Co-Production: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Definition= | =Definition= | ||
| Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
To be successful, co-production needs to retain its informal approach. Local intermediary agencies – in particular properly resourced time banks – may be best placed to achieve this." | To be successful, co-production needs to retain its informal approach. Local intermediary agencies – in particular properly resourced time banks – may be best placed to achieve this." | ||
(http://www.valueforpeople.co.uk/co_production) | (http://www.valueforpeople.co.uk/co_production) | ||
=More Information= | |||
#[http://www.jrf.org.uk/Knowledge/findings/socialpolicy/0356.asp Co-production by people outside paid employment], Joseph Rowntree Foundation. | |||
#The [http://www.timebanks.org/documents/Co-ProductionPrinciple.pdf Co-Production Principle]. By David Boyle of Timebanks | |||
Revision as of 10:56, 2 October 2007
Definition
"Co-Production is a term used to redefine the relationship between service professionals and the beneficiaries of services as one of mutuality and reciprocity rather than one of dependency. This process may or may not involve the use of a community currency mechanism such as time banking." (http://www.valueforpeople.co.uk/co_production)
Description
"The Joseph Rowntree Foundation with the New Economics Foundation and Wales Institute for Community Currencies researched co-production amongst people outside paid work (see articles) and concluded:
There is an emerging 'co-production' sector – both inside and outside public services – where service users are regarded as assets, involved in mutual support and the delivery of services.
Co-production, where it has been happening successfully, has generally been outside nationally funded services that are supposed to achieve this, and usually despite – rather than because of – administrative systems inside public services.
A key characteristic of public and voluntary institutions that successfully involve their users, as well as their families and neighbours, is an understanding that people who have previously been treated as collective burdens on an overstretched system are untapped potential assets. Co-production projects can help participants to extend their social networks and friendships and the range of opportunities open to them.
Some kind of reciprocal relationship between users and organisations can broaden the social reach of the projects: 'time banks' are an effective – though not the only – way of valuing their contribution.
Co-production project co-ordinators can be isolated and over-stretched, even those based inside public services: developing staff capacity is as important as developing the capacity of people outside paid work.
The researchers conclude that:
Organisations that want to develop co-productive ways of working need to focus not just on clients' problems, but on their abilities.
The benefits system needs to be able to provide incentives for those outside paid work to get more involved in their neighbourhoods without endangering their basic income.
To be successful, co-production needs to retain its informal approach. Local intermediary agencies – in particular properly resourced time banks – may be best placed to achieve this." (http://www.valueforpeople.co.uk/co_production)
More Information
- Co-production by people outside paid employment, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
- The Co-Production Principle. By David Boyle of Timebanks