Mutual Coordination Economics Working Group: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "'''= an initiative to share insight around non-market, non-state based mutual coordination in production and economics''' =Participants= * Angela Espinosa * [[Lynn Fost...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''= an initiative to share insight around non-market, non-state based mutual coordination in production and economics'''
'''= an initiative to share insight around non-market, non-state based mutual coordination in production and economics'''
Alternative Name: Cybernetic Economics
=Discussion=
==Name of the Group==
'''1. [[David Potocnik]]:'''
"My original intention was to form a study group & redevelopment project on the ashes of the Cybersyn project.
Perhaps the name Cybernetic economics would be more fitting.
In this context, I'm looking fwd to seeing what you mean with "Mutual Coordination Economics" and "an initiative to share insight around non-market, non-state based mutual coordination in production and economics"
As far as this I personally
* agree with the non-market
* would not limit to non-state
* emphasis on distribution guiding production
'''2. Michel Bauwens:'''
I have no objection to changing the name.
My own idea is: what pricing is to the market and planning is to the bureaucratic state, mutual coordination is to economics based on open and shared commons.





Revision as of 03:30, 21 July 2014

= an initiative to share insight around non-market, non-state based mutual coordination in production and economics

Alternative Name: Cybernetic Economics

Discussion

Name of the Group

1. David Potocnik:

"My original intention was to form a study group & redevelopment project on the ashes of the Cybersyn project.

Perhaps the name Cybernetic economics would be more fitting.

In this context, I'm looking fwd to seeing what you mean with "Mutual Coordination Economics" and "an initiative to share insight around non-market, non-state based mutual coordination in production and economics"

As far as this I personally

  • agree with the non-market
  • would not limit to non-state
  • emphasis on distribution guiding production


2. Michel Bauwens:

I have no objection to changing the name.

My own idea is: what pricing is to the market and planning is to the bureaucratic state, mutual coordination is to economics based on open and shared commons.



Participants


Other Researchers

Past Projects


Reference Material