Thought-Shapers: Difference between revisions
unknown (talk) (Created page with " '''* Article: Thought-Shapers. By Robert Hanna and Otto Paans. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol. 17, no. 1, 2021.''' URL = https://c...") |
unknown (talk) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''* Article: [[Thought-Shapers]]. By Robert Hanna and Otto Paans. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol. 17, no. 1, 2021.''' | '''* Article: [[Thought-Shapers]]. By Robert Hanna and Otto Paans. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol. 17, no. 1, 2021.''' | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
''This is a companion-piece to our recent essay, “This is the Way the World Ends: A Philosophy of Civilization Since 1900, and A Philosophy of the Future,” Cosmos & History16, 2 (2020): 1-53.'' | ''This is a companion-piece to our recent essay, “This is the Way the World Ends: A Philosophy of Civilization Since 1900, and A Philosophy of the Future,” Cosmos & History16, 2 (2020): 1-53.'' | ||
For a more extensive treatment, see: [[Theory of Thought-Shapers]] | |||
Revision as of 08:26, 14 February 2023
* Article: Thought-Shapers. By Robert Hanna and Otto Paans. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol. 17, no. 1, 2021.
URL = https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/923/1560
This is a companion-piece to our recent essay, “This is the Way the World Ends: A Philosophy of Civilization Since 1900, and A Philosophy of the Future,” Cosmos & History16, 2 (2020): 1-53.
For a more extensive treatment, see: Theory of Thought-Shapers
Abstract
" In this essay, we shift our focus from the philosophy of human civilization to the philosophy of human thinking.
More precisely, we apply the categorical distinction between
(i) mechanical (i.e., computable/recursive, entropic, and deterministic or indeterministic) systems and
(ii) organic (i.e., uncomputable/non-recursive, processual, negentropic, purposive, and self-organizing) systems, to fundamental issues in the philosophy of mind and cognition, with general application to the nature of human thinking in the formal and natural sciences, the applied arts and fine arts, morality, and sociopolitics, as well as metaphysics and epistemology.
By “thought-shapers,” we mean mental representations of any or all of the following: allegories, analogies, blueprints, catechisms, diagrams, displays, icons, images, lay-outs, metaphors, mnemonics, models, outlines, parables, pictures, scenarios, schemata, sketches, spreadsheets, stereotypes, symbols, tableaux, and templates.
Correspondingly, we argue that human thinking is really possible only insofar as it’s partially causally determined, formed, and normatively guided by either
(i) mechanical, constrictive thought-shapers in a bad, false, and wrong way, or
(ii) organic, generative thought-shapers in a good, true, and right way."