Mapping the New Commons: Difference between revisions
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
#[[Neighborhood Commons]] | #[[Neighborhood Commons]] | ||
#[[Infrastructure Commons]] | #[[Infrastructure Commons]] | ||
#[[Knowledge Commons]] | |||
Revision as of 21:08, 26 November 2010
* Paper: Hess, Charlotte, Mapping the New Commons (July 1, 2008).
Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1356835
Abstract
"This paper is a guide to the rapidly growing area of research and activity I call 'new commons.' Simply put, new commons (NC) are various types of shared resources that have recently evolved or have been recognized as commons. They are commons without pre-existing rules or clear institutional arrangements. The paper introduces a map that outlines the NC resource sectors and identifies some of the salient questions that this new area of research raises. In addition, it examines the relationship between new commons and traditional common-pool resources and common property regimes.
This overview includes a survey of the physical resources, the user communities, the literature, and some of the major collective action activities. Tacking new commons over several years has demonstrated that this vast arena is inhabited by heterogeneous groups from divergent disciplines, political interests, and geographical regions that are increasingly finding the term 'commons' crucial in addressing issues of social dilemmas, degradation, and sustainability of a wide variety of shared resources. The resource sectors include scientific knowledge, voluntary associations, climate change, community gardens, wikipedias, cultural treasures, plant seeds, and the electromagnetic spectrum. All of these new resource sectors and communities require rigorous study and analysis in order to better grasp the institutional nature of these beasts. This map is designed to serve as an introductory reference guide for future scholarly work."
Charlotte Hess on the purpose of this paper:
"The purpose of this paper is threefold:
1) to identify the various new commons6 sectors and sub-sectors and representative collective-action communities involved in new commons;
2) to survey the ways commoners, practitioners, and scholars discover and then conceptualize the commons. I call the discovery patterns “entrypoints” that can be thought of as catalysts that change one’s conception of a resource as a private, government-owned, or open access resource into a commons. The entrypoints reveal how the notion that a particular resource or group was a commons might have arisen; and
3) to attempt a viable definition of the new commons. It briefly surveys various definitions given by some of the authors of recent literature and attempts to discern connecting threads.
This is not an easy assignment, since new commons are usually not
analyzed in terms of property rights or economic goods as with much of the traditional
commons literature. There is no general usage for the term “commons.” And, indeed,
authors of the new commons take carte blanche in their use of the term. Besides the
commons, what exactly is “new” in “new commons?”
The last part of the paper will discuss some of the challenges of new commons research." (http://ssrn.com/abstract=1356835)
Excerpts
Entrypoints into the New Commons
Charlotte Hess:
"How do people arrive at the commons? What are the triggers that lead to the naming of a resource a commons? What I saw repeatedly in reviewing works on new commons were disparate meanings and uses of “the commons” as a descriptor of a resource, movement, or phenomenon. Yet, they all had a sense of “sharing” and joint ownership. Six common entrypoints are:
(A.) the need to protect a shared resource from enclosure, privatization, or commodification;
(B.) the observation or action of peer- production and mass collaboration primarily in electronic media;
(C.) evidence of new types of tragedies of the commons;
(D.) the desire to build civic education and commons-like thinking; and
(E.) identification of new or evolving types of commons within traditional commons; and
(F.)rediscovery of the commons." (http://ssrn.com/abstract=1356835)
Specific Commons
The text reviews:
Civic Commons
"Peter Levine has written extensively on the civic commons (Levine 2002a&b, 2003, 2007a&b; Gastil and Levine 2005). A very interesting and useful text for business managers was put out by the Institute for the Future in 2005 (Saveri et al.). The authors explore emerging fields of knowledge and practice, looking for ways to think about two key business questions: “How can new insights about the dynamics of cooperation help us identify new and lucrative models for organizing production and wealth creation that leverage win–win dynamics; and How can organizations enhance their creativity and grow potential innovation with cooperation-based strategic models?” The authors draw heavily from the commons and collective action literature of Ostrom and colleagues." (http://ssrn.com/abstract=1356835)
Bibliography:
Levine, Peter. 2001. "Civic Renewal and the Commons of Cyberspace." National Civic Review 90(3):205-212. http://www.ncl.org/publications/ncr/90-3/chapter1.pdf
Levine, Peter. 2002a. “Building the Electronic Commons: A Project of the Democratic Collaborative.” (Report) http://www.democracycollaborative.org/programs/public/BuildingElectronicCommons.pdf
Levine, Peter. 2002b. “Can the Internet Rescue Democracy? Toward an On-Line Commons.” In Democracy’s Moment: Reforming the American Political System for the 21st Century. R. Hayduk and K. Mattson, eds. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Levine, Peter. 2003. “A Movement for the Commons?” Responsive Community 13(4):28-39. http://www.peterlevine.ws/responsivecommunity.pdf
Levine, Peter. 2007a. “Collective Action, Civic Engagement, and the Knowledge Commons.” In Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. C. Hess and E. Ostrom, eds. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Levine, Peter. 2007b. The Future of Democracy: Developing the Next Generation of Citizens. Lebanon, NH: Tufts University Press and University Press of New England.