Planetary International Relations
Discussion
By Jonathan Blake and Nils Gilman:
"If the primary threats and challenges are no longer solely interstate wars or economic competition but systemic risks emanating from the destabilization of the Earth system, then the woeful inadequacy of IR’s traditional tool kit becomes apparent. Climate change, for instance, is not a “foreign policy problem” in the conventional sense; it is a condition that reshapes the entire operating environment of all states and actors.7 It respects no borders, and its impacts are distributed unevenly but inevitably across the globe, often in ways that exacerbate existing inequalities.
A planetary IR must move beyond the state-centric obsession. While states remain powerful actors, they are clearly insufficient, individually and collectively, to manage planetary systems. The Westphalian model of absolute sovereignty, where each state holds ultimate authority within its territory, appears increasingly anachronistic when faced with transboundary atmospheric flows or collapsing global fisheries.8 Planetary challenges demand forms of governance, cooperation, and collective action that transcend the nation-state framework. This might involve empowering transnational networks, rethinking international institutions, or developing novel legal and political frameworks grounded in Earth system realities rather than purely inter-human agreements.9
Furthermore, the concept of “security” itself requires radical rethinking. National security, traditionally defined in military terms, offers little protection against rising sea levels or cascading ecological collapse. Planetary security necessitates a focus on Earth system resilience, sustainable resource management, and the mitigation of anthropogenic impacts (Dalby 2009; Homer-Dixon 1999). This shifts the focus from zero-sum competition between states to the potential for collective action aimed at preserving the habitability of the planet—a truly shared interest, however difficult it may be to operationalize politically.
The planetary perspective also forces a confrontation with deep-seated inequalities. The historical responsibility for planetary destabilization lies disproportionately with the industrialized nations of the Global North, while the most severe impacts are often felt by vulnerable populations in the Global South.10 Any viable planetary politics must therefore grapple with questions of climate justice, ecological debt, and the equitable sharing of burdens and responsibilities (Shue 1999; Bond 2012; Mbembe 2022). This is not merely an ethical imperative but a practical necessity for building the broad-based cooperation required for effective action."
More information
Bibliography:
Bond, Patrick. 2012. Politics of Climate Justice: Paralysis Above, Movement Below. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.
Bunker, Stephen G. 1985. Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Unequal Exchange, and the Failure of the Modern State. University of Illinois Press.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35 (2): 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640. ———. 2012. “Postcolonial Studies and the Challenge of Climate Change.” New Literary History 43 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2012.0007.
Clark, Nigel, and Kathryn Yusoff. 2017. “Geosocial Formations and the Anthropocene.” Theory, Culture & Society 34 (2–3): 3–23.
Crosby, Alfred W. 1972. The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492. Greenwood Press.
Dalby, Simon. 2009. Security and Environmental Change. Polity Press.
Davis, Mike. 2001. Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World. Verso.
Duffield, Mark. 2007. Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples. Polity Press.
Grove, Richard H. 1995. Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860. Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton, Clive. 2017. Defiant Earth: The Fate of Humans in the Anthropocene. Polity Press.
Homer-Dixon, Thomas F. 1999. Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Princeton University Press.
Klein, Naomi. 2014. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate. Simon & Schuster.
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823260.
Latour, Bruno. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Polity Press.
Malm, Andreas. 2016. Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming. Verso.
Mbembe, Achille. 2022. “How to Develop a Planetary Consciousness: A Conversation with Achille Mbembe.” Noema Magazine, January 11, 2022.
McNeill, John R. 2000. Something New Under the Sun: An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World. W. W. Norton.