From Intersubjectivity to Interbeing: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
unknown (talk)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:


Evan Thompson, on the enactive theory of consciousness


'''Title: Human Consciousness: from intersubjectivity to interbeing'''
'''Article: Human Consciousness: from intersubjectivity to interbeing.Evan Thompson'''


URL = http://www.philosophy.ucf.edu/pcsfetz1.html
URL = http://www.philosophy.ucf.edu/pcsfetz1.html


Evan Thompson contrasts three approaches to human consciousness. He finds that both the cognitivist and the connectionist approaches rely on a undue separation between a reprentational mind and the world it represents. The enactive approach, pioneered by Varela and others, on the other hand, is based on a structural coupling of the brain, the body, and its environment.
on the enactive theory of consciousness
 
 
=Contextual Quote=


"''Human consciousness is not located in the head, but is immanent in the living body and the interpersonal social world. One’s consciousness of oneself as an embodied individual embedded in the world emerges through empathic cognition of others. Consciousness is not some peculiar qualitative aspect of private mental states, nor a property of the brain inside the skull; it is a relational mode of being of the whole person embedded in the natural environment and the human social world''."
"''Human consciousness is not located in the head, but is immanent in the living body and the interpersonal social world. One’s consciousness of oneself as an embodied individual embedded in the world emerges through empathic cognition of others. Consciousness is not some peculiar qualitative aspect of private mental states, nor a property of the brain inside the skull; it is a relational mode of being of the whole person embedded in the natural environment and the human social world''."
- Evan Thompson [http://www.philosophy.ucf.edu/pcsfetz1.html]
=Description=
Evan Thompson contrasts three approaches to human consciousness. He finds that both the cognitivist and the connectionist approaches rely on a undue separation between a representational mind and the world it represents. The enactive approach, pioneered by Varela and others, on the other hand, is based on a structural coupling of the brain, the body, and its environment.
=Summary=
From the reading notes of Michel Bauwens, 2006:
=More information=


More by Evan Thompson at http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/
More by Evan Thompson at http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/


[[Category:Articles]]
[[Category:Articles]]
[[Category:Relational]]
[[Category:Relational]]
[[Category:Bauwens Reading Notes Project]]

Revision as of 09:30, 4 January 2023


Article: Human Consciousness: from intersubjectivity to interbeing.Evan Thompson

URL = http://www.philosophy.ucf.edu/pcsfetz1.html

on the enactive theory of consciousness


Contextual Quote

"Human consciousness is not located in the head, but is immanent in the living body and the interpersonal social world. One’s consciousness of oneself as an embodied individual embedded in the world emerges through empathic cognition of others. Consciousness is not some peculiar qualitative aspect of private mental states, nor a property of the brain inside the skull; it is a relational mode of being of the whole person embedded in the natural environment and the human social world."

- Evan Thompson [1]


Description

Evan Thompson contrasts three approaches to human consciousness. He finds that both the cognitivist and the connectionist approaches rely on a undue separation between a representational mind and the world it represents. The enactive approach, pioneered by Varela and others, on the other hand, is based on a structural coupling of the brain, the body, and its environment.


Summary

From the reading notes of Michel Bauwens, 2006:


More information

More by Evan Thompson at http://individual.utoronto.ca/evant/