Death Knell for Open Politics: Difference between revisions
(added brackets and two categories) |
(removed open source everything as category) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[Category:Open Governance]] | [[Category:Open Governance]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:50, 4 October 2015
See the panel discussion, Debating Free and Open, via http://vimeo.com/17401986
Description
Nate Tkacz, Melbourne University, Death Knell for Open Politics:
Openness has become the master category of politics in network cultures. Whereas recent instantiations of the open cannot be understood without reference to 80s software cultures, the idea of openness extends beyond this specific context: Openness has a history. Most famously, it was mobilised by Karl Popper as a critique of totalitarian knowledge and to justify market organisation and the related (neo)liberal disposition. In this presentation I make some critical observations regarding the function of openness both in contemporary network cultures and in the writings of Popper. By placing these distinct but related iterations in dialogue, I hope to point out that there is much more at stake in the battle for openness than its mere realisation. [1]