Classical Social Movements: Difference between revisions
unknown (talk) (Created page with " =Description= Endnotes: "The classical social movement, as defined by Carl Schmitt, is the mediation between the unorganised people and the state.30 Such a movement seeks t...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Description= | =Description= | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
see: [[Non-Movements]] | see: [[Non-Movements]] | ||
[[Category:Politics]] | |||
[[Category:Civil_Society]] | |||
[[Category:Movements]] | [[Category:Movements]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:P2P_Theory]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:21, 21 October 2023
Description
Endnotes:
"The classical social movement, as defined by Carl Schmitt, is the mediation between the unorganised people and the state.30 Such a movement seeks to organize or mobilize “the people” as an administrative and political category, one that must overcome the identities that differentiate a given nation, often by violently repressing the interests or even existence of specific groups. In contrast, the non-movements express the antagonistic dimension of identity politics in the sense that they cannot constitute a people, and seldom even articulate clear political or positive demands. Or else they produce an endless stream of partial and sometimes contradictory demands — thereby resembling a hydra whose many calls are almost impossible to fulfill, yet whose lifespan can be short and violent."
(https://endnotes.org.uk/posts/endnotes-onward-barbarians)
More information
see: Non-Movements