Open Educational Resources: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
=More Information= | =More Information= | ||
See the video by [[Todd Richmond on Open Educational Resources]] | #[http://oerwiki.iiep-unesco.org/index.php?title=OER_useful_resources OER Wiki] | ||
#See the video by [[Todd Richmond on Open Educational Resources]] | |||
OECD Report: [http://www.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/get-it.asp?REF=9607041E.PDF&TYPE=browse Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources] | #OECD Report: [http://www.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/get-it.asp?REF=9607041E.PDF&TYPE=browse Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources] | ||
#[http://www.olcos.org/cms/upload/docs/olcos_roadmap.pdf Open Educational Practices and Resources: OLCOS Roadmap 2012] | |||
[http://www.olcos.org/cms/upload/docs/olcos_roadmap.pdf Open Educational Practices and Resources: OLCOS Roadmap 2012] | #[http://www.oerderves.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/a-review-of-the-open-educational-resources-oer-movement_final.pdf A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities] (Atkins, Brown, and Hammond, 80 pages) | ||
#Essay: [http://communities.libre.org/philosophy/saylibre Say "Libre" for Knowledge and Learning Resources]. Kim Tucker. | |||
[http://www.oerderves.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/a-review-of-the-open-educational-resources-oer-movement_final.pdf A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities] (Atkins, Brown, and Hammond, 80 pages) | |||
Essay: [http://communities.libre.org/philosophy/saylibre Say "Libre" for Knowledge and Learning Resources]. Kim Tucker. | |||
[[Category:Encyclopedia]] | [[Category:Encyclopedia]] | ||
Revision as of 04:36, 24 December 2007
= The open provision of educational resources, enabled by information and communication technologies, for consultation, use and adaptation by a community of users for noncommercial purposes.
- Unesco 2002 [1]
Definition
Open Educational Resources are defined as "technology-enabled, open provision of educational resources for consultation, use and adaptation by a community of users for non-commercial purposes". They are typically made freely available over the Web or the Internet. Their principal use is by teachers and educational institutions support course development, but they can also be used directly by students. Open Educational Resources include learning objects such as lecture material, references and readings, simulations, experiments and demonstrations, as well as syllabi, curricula and teachers’ guides." (http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/247)
Description
Read: the current state of OER, at http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/247
A Brief History of OER
In 1994 Wayne Hodgins coined the term "learning object" and this term quickly entered the vernacular of educators and instructional designers. One role of learning objects in the history of OER is its popularization of the idea that digital materials can be designed and produced in such a manner as to be reused easily in a variety of pedagogical situations. Along with its emphasis on reuse, the learning object movement spawned several standards efforts aimed at detailing metadata, content exchange, and other standards necessary for users to find and reuse digital educational content (ARIADNE, IMS, IEEE LTSC / LOM, SCORM, &c.).
In 1998 David Wiley coined the term "open content" and while targeted at the educational community (and learning object creators specifically), the term quickly entered the vernacular of internet users. One role of open content in the history of OER is its popularization of the idea that the principles of the open source / free software movements can be productively applied to content, and the creation of the first widely adopted open license for content (the Open Publication License).
In 2001 Larry Lessig and others founded the Creative Commons and released a flexible set of licenses that were both a vast improvement on the Open Publication License’s confusing license option structure and significantly stronger legal documents. One role of Creative Commons in the history of OER is the increase in credibility and confidence their legally superior, much easier to use licenses brought to the open content community.
Also in 2001 MIT announced its OpenCourseWare initiative to publish nearly every university course for free public access for noncommercial use. MIT OpenCourseWare has played many roles in the history of OER, including being an example of commitment at an institutional level, working actively to encourage similar projects, and lending the MIT brand to the movement.
Finally, in 2002 UNESCO held a Forum comprised of some of the many people who "wish[ed] to develop together a universal educational resource available for the whole of humanity". (http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/247)
Examples
Open University (UK) Open Content Initiative
Carnegie Mellon Open Learning Initiative
National Repository of Online Courses
Discussion
Open Access to the means of instruction is critical
David Wiley:
"we have to understand that content is infrastructure to see current “open educational resources” projects and initiatives from the proper perspective. The OpenCourseWares, the Connexions, the GLOBEs, and all the other repositories of open educational resources in the world are critical infrastructure. As such, they are necessary conditions for revolutionizing education. The revolution can not happen without them. However, open content itself is by no means a sufficient condition for the revolution to succeed. So much more is needed! The list above includes only a handful of what needs to be worked on (localization, translation, low-bandwidth delivery, accreditation, degrees, certificates, support, tutors, study group locators).
To say that content, and therefore these projects, are necessary but not sufficient conditions is not to say that content is unimportant. Anything but! Every piece of the system, including content, is critical.
Content is infrastructure. An important beginning step that absolutely must be completed, and there is much more to follow." (http://blog.worldcampus.psu.edu/index.php/2007/10/03/content-is-infrastructure/)
Open Educational Resources should be Free as well
"As mentioned previously, the adjective "open" does not express the essence of this freedom to engage. It is also possible that the term OER, defined in terms of "intellectual property", was more acceptable at the time to those who would allocate funding to the initiatives. OCW and most prominent OER initiatives are institutionally focussed. Would the movement have been as successful to date if OER and OCW had been promoted as "Free Educational Resources" or "Libre CourseWare" etc.? This is similar to the "open source" versus "free software" situation described above.
Times change, awareness of global issues is growing, and it is more important than ever to inspire action towards holistic and well thought out visions of a sustainable future to inform and guide our efforts. For OER and other "open" initiatives, it is time to transform.
Recognise the need for universal participation in the global knowledge society, understand the perspective of development as freedom (Sen, 1999), and respect the freedom of local communities to localise, adapt, mix and share knowledge resources. Quality and utility is context-specific.
The "Open" communities are invited to re-assess their stated goals - for the most part, these are already orientated towards libre knowledge - and consider relabelling resources and titles "Libre" or "Free". At the very least, use these terms when freedom to use, copy, modify, mix and share is the intended meaning." (http://communities.libre.org/philosophy/saylibre)
More Information
- OER Wiki
- See the video by Todd Richmond on Open Educational Resources
- OECD Report: Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources
- Open Educational Practices and Resources: OLCOS Roadmap 2012
- A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities (Atkins, Brown, and Hammond, 80 pages)
- Essay: Say "Libre" for Knowledge and Learning Resources. Kim Tucker.