100 Point Open Source Projects: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* 0 points: Say you are open | |||
* 10 points: Choose an OSI license (BSD, AFL, Apache, MIT, etc.) | |||
*20 points: Define the governance of the code. (Check) | |||
** Does one company hold all of the cards? (No) | |||
** Can others participate? (Yes) | |||
** For code, who participates? (Committers and contributors) | |||
** Can anyone patch? (Yes, with a CLA) | |||
** Can you, and if so how do you become a committer? (Yes, follow instructions for contributing patches and getting involved) | |||
** At the core: How are decisions made (In the Open) | |||
* 30 points: A reference implementation under an open source license (Check) | |||
* 40 points: Where does the IP stand? (Clean, open, with CLAs). Did you donate it to a foundation? (Yes) “ | |||
(http://dojofoundation.org/about/hundredpoint/) | (http://dojofoundation.org/about/hundredpoint/) | ||
Revision as of 20:39, 4 March 2011
Characteristics
“Dion Almaer's Being Open is Hard provides a great starting point for describing how all Dojo Foundation projects are "100-point" open source projects:
- 0 points: Say you are open
- 10 points: Choose an OSI license (BSD, AFL, Apache, MIT, etc.)
- 20 points: Define the governance of the code. (Check)
- Does one company hold all of the cards? (No)
- Can others participate? (Yes)
- For code, who participates? (Committers and contributors)
- Can anyone patch? (Yes, with a CLA)
- Can you, and if so how do you become a committer? (Yes, follow instructions for contributing patches and getting involved)
- At the core: How are decisions made (In the Open)
- 30 points: A reference implementation under an open source license (Check)
- 40 points: Where does the IP stand? (Clean, open, with CLAs). Did you donate it to a foundation? (Yes) “