Dialectic: Difference between revisions
Fish Bubble (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Dialectic''' is a manner and form of rational communication between two or more points of view inside of a discussion. It is contrasted against grammar and rhetoric, one of the three liberal arts or trivium in Western Culture. | '''Dialectic''' is a manner and form of rational communication between two or more points of view inside of a discussion. It is contrasted against grammar and rhetoric, one of the three liberal arts or trivium in Western Culture. | ||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic wikipedia entry on dialectic] | See the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic wikipedia entry on dialectic] | ||
==Description== | ==Description== | ||
Dialectic originates back to ancient Greece, most notably the Socratic Method, which is still used in legal debate to this very day. Hegel updated the understanding of dialectic and spoke of what he called 'The Historical Dialectic", or the exchange of thesis, anti-thesis resolving into synthesis that shapes historical movements. Hegel believed that the historical dialectic would eventually lead humanity to a place of ultimate liberation. | Dialectic originates back to ancient Greece, most notably the Socratic Method, which is still used in legal debate to this very day. Hegel updated the understanding of dialectic and spoke of what he called 'The Historical Dialectic", or the exchange of thesis, anti-thesis resolving into synthesis that shapes historical movements. Hegel believed that the historical dialectic would eventually lead humanity to a place of ultimate liberation. | ||
Revision as of 07:50, 21 July 2006
Dialectic is a manner and form of rational communication between two or more points of view inside of a discussion. It is contrasted against grammar and rhetoric, one of the three liberal arts or trivium in Western Culture.
See the wikipedia entry on dialectic
Description
Dialectic originates back to ancient Greece, most notably the Socratic Method, which is still used in legal debate to this very day. Hegel updated the understanding of dialectic and spoke of what he called 'The Historical Dialectic", or the exchange of thesis, anti-thesis resolving into synthesis that shapes historical movements. Hegel believed that the historical dialectic would eventually lead humanity to a place of ultimate liberation.
In relationship to P2P, dialectic can be appreciated in it's exalted form through online written discussion, allowing large groups to form synthesis and may stimulate co-intelligence. Internet discussion allows the natural tit for tat strategy of dialogue to exalt into a win win in the conflict of idea, allowing many global points of view to transform and align in profound ways. Indeed, the impact of direct peer to peer communications on the historical dialectic may be too overwhelming to currently model, as internet communication has increased this process exponentially in ways that were unfathomable in Hegel's day.