Russian World-Systems Analysis School
= Jack Goldstone calls it the Russian global-historical systems school, and credits them with a synthesis of the great debate around the Great Divergence vs the Great Convergence, which is about the reasons for the Rise of the West [/https://www.sociostudies.org/upload/sociostudies.org/journal/seh/2016_2/194-200.pdf]
Contextual Quote
“Within the framework of the analyses of the World System future development Russian political Globalistics analysts attempt to answer the following questions:
- What are the implications of the economic weakening of the USA as the World System center?
- Will the future World System have a leader?
- Will it experience a global governance deficit?
- Will world fragmentation increase?
They analyze some crucial events of the present, which could be regarded as precursors of forthcoming fundamental changes. They analyze some crucial events of the present, which could be regarded as precursors of forthcoming fundamental changes (see below). They also consider some global scenarios of the World System's near future. During the struggle for a place in organizing and operating the new world order, an epoch of new coalitions will come, which will outline the contours of a new political landscape for a considerably long period. Probably, for some time the mobility of partnerships within the World System will increase, the arising coalitions may turn out to be chimerical, ephemeral, or fantastic. In the course of search for most stable, advantageous, and adequate organizational supranational forms various and even rapidly changing intermediary forms may occur, where the players of the world and regional political arenas will search for most advantageous and convenient blocks and agreements. However, some new unions and associations may eventually turn from temporary into constant ones and take specific supranational forms. So a new world order will gradually be established. “
- Leonid Grinin and Andrej Korotayev [1]
In Defense of Multi-Evolutionism or Non-Linear Evolution Theory
"The notion of evolution is not popular in contemporary Anthropology. Many researchers do not use it preferring to write about transformation, transit, or change. Evolution for them is synonymous to dogmatic understanding of human history (Yoffee 2005; Pauketat 2008). However, even critics of evolutionism do not appear to reject the very fact of continuous social change. In prehistory people were hunters and gatherers and were integrated in small bands. Later some of them experienced sedentarization and transition to food production, began to found towns and invent complex tools. It would be ridiculous to reject such changes. Another point is that contemporary vision of cultural transformations differs greatly from the naïve ideas of the 19th century evolutionists (see, e.g., Earle 2002; Claessen 2000; Carneiro 2003, Marcus 2008; Hanks, Lin-duff 2009; Earle, Kristiansen 2010 etc.). Contemporary approaches are more flexible and are based on a much more considerable set of evidence. That is why it would be wrong to criticize the scholars of the past for their knowledge of something worse than ours. They ought to be estimated in comparison with their contemporaries. So, we believe that the notion of evolution has a right to exist, and for already several decades we have been elaborating the ideas that can be called “new wave evolutionism”, or Multi-Evolutionism or Non-Linear Evolution Theory)."
- A_Korotayev_and_D_Bondarenko et al. [2]
Directory
of articles and materials in our wiki:
(status: add works by Korotayev and Turchin)
Books
World Systems Evolution
- Great Divergence vs Great Convergence: * Book: GREAT DIVERGENCE AND GREAT CONVERGENCE. A Global Perspective. By Grinin, Leonid; Korotayev, Andrey. Springer,
- Big History Perspective on Evolution, i.e. the Book: EVOLUTION: A Big History Perspective. Edited by: Edited by Leonid E. Grinin, Аndrey V. Korotayev, Barry H. Rodrigue. Volgograd: ‘Uchitel’ 2023
- Comparison of Biological and Social Macro-Evolution: Chapter 10 of: Evolution: A - Leonid Grinin et al. [3]
- Alternatives of Social Evolution / Ed. by N. Kradin, A. Korotayev, & D. Bondarenko. Vladivostok: FEB RAS, 2000
The State and Social Hierarchy
- Early State and Its Alternatives: * Book: The Early State, Its Alternatives and Analogues. Ed. by Leonid E. Grinin, Robert L. Carneiro et al. 'Uchitel' Publishing House, 2004
- Democracy and the Early State. Leonid Grinin. Social Evolution & History. Volume 3, Number 2 / September 2004
- Cultural Dimensions of Hierarchy and Power in the History of Civilizations: Edited by Leonid E. Grinin and Andrey V. Korotayev Moscow: KRASAND, 2009. - 216 p.
- Book: MACROHISTORY AND GLOBALIZATION. By Leonid Grinin. Volgograd: ‘Uchitel’ Publishing House, 2012.
Cycles
- * Book: The Kondratieff Almanac. KONDRATIEFF WAVES: Dimensions and Prospects at the Dawn of the 21st Century. [4] [5]
Journal
- Social Evolution and History (journal)
Topics / Articles / Chapters
Cycles
- The Grinin Interpretation of the Sixth Kondratieff Wave
Technology
The State and its Forms
- Leonid Grinin on the Evolution of State Forms: on major qualitative stages of the development of the world productive forces. Grinin singles out four principles of production: Hunter-gatherer; Craft-Agrarian; Leonid Grinin connects major technological achievements with the Cybernetic revolution. ; Evolutionary Pathways to Statehood.