]] | |||
* [[Federated Social Web]] | |||
* [[Federated Social Networks]] | |||
* [[P2P Communication Software]] | |||
* [[P2P Web Hosting]] | |||
[[Category:Open]] | [[Category:Open]] | ||
Revision as of 14:13, 22 October 2019
= Discussing open source social networking options such as elgg, buddypress, drupal and others
URL = http://testbp.org/groups/open-source-social-networking-1189558228
Discussion
--Strypey (talk) 04:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC):
"There are two aspects of "openness" (or freedom) that affect social networking; the license covering the source code of social networking software, and whether the internetworking protocol used is proprietary ("data silo" or "walled garden"), or a free/ open standard (made up one or more free/ open protocols), allowing for "federated" or "distributed" social networks."