Alternative Law Forum: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
From Bangalore, India: Alternative Law Forum | From Bangalore, [[India]]: Alternative Law Forum | ||
URL = http://www.altlawforum.org/ | URL = http://www.altlawforum.org/ | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
"ALF perceives itself simultaneously as a space that provides | "ALF perceives itself simultaneously as a space that provides | ||
qualitative legal services to marginalized groups, as an autonomous | qualitative legal services to marginalized groups, as an [[autonomous]] | ||
research institution with a strong interdisciplinary approach working | research institution with a strong interdisciplinary approach working | ||
with practitioners from other fields, as a public legal resource using | with practitioners from other fields, as a public legal resource using | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
information, as a centre for generating quality resources that will | information, as a centre for generating quality resources that will | ||
make interventions in legal education and training, and as finally a | make interventions in legal education and training, and as finally a | ||
platform to enable collaborative and creative models of knowledge | platform to enable [[collaborative]] and creative models of [[knowledge | ||
production." | production]]." | ||
In particular, see the essay: Encountering the Sustaining Myths of Copyright, at | In particular, see the essay: Encountering the Sustaining Myths of Copyright, at | ||
Revision as of 01:23, 12 July 2008
From Bangalore, India: Alternative Law Forum
URL = http://www.altlawforum.org/
Description
Sent by Frederick Noronha:
"ALF perceives itself simultaneously as a space that provides qualitative legal services to marginalized groups, as an autonomous research institution with a strong interdisciplinary approach working with practitioners from other fields, as a public legal resource using conventional and unconventional forms of creating access to information, as a centre for generating quality resources that will make interventions in legal education and training, and as finally a platform to enable collaborative and creative models of [[knowledge production]]."
In particular, see the essay: Encountering the Sustaining Myths of Copyright, at http://www.altlawforum.org/PUBLICATIONS/document.2004-12-18.5142324852