MultiCapital Accounting: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " = URL = =Description= Mark W. McElroy: "Arguably the most pervasive principle found in the 100+ year old literature on sustainability – That the performance of a soci...")
 
unknown (talk)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''= "the performance of a society or organization is best understood in terms of what its impacts on vital capitals are, and with specific reference to their limits".''' [http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf]


=
URL = http://www.multicapitalscorecard.com


URL =
== Contextual Citation ==


"Performance instead is assessed relative to what an organization’s impacts on Vital Capitals must be in order to be sustainable – socially, economically environmentally – with the units of measurement being determined by each capital."
(http://www.multicapitalscorecard.com/MultiCapital_Scorecard_Intro.pdf)


=Description=
== Description ==


Mark W. McElroy:
Mark W. McElroy:
Line 11: Line 14:
"Arguably the most pervasive principle found in the
"Arguably the most pervasive principle found in the
100+ year old literature on sustainability
100+ year old literature on sustainability
 
* That the performance of a society or organization is best understood in terms of what its impacts on vital capitals are, and with specific reference to their limits
That the performance of a society or organization is best
* Vital capitals: natural, human, social, constructed, intellectual and economic "
understood in terms of what its impacts on vital capitals
are, and with specific reference to their limits
 
Vital capitals: natural, human, social, constructed,
intellectual and economic "
 
(http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)
(http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)


=Characteristics=
== Characteristics ==
 
==MCA now also standards-based==
 
• [[International Integrated Reporting Council]] (IIRC)
 
“Integrated thinking is the active consideration by an organization
of the relationships between its various operating and functional
units and the capitals that the organization uses or affects.”
(http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)


===MCA now also standards-based===


[[Sustainability Accounting Standards Board]] (SASB)
* [[International Integrated Reporting Council]] (IIRC)
: “Integrated thinking is the active consideration by an organization of the relationships between its various operating and functional units and the capitals that the organization uses or affects.” (http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)
* [[Sustainability Accounting Standards Board]] (SASB)
: “Material sustainability issues arise in industries that rely on common capitals as a source of value creation, beyond financial or manufactured capital … Common capitals, as used in this Framework, include natural capital … and human capital.” (http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)


“Material sustainability issues arise in industries that rely on
* [[Global Initiative for Sustainability Ratings]] (GISR)
common capitals as a source of value creation, beyond financial
: “Leading reporting initiatives such as IIRC and SASB include references to multiple, or ‘vital,’ capitals. GISR embraces the multiple capitals framework as well.” (http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)
or manufactured capital … Common capitals, as used in this
Framework, include natural capital … and human capital.”
(http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)


 
== Typology ==
• [[Global Initiative for Sustainability Ratings]] (GISR)
 
“Leading reporting initiatives such as IIRC and SASB include
references to multiple, or ‘vital,’ capitals. GISR embraces the
multiple capitals framework as well.”
(http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)
 
 
=Typology=


"There are arguably two schools of thought or broad
"There are arguably two schools of thought or broad
approaches as to how MCA should be done:
approaches as to how MCA should be done:


==1. Market Value (MV)==
===1. Market Value (MV)===


MV school is about measuring and monetizing
* MV school is about measuring and monetizing intangibles and externalities as a basis for explaining market caps and the ability to create $ value
intangibles and externalities as a basis for explaining
* Market Value School
market caps and the ability to create $ value
** First, this is arguably the IIRC’s school of thought because it stresses measurement, management and reporting of capital impacts primarily for the benefit of shareholders
** Prominent illustrations of this approach include the EP&L method (pioneered at Puma); the TIMM method (proprietary PwC tool); and Ernst & Young’s approach to Integrated Reporting
** Forthcoming Natural Capital Protocol may also fit in here


• Market Value School
===2. Triple Bottom Line (TBL)===
 
– First, this is arguably the IIRC’s school of thought because
it stresses measurement, management and reporting of
capital impacts primarily for the benefit of shareholders
 
