Cooperation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 12:40, 10 May 2007
See how the concept of cooperation possible differs from Collaboration.
Robert Axelrod on the 3 Necessary Conditions for Cooperation
Summary by Howard Rheingold of: http://bokardo.com/archives/3-necessary-conditions-for-cooperation/
In The Evolution of Cooperation, written in 1984!, Robert Axelrod suggests there are three necessary conditions for people to cooperate with each other.
1. A likelihood of meeting in the future
If people don’t think they’ll meet again in the future, there are no repercussions for not cooperating. Threats of not cooperating are of no use. People will act selfish if there is no future to the relationship. Therefore, the knowledge of future meetings changes our behavior because we feel some level of impending accountability for our actions.
2. An ability to identify each other
Identity is really important for cooperation because it allows us to know who we’re dealing with. If people can’t identify who they’re dealing with, then they can’t hold that person accountable. This doesn’t mean that we have to know everything about the person, like their address and where they live, it means that they are identified as a person to the system they’re in and the people they’re dealing with.
3. A record of past behavior
We have learned to assume that the best way to judge future
behavior is by looking at past behavior. Thus having a positive
record of behavior leads to cooperation. eBay’s seller ratings are a
great example of this in action. Sellers accumulate status over time
as they do business on the site. Sellers who have a rich transaction
history with a high percentage of positive transactions are much more
likely to be successful than those with no history.