Common: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Discussion= | |||
More and more the concept of the common seems to become a third term, alongside the private and the collective. | More and more the concept of the common seems to become a third term, alongside the private and the collective. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 23: | ||
[[Category:Policy]] | [[Category:Policy]] | ||
[[Category:Commons]] | |||
Revision as of 08:15, 30 June 2009
Discussion
More and more the concept of the common seems to become a third term, alongside the private and the collective.
The common consists of a series of inalienable rights that are hold by all individuals, rather than collective aspects governed by a separate sovereign body, and different from the individualized/privatized aspects of existence.
The difference is explained in our entry on Common Rights, from an article by Dan Sullivan.
It translates into new forms of Common Property that has it own rules and theory, applying to Common Goods and Common Pool Resources, sometimes governed by specialized Common Good Licenses such as the General Public License for software.
The concept of the common is therefore essential for building a society based on the Common Good, and is the key to understand Peer Production and how it socially reproduces itself through a process of Circulation of the Common
Common proprerty forms for physical goods that can be governed through Commons-based approaches can take the form of Trusts