Vibe Coding: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "=Discussion= Benjamin Life: "The idea of non-programmers suddenly building functional software seemed too good to be true—surely it would lead to rabbit holes of complexity far beyond our abilities. But through pressure from thoughtful friends, I was nudged toward discoveries that have reshaped my understanding of what's possible. Over the past few months, I've watched the vibe coding movement gain momentum, powered by AI-assisted development tools like Cursor that...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
(https://omniharmonic.substack.com/p/civic-vibe-coding-localism) | (https://omniharmonic.substack.com/p/civic-vibe-coding-localism) | ||
=Characteristics= | |||
Benjamin Life: | |||
"When we examine vibe coding through the lens of [[Participatory Design]] principles, its transformative potential becomes clear. Rather than waiting for venture-backed companies to build tools that eventually extract rent from users, communities can now create bespoke software that serves their actual needs. This aligns perfectly with what we might call a "protocol pattern language" for technology development—a methodology that encourages modular, open-source creation where individual components can be easily adapted for different local contexts. | |||
The beauty of this approach lies in its emphasis on composability and interoperability. Just as biological systems develop through the interaction of modular components that can be recombined in endless ways, community-centered software development thrives when tools are built as interoperable modules rather than monolithic platforms. Each community's unique implementation contributes to a growing commons of knowledge and code that others can adapt and build upon. | |||
This represents a fundamental shift from extractive to generative technology design. Instead of building closed systems designed to capture and monetize user data, communities can create open systems that generate value through use and sharing. The software becomes a public good rather than a private asset, strengthening the commons rather than depleting it." | |||
(https://omniharmonic.substack.com/p/civic-vibe-coding-localism) | |||
[[Category:Design]] | |||
[[Category:Encyclopedia]] | [[Category:Encyclopedia]] | ||
[[Category:P2P_Infrastructure]] | [[Category:P2P_Infrastructure]] | ||
[[Category:Technology]] | [[Category:Technology]] | ||
Revision as of 07:35, 21 June 2025
Discussion
Benjamin Life:
"The idea of non-programmers suddenly building functional software seemed too good to be true—surely it would lead to rabbit holes of complexity far beyond our abilities. But through pressure from thoughtful friends, I was nudged toward discoveries that have reshaped my understanding of what's possible.
Over the past few months, I've watched the vibe coding movement gain momentum, powered by AI-assisted development tools like Cursor that promise to make software creation accessible to anyone with a clear vision and the patience to iterate. Despite my initial reservations, I found myself drawn into experimentation, beginning with simple projects and gradually building confidence in creating genuinely useful applications.
What started as curiosity evolved into something much more significant: a recognition that vibe coding represents a fundamental shift in who gets to build software and, more importantly, what kinds of problems get prioritized for technological solutions."
(https://omniharmonic.substack.com/p/civic-vibe-coding-localism)
Characteristics
Benjamin Life:
"When we examine vibe coding through the lens of Participatory Design principles, its transformative potential becomes clear. Rather than waiting for venture-backed companies to build tools that eventually extract rent from users, communities can now create bespoke software that serves their actual needs. This aligns perfectly with what we might call a "protocol pattern language" for technology development—a methodology that encourages modular, open-source creation where individual components can be easily adapted for different local contexts.
The beauty of this approach lies in its emphasis on composability and interoperability. Just as biological systems develop through the interaction of modular components that can be recombined in endless ways, community-centered software development thrives when tools are built as interoperable modules rather than monolithic platforms. Each community's unique implementation contributes to a growing commons of knowledge and code that others can adapt and build upon.
This represents a fundamental shift from extractive to generative technology design. Instead of building closed systems designed to capture and monetize user data, communities can create open systems that generate value through use and sharing. The software becomes a public good rather than a private asset, strengthening the commons rather than depleting it."
(https://omniharmonic.substack.com/p/civic-vibe-coding-localism)