Civilization of the Goddess: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
unknown (talk)
(Created page with " '''* Book: The Civilization of the Goddess. By Marija Gimbutas.''' URL = =Description= "In Gimbutas’ last book The Civilization of the Goddess, which synthesizes the wor...")
 
unknown (talk)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''* Book: The Civilization of the Goddess. By Marija Gimbutas.'''
'''* Book: The Civilization of the Goddess. By Marija Gimbutas.'''


Line 11: Line 10:


(https://www.opusarchives.org/marija-gimbutas-collection/)
(https://www.opusarchives.org/marija-gimbutas-collection/)
=Discussion=
Charlene Spretnak:
"The Civilization of Neolithic “Old Europe”             
In  1956,  as  a  Research  Fellow  at  the  Peabody Museum  at  Harvard  University,  Marija Gimbutas  published  The  Prehistory  of  Eastern Europe,  the  very  first  monograph  to  present  a comprehensive  evaluation  of  the  Mesolithic, Neolithic,  and  Copper  Age  cultures  in  Russia and the  Baltic area.  Until this  volume appeared, the  information  available  to  Western  scholars about  the  prehistory  of  Eastern  Europe  was fragmentary  due  to  linguistic  and  political barriers.6    After  thirteen  years  at  Harvard, Marija  Gimbutas  accepted  a full  professorship in  European  Archaeology  at  UCLA  in  1963  and  produced,  among  other  works,  studies  of  the  prehistoric  Balts  and  Slavs,  and  the comprehensive Bronze Age Cultures in  Central and Eastern Europe in  1965, which established her  world-wide  reputation  as  an  expert  on  the European Bronze Age.      Gimbutas  recognized  that  the  Neolithic and  Copper  Age  settlements  of  southeastern Europe  were  not  primitive  versions  of  later Bronze  Age  cultures.  Instead,  these  earlier societies  were  radically  different  in  numerous aspects from what  came later in terms  of burial patterns (roughly egalitarian between males and females),  the  use  of  a  sophisticated  symbol system  (evidence  of  a  systematic  use  of  linear signs  for  the  communication  of  ideas), widespread evidence of domestic rituals (with a vast  outpouring  of  elegant  ritual ceramics), the continual  creation  and use  of  anthropomorphic and  zoomorphic  figurines  (the  vast  majority being female), and  the  absence of weapons  and organized warfare. Because  of the sophisticated level  of  cultural  development; the  long-lasting, stable  societies;  their  commonalities  regarding an  egalitarian  social  structure;  the  well-built  houses and community design; the refinement of technologies  and  material  culture;  evidence of  the  development  of  a  script;  and  inter-connections  through  long-distance  trade, Gimbutas  determined  that  the  non-Indo-European  cultures  of  southeastern  and  eastern Europe  during  the  Neolithic  era  constituted  a civilization, which she called “Old Europe.”  '''She  produced  the  first  overview  of  this civilization  in  1991,  The  Civilization  of  the Goddess''', in which she drew  from her extensive knowledge  of  past  and  present  excavation reports. These were available to her because she read thirteen languages and traveled extensively as  an  exchange  scholar  cultivating  professional relationships  throughout  the  region.  (Most  of these site reports are still not translated, so many of her Anglo-American  detractors are unable  to read them.) She  herself was the  project director of  five  major  excavations  of  Neolithic  sites  in southeastern Europe."
(https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344333178_Anatomy_of_a_Backlash_Concerning_the_Work_of_Marija_Gimbutas)
[[Category:Civilizational Analysis]]
[[Category:Books]]
[[Category:Spirituality]]
[[Category:Gender]]


[[Category:Civilizational Analysis]]
[[Category:Civilizational Analysis]]

Revision as of 06:12, 18 September 2021

* Book: The Civilization of the Goddess. By Marija Gimbutas.

URL =

Description

"In Gimbutas’ last book The Civilization of the Goddess, which synthesizes the work and theses of her previous books (Goddesses and Gods of Old Europe 1974/1982 and The Language of the Goddess 1989/1991), she wrote, “The primordial deity for our Paleolithic and Neolithic ancestors was female, reflecting the sovereignty of motherhood. In fact, there are no images that have been found of a Father God throughout the prehistoric record. Paleolithic and Neolithic symbols and images cluster around a self-generating Goddess and her basic functions as Giver-of-Life, Wielder-of-Death, and as Regeneratrix.” Further in Civilization of the Goddess Gimbutas outlines the symbolic understanding Old European societies had of the universe and the divine. She wrote, “The multiple categories, functions, and symbols used by prehistoric peoples to express the Great Mystery are all aspects of the unbroken unity of one deity, a Goddess who is ultimately Nature herself.” For a complete list of her publications see the Marija Gimbutas bibliography.

Her discoveries took on great symbolic importance for feminists across varied disciplines who found, in her vision of a peaceful, egalitarian, nature-revering society, a sense of hope for the future based on this foundation in the distant past. Unintended to her, Marija Gimbutas’ impact was so great that it reached beyond the scholarly community and helped fuel the women’s movement in society at large. Though scholars on methodological and ideological grounds have challenged her work, this very work fueled the initial tangible, scientific, and material support for the hypotheses that cultures existed wherein patriarchy did not rule, war and violence was not assumed as a cultural norm, and that there were, in fact, egalitarian social structures. In honor of her contribution to the mutual enrichment of cultures for universal understanding and peace, UNESCO designated Gimbutas among its milestone anniversary commemorations for 2021 in observance of her centenary year."

(https://www.opusarchives.org/marija-gimbutas-collection/)


Discussion

Charlene Spretnak:

"The Civilization of Neolithic “Old Europe”

In 1956, as a Research Fellow at the Peabody Museum at Harvard University, Marija Gimbutas published The Prehistory of Eastern Europe, the very first monograph to present a comprehensive evaluation of the Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Copper Age cultures in Russia and the Baltic area. Until this volume appeared, the information available to Western scholars about the prehistory of Eastern Europe was fragmentary due to linguistic and political barriers.6 After thirteen years at Harvard, Marija Gimbutas accepted a full professorship in European Archaeology at UCLA in 1963 and produced, among other works, studies of the prehistoric Balts and Slavs, and the comprehensive Bronze Age Cultures in Central and Eastern Europe in 1965, which established her world-wide reputation as an expert on the European Bronze Age. Gimbutas recognized that the Neolithic and Copper Age settlements of southeastern Europe were not primitive versions of later Bronze Age cultures. Instead, these earlier societies were radically different in numerous aspects from what came later in terms of burial patterns (roughly egalitarian between males and females), the use of a sophisticated symbol system (evidence of a systematic use of linear signs for the communication of ideas), widespread evidence of domestic rituals (with a vast outpouring of elegant ritual ceramics), the continual creation and use of anthropomorphic and zoomorphic figurines (the vast majority being female), and the absence of weapons and organized warfare. Because of the sophisticated level of cultural development; the long-lasting, stable societies; their commonalities regarding an egalitarian social structure; the well-built houses and community design; the refinement of technologies and material culture; evidence of the development of a script; and inter-connections through long-distance trade, Gimbutas determined that the non-Indo-European cultures of southeastern and eastern Europe during the Neolithic era constituted a civilization, which she called “Old Europe.” She produced the first overview of this civilization in 1991, The Civilization of the Goddess, in which she drew from her extensive knowledge of past and present excavation reports. These were available to her because she read thirteen languages and traveled extensively as an exchange scholar cultivating professional relationships throughout the region. (Most of these site reports are still not translated, so many of her Anglo-American detractors are unable to read them.) She herself was the project director of five major excavations of Neolithic sites in southeastern Europe."

(https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344333178_Anatomy_of_a_Backlash_Concerning_the_Work_of_Marija_Gimbutas)