Accessibility: Difference between revisions
(added three categories) |
(→More Information: removed open source everything as category) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
[[Category:Open Software]] | [[Category:Open Software]] | ||
Revision as of 12:49, 4 October 2015
= considered as form of Openness
Description
West and O’Mahony:
“Transparency meant that the code was publicly available, that most of the software production process was discussed on public mailing lists or discussion boards, and that the software release cycle and goals were also provided on the community website.”
“The second type of openness sponsors considered when designing a sponsored community was the degree of accessibility — the amount of control sponsors would relinquish to the community. An accessible community not only provides visibility, but allows some outsiders to gain access to either the project’s code repository, community planning processes, or strategic decision-making.” (http://www.joelwest.org/Papers/WestOMahony2008-WP.pdf)