Beyond Information Abundance: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
unknown (talk) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Essay: 21st-Century Political Economies: Beyond Information Abundance. by Roberto Verzola''' | '''Essay: 21st-Century Political Economies: Beyond Information Abundance. by Roberto Verzola''' | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
"As a result of the relatively low cost of digital reproduction, a global transformation is occurring in the nature of products and processes and in types of goods and services. Arising from information abundance, this global transformation is making the phenomenon of abundance a major field of study, not only for economists but also for other social scientists and physical scientists as well. This essay proposes an economic definition of abundance and a typology of sources of abundance. It argues that real economic abundance can come about only when the demand for a good is finite and the plentiful supply makes the abundant good affordable enough to all members of society. It lists an abundance-nurturing ethic as a major goal of abundance management, and encourages economists to make abundance together with scarcity their conceptual point of departure. Finally it links the phenomenon of abundance to the concept of the commons." | "As a result of the relatively low cost of digital reproduction, a global transformation is occurring in the nature of products and processes and in types of goods and services. Arising from information abundance, this global transformation is making the phenomenon of abundance a major field of study, not only for economists but also for other social scientists and physical scientists as well. This essay proposes an economic definition of abundance and a typology of sources of abundance. It argues that real economic abundance can come about only when the demand for a good is finite and the plentiful supply makes the abundant good affordable enough to all members of society. It lists an abundance-nurturing ethic as a major goal of abundance management, and encourages economists to make abundance together with scarcity their conceptual point of departure. Finally it links the phenomenon of abundance to the concept of the commons." | ||
(http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/011/011-full.pdf) | (http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/011/011-full.pdf) | ||
=Excerpts= | |||
[[Roberto Verzola on the Demand Side of Abundance]] (the 3 SAT’s): | |||
"The following concepts will help show that needs and wants can remain within finite bounds: | |||
* Satiation: Many economists still cling to the hedonist principle that „more is always preferred to less. But some acknowledge, at least in theory, that a satiation level exists for some, if not most, goods. Varian, in particular, says that most goods have a satiation point and that „you can have too much of nearly anything,” which contradicts the „unlimited wants” assertion in most definitions of economics | |||
* Saturation: Beyond the saturation point, one's body either will become incapable or will involuntarily reject additional servings of food and drinks. One can only wear so many clothes, or shoes. One can listen to only so many CDs or watch only so many videos. | |||
* Satisficing: Even before we reach our satiation or saturation levels, we may already reach our satisficed level, in which the quantity we have of a particular good or bundle of goods already suffices to satisfy, and beyond which we would only weakly prefer more.13 In contrast to satiation, which results in a strictly lower preference beyond the bliss point or satiation level, points beyond the satisficing level are either equally preferred or only so slightly or weakly preferred that it does not make a difference. | |||
(http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/011/011-full.pdf) | |||
Source: Verzola, Roberto. 2009. “21st-Century Political Economies: Beyond Information Abundance”. The International Review of Information Ethics 11 (October). | |||
| Line 16: | Line 33: | ||
#Issue 11 of IRIE: [[Ethics of Waste in the Information Society]] | #Issue 11 of IRIE: [[Ethics of Waste in the Information Society]] | ||
#Another article on the topic of [[Abundance]]: Network Ecologies: [[Geophilosophy between Conflict and Cartographies of Abundance]]. by Soenke Zehle | #Another article on the topic of [[Abundance]]: Network Ecologies: [[Geophilosophy between Conflict and Cartographies of Abundance]]. by Soenke Zehle | ||
[[Category:Articles]] | [[Category:Articles]] | ||
[[Category:Business]] | [[Category:Business]] | ||
[[Category:Commons Economics]] | [[Category:Commons Economics]] | ||
Revision as of 06:01, 14 August 2020
Essay: 21st-Century Political Economies: Beyond Information Abundance. by Roberto Verzola
URL = http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/011/011-full.pdf
Abstract
"As a result of the relatively low cost of digital reproduction, a global transformation is occurring in the nature of products and processes and in types of goods and services. Arising from information abundance, this global transformation is making the phenomenon of abundance a major field of study, not only for economists but also for other social scientists and physical scientists as well. This essay proposes an economic definition of abundance and a typology of sources of abundance. It argues that real economic abundance can come about only when the demand for a good is finite and the plentiful supply makes the abundant good affordable enough to all members of society. It lists an abundance-nurturing ethic as a major goal of abundance management, and encourages economists to make abundance together with scarcity their conceptual point of departure. Finally it links the phenomenon of abundance to the concept of the commons." (http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/011/011-full.pdf)
Excerpts
Roberto Verzola on the Demand Side of Abundance (the 3 SAT’s):
"The following concepts will help show that needs and wants can remain within finite bounds:
- Satiation: Many economists still cling to the hedonist principle that „more is always preferred to less. But some acknowledge, at least in theory, that a satiation level exists for some, if not most, goods. Varian, in particular, says that most goods have a satiation point and that „you can have too much of nearly anything,” which contradicts the „unlimited wants” assertion in most definitions of economics
- Saturation: Beyond the saturation point, one's body either will become incapable or will involuntarily reject additional servings of food and drinks. One can only wear so many clothes, or shoes. One can listen to only so many CDs or watch only so many videos.
- Satisficing: Even before we reach our satiation or saturation levels, we may already reach our satisficed level, in which the quantity we have of a particular good or bundle of goods already suffices to satisfy, and beyond which we would only weakly prefer more.13 In contrast to satiation, which results in a strictly lower preference beyond the bliss point or satiation level, points beyond the satisficing level are either equally preferred or only so slightly or weakly preferred that it does not make a difference.
(http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/011/011-full.pdf)
Source: Verzola, Roberto. 2009. “21st-Century Political Economies: Beyond Information Abundance”. The International Review of Information Ethics 11 (October).
Source
- Issue 11 of IRIE: Ethics of Waste in the Information Society
- Another article on the topic of Abundance: Network Ecologies: Geophilosophy between Conflict and Cartographies of Abundance. by Soenke Zehle