"What makes cryptocurrencies so powerful is that we can use them to express different social and economic agendas and to measure things differently; to implement different incentives and record their effects. Economy opens as a design question. This is the precondition for building different social and economic agendas and de-naturalising the rule of private and individual measures of social contribution, materialising in concepts like ‘profit’ and ‘efficiency’."
- Dick Bryan and Akseli Virtanen 
"Current attempts to develop new kinds of cryptocurrencies must be judged, valued and rethought on the basis of this simple question as posed by Andrea Fumagalli: Is the currency created not limited solely to being a means of exchange, but can it also affect the entire cycle of money creation – from finance to exchange? Does it allow speculation and hoarding, or does it promote investment in post-capitalist projects and facilitate freedom from exploitation, autonomy of organization etc.?"
- Tiziana Terranova 
From a DAO to a DPO, i.e. a Distributed_Programmable_Organization
"The Distributed Autonomous Organization evolves toward the Distributed Programmable Organization. Post-blockchain architectures are already emerging that have even more flexible, lower-cost, rhizomatic architectures operating on the peer-to-peer model. These make it possible to design alternative models embodying an ethos of sustainable economic and social cooperation that is integrally built into the systems architecture at all levels.
These developments open new possibilities for collective projects to invent their own self-sustaining creative economies, operating not in competition with each other but in a shared, open-source environment based on notions of the “common”."
- SenseLab 
Encoding the neoliberal subject (methodological individualism)
"What kinds of subjectivity do we want to algorithmically inscribe into our systems? Blockchain start-ups begin from the assumption that there is no trust and no community, only individual economic agents acting in self-interest. Fair enough, you might think, it’s precisely the fact that projects like Ethereum engineer confidence and provide economic incentives for contribution that may distinguish it from other services like Freenet. But it also proceeds from a perspective that already presumes a neoliberal subject and an economic mode of governance in the face of social and/or political problems. ‘How do we manage and incentivise individual competitive economic agents?’ In doing so, it not only codes for that subject, we might argue that it also reproduces that subject."
- Rachel O'Dwyer 
- Please read this very good overview of Metacurrency / Holochain and Economic Space Agency projects: The state of the art of co-designing digital ledger technologies for commons and common good. By Dan Diojdescu. 
- Most Cryptoeconomics Do Not Challenge Neoclassical Premises + Potential of Cryptotokens as Innovative Units of Account
Pages in category "Crypto Economy"
The following 73 pages are in this category, out of 73 total.
- Co-Designing Digital Ledger Technologies for Commons
- Commons Engine
- Competency Network
- Conceptual Implications of Legal Bots for Future Blockchain Infrastructure
- Considering the Bitcoin Digital Currency as a Commons
- Continuous Organization
- Creating a Membrane between the Commons and the Market
- Crypto Constitutionalism
- Crypto Economy
- Crypto Model for Crowdfunding
- Crypto Universal Basic Income Projects
- Cryptoeconomic Primitive
- Cryptoeconomics as Commons Economics
- Cryptoeconomics Reading List
- Cryptoeconomics Working Sessions at NYU Stern
- Cryptoeconomy of Affect
- Cryptonetworks for Labor
- Cyborg Forest
- Decentralization as a Means for Developers and other Stakeholders to Take Back Control from Centralized Platforms
- Decentralized Autonomous Organization
- Distributed Autonomous Organizations
- Distributed Income Support Cooperatives
- Distributed Ledgers
- Distributed Programmable Organization
- Distributed Valerism