Cryptoeconomic Governance Innovations

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Overview

List compiled by Nathan Schneider:

• Dynamic decision-making processes that evaluate preferences in nearlyreal time (Beck et al., 2018; Reijers et al., 2018)

• Voting systems unavailable in conventional politics or business (Kar-jalainen, 2020)

• Mechanisms for incentive alignment among diverse participants (Becket al., 2018; Karjalainen, 2020)6

• Algorithmic dispute resolution (Barnett & Treleaven, 2018)

• Permissionless participation (Beck et al., 2018)

• Widely shared accountability and distribution of benefits (Beck et al.,2018; Fritsch, 2019)

• Self-enforcing security and censorship resistance (De Filippi et al., 2020)

• Sovereignty from external control or regulation (De Filippi & Wright,2018; Duffy, 2017; Manski & Manski, 2018)

• Transparency of on-chain activity (Cila et al., 2020)

• Competitive markets for governance (Alston, 2019)

(https://osf.io/wzf85/?view_only=a10581ae9a804aa197ac39ebbba05766)