Entropy

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search

= the second law of thermodynamics, also known as the law of entropy

Description

"The second law of thermodynamics states that the “entropy” of a “closed” system always increases. This means that such a system will spontaneously “run down” as all available energy is used up and eventually there is no potential for further useful work. A system which no longer has the capacity to do useful work because all the energy available to it has been used up is said to be in a state of maximum entropy.” (http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2186/2062)


Entropy vs Negentropy

Robert Hanna:

"In physics, entropy is the unavailability of thermal energy for conversion into causal action or work.

Sometimes, entropy is described as “disorder,” but this is conceptually misleading: actually, an increase in entropy is an increase in the amount of thermal energy that’s in a cold or causally inert state, hence it’s an overall ordering or structuring of thermal energy that’s less complex, less differentiated, and less variegated — as it were, a more boring ordering or structuring of thermal energy, a dispersal of thermal energy — whereby the natural universe is in a partial or total equilibrium state, i.e., a partially or totally settled state, with nothing coming in or going out across the impermeable borders of that state, such that nothing can be be done or happen. Now, when natural systems spontaneously evolve so that they causally operate entropically, let’s call that natural mechanism.

Contrariwise, negative entropy or negentropy is the negation or reversal of entropy, hence it’s the availability of thermal energy for conversion into causal action or work, sometimes also called “free energy,” or “order,” but those labels are also conceptually misleading; actually, an increase in negentropy is an increase in the amount of thermal energy that’s in a hot or causally empowered state, hence it’s an overall ordering or structuring of thermal energy that’s more complex, more differentiated, and more variegated — as it were, a more exciting ordering or structuring of thermal energy, a concentration ofthermal energy — whereby the natural universe is in a partial or total non-equilibrium state, i.e., a partially or totally unsettled state, with things coming in and going out across the permeable membranes of that state, such that things can be done or happen. Now, when natural systems spontaneously evolve so that they causally operate negentropically, let’s call that natural creativity."

(https://www.academia.edu/91465069/A_Philosophical_Case_For_Holding_That_The_2nd_Law_of_Thermodynamics_is_Only_a_Special_Law_of_Nature_and_Not_a_Universal_Law_November_2022_version_)


Example

“A useful analogy to describe the second law is an hour glass [16]. An hour glass can be considered a closed system in that no sand enters the glass and none leaves. But although the quantity of sand in the hour glass is constant, the bottom chamber is filling up and the top chamber is becoming empty. The sand in the bottom chamber may be seen as a measure of the amount of entropy in the system. Sand in the top chamber is capable of doing work by falling, like water at the top of a waterfall, while sand in the bottom chamber has spent its capacity to do work. The second law therefore states that whenever work is done the amount of usable energy in the system declines, which, in the case of a closed system, means that the system will eventually run down.”

(http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2186/2062)


Discussion: The Negative Entropy of Open Systems

Mike Chege:

““Open” systems, on the other hand, unlike closed systems, receive an inflow of material and energy from their environment so that they do not run down. In the terminology of the physicist Erwin Schrödinger (1945), open systems receive “negative entropy” from the environment. Biological systems such as human beings are good examples of open systems.

Because every process of production is, at bottom, a transformation of energy and matter, it should come as no surprise that a number of economists have found the laws of thermodynamics to be concepts with considerable relevance for economics. In fact, interest in the laws of thermodynamics has led to the rise of an approach known as Thermoeconomics. Approaches within thermoeconomics range from from those that seek to develop highly technical analytical models of the economy based on the laws of thermodynamics, to those that view thermodynamic concepts as analogies and metaphors. While the analogies–and–metaphors approach may not allow us to make exact and deductive scientific statements about economic systems, it still has merit as a heuristic, with the capacity to allow us to see economic phenomena in a new light and hence stimulate research in new and potentially fruitful directions. In this essay we will be taking the analogies–and–metaphors approach.

So, how do we incorporate the entropy law into our model? If we acknowledge that any process of economic production is dependent on close interaction with the environment from which it extracts materials and energy, then it follows that any process of economic production that remains isolated from its surroundings, in the sense that it does not receive any inputs from its surroundings, will eventually succumb to “economic entropy.” In other words, it will eventually become incapable of generating any more outputs just as a thermodynamic system that has used up all its energy is incapable of doing any more work.”

(http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2186/2062)