Limitations to Economic Environmental Valuation: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 19: Line 19:
these latter economic environmental valuation (EEV)
these latter economic environmental valuation (EEV)
methods that are the subject of this policy brief."
methods that are the subject of this policy brief."
=Summary of the Key Arguments=
1. EEV methods fail to secure ecosystem
sustainability.
2. EEV methods mistakenly assume that money can
be used as a neutral measuring rod of people’s
preferences,
3. EEV methods
are grounded in a misguided
approach to decision making.
4. EEV methods misunderstand, and motivate policies
which fail to respect, the way in which people value
nature.
5. EEV methods may compromise intrinsic motivation
for environmental protection.
6. EEV methods facilitate the troubling expansion of
market norms into
environmental
valuation
and
decision making


[[Category:Ecology]]
[[Category:Ecology]]

Latest revision as of 03:11, 13 February 2014

* Article: The Limitations to Economic Environmental Valuation. BIOMOT Policy brief # 1, October 2013

URL = http://www.biomotivation.eu/docs/BIOMOT%20Policy%20Brief%201%20-%20official%20version.pdf

Description

"The explanation for environmental problems has long been claimed by environmental economists as lying in the fact that environmental goods are not priced in the market, and that therefore the solution to those problems is to bring environmental goods into the market. This can be done, it is argued, by either creating actual markets – such as the EU Emissions Trading System – or by using valuation methods to determine ‘shadow’ prices for environmental goods that are not included in actual markets. These prices can then be entered into cost benefit analyses. It is these latter economic environmental valuation (EEV) methods that are the subject of this policy brief."


Summary of the Key Arguments

1. EEV methods fail to secure ecosystem sustainability.

2. EEV methods mistakenly assume that money can be used as a neutral measuring rod of people’s preferences,

3. EEV methods are grounded in a misguided approach to decision making.

4. EEV methods misunderstand, and motivate policies which fail to respect, the way in which people value nature.

5. EEV methods may compromise intrinsic motivation for environmental protection.

6. EEV methods facilitate the troubling expansion of market norms into environmental valuation and decision making