Logic Trees for Inclusive Discourse: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''* Article: Logic trees for inclusive discourse. A research agenda proposal / request. By Norbert Bollow.''' | '''* Article: Logic trees for inclusive discourse. A research agenda proposal / request. By Norbert Bollow.''' | ||
URL = | URL = http://itforchange.net/inclusionroundtable2014/file/view/356/logic-trees-for-inclusive-discourse | ||
Discussion paper for the Round table: “Inclusion in the network society - mapping development | Discussion paper for the Round table: “Inclusion in the network society - mapping development | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
discuss innovative ideas. The application of these methods to Internet governance and | discuss innovative ideas. The application of these methods to Internet governance and | ||
sustainable development objectives should be tried and researched." | sustainable development objectives should be tried and researched." | ||
=More Information= | |||
* connect with author Norbert Bollow at <nb@bollow.ch> | |||
Latest revision as of 13:16, 1 October 2014
* Article: Logic trees for inclusive discourse. A research agenda proposal / request. By Norbert Bollow.
URL = http://itforchange.net/inclusionroundtable2014/file/view/356/logic-trees-for-inclusive-discourse
Discussion paper for the Round table: “Inclusion in the network society - mapping development alternatives, forging research agendas ”, Bangaluru, 29th September – 1st October 2014.
Abstract
"Making political decision-making truly inclusive is always challenging. Diversity of concerns and perspectives to be considered is a significant driver of complexity. How much inclusiveness can be achieved is limited by how much diversity can be integrated without losing the ability to organize constructive discourses that lead to adequate decisions, and that achieve this within a reasonable timeframe. I propose that “logic tree” methods of the so-called “Theory of Constraints” are highly promising as a means of managing this complexity in a logically and socially sound and inclusive manner. Mapping concerns by such logic trees allows to identify power structures (which turn up as root causes for concerns), conflicts, and to discover and discuss innovative ideas. The application of these methods to Internet governance and sustainable development objectives should be tried and researched."
More Information
- connect with author Norbert Bollow at <nb@bollow.ch>