Nondominium: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''= Nondominium – reflects the fact that no country or combination of countries has the power of dominant control over the relevant territory and resources.''' | |||
=Definition= | |||
Chris Cook: | |||
'''the consensual legal framework agreement within which value may be created, shared and exchanged (P2P) on credit terms by reference to a unit of account (note that a unit of account is NOT a currency).''' | |||
=Description= | =Description= | ||
Revision as of 17:43, 16 August 2012
= Nondominium – reflects the fact that no country or combination of countries has the power of dominant control over the relevant territory and resources.
Definition
Chris Cook:
the consensual legal framework agreement within which value may be created, shared and exchanged (P2P) on credit terms by reference to a unit of account (note that a unit of account is NOT a currency).
Description
Chris Cook:
"Many indigenous peoples, such as American Indians and Australian Aborigines, find it impossible to understand how anyone can own land. Whereas, most religious traditions - including Christianity, Islam, and Judaism - were all founded upon a belief that absolute ownership, particularly of land, is God's alone, and that a tribute should be paid accordingly, such as a tithe.
I believe that an apt term to describe this proposal's essentially Gandhian approach to the property relationship is as a Nondominium - and my instinct is that such a framework could revolutionize international economic relations." (http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/MI24Dj01.html)