– Prominent illustrations of this approach include the EP&L
method (pioneered at Puma); the TIMM method
(proprietary PwC tool); and Ernst & Young’s approach to
Integrated Reporting
 
– Forthcoming Natural Capital Protocol may also fit in here
 
 
 
 
 
 
==2. Triple Bottom Line (TBL)==
 
• TBL school, by contrast, is about assessing
impacts on vital capitals as a basis for determining
the overall performance of organizations
 
• Triple Bottom Line School
– So far only one method extant: the MultiCapital Scorecard
• A capital-, context-based and open-source TBL system
• Early users include Ben & Jerry’s, New Chapter and Cabot "


* TBL school, by contrast, is about assessing impacts on vital capitals as a basis for determining the overall performance of organizations
* Triple Bottom Line School
** So far only one method extant: the MultiCapital Scorecard
* A capital-, context-based and open-source TBL system
* Early users include Ben & Jerry’s, New Chapter and Cabot "
(http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)
(http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)


=More information=
== More information ==
 
* [[Multicapitalism]]
* the [[MultiCapital Scorecard]]
* the [[MultiCapital Scorecard]]


[[Category:P2P Accounting]]
[[Category:P2P Accounting]]
[[Category:Thermodynamic Efficiencies]]
[[Category:Thermodynamic Efficiencies]]
[[Category:Sustainable Manufacturing]]
[[Category:Sustainable Manufacturing]]
[[Category:Ecology]]
[[Category:Ecology]]

Latest revision as of 18:39, 2 March 2021

= "the performance of a society or organization is best understood in terms of what its impacts on vital capitals are, and with specific reference to their limits". [1]

URL = http://www.multicapitalscorecard.com

Contextual Citation

"Performance instead is assessed relative to what an organization’s impacts on Vital Capitals must be in order to be sustainable – socially, economically environmentally – with the units of measurement being determined by each capital." (http://www.multicapitalscorecard.com/MultiCapital_Scorecard_Intro.pdf)

Description

Mark W. McElroy:

"Arguably the most pervasive principle found in the 100+ year old literature on sustainability

  • That the performance of a society or organization is best understood in terms of what its impacts on vital capitals are, and with specific reference to their limits
  • Vital capitals: natural, human, social, constructed, intellectual and economic "

(http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)

Characteristics

MCA now also standards-based

“Integrated thinking is the active consideration by an organization of the relationships between its various operating and functional units and the capitals that the organization uses or affects.” (http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)
“Material sustainability issues arise in industries that rely on common capitals as a source of value creation, beyond financial or manufactured capital … Common capitals, as used in this Framework, include natural capital … and human capital.” (http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)
“Leading reporting initiatives such as IIRC and SASB include references to multiple, or ‘vital,’ capitals. GISR embraces the multiple capitals framework as well.” (http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)

Typology

"There are arguably two schools of thought or broad approaches as to how MCA should be done:

1. Market Value (MV)

  • MV school is about measuring and monetizing intangibles and externalities as a basis for explaining market caps and the ability to create $ value
  • Market Value School
    • First, this is arguably the IIRC’s school of thought because it stresses measurement, management and reporting of capital impacts primarily for the benefit of shareholders
    • Prominent illustrations of this approach include the EP&L method (pioneered at Puma); the TIMM method (proprietary PwC tool); and Ernst & Young’s approach to Integrated Reporting
    • Forthcoming Natural Capital Protocol may also fit in here

2. Triple Bottom Line (TBL)

  • TBL school, by contrast, is about assessing impacts on vital capitals as a basis for determining the overall performance of organizations
  • Triple Bottom Line School
    • So far only one method extant: the MultiCapital Scorecard
  • A capital-, context-based and open-source TBL system
  • Early users include Ben & Jerry’s, New Chapter and Cabot "

(http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Multiple_Capital_Accounting.pdf)

More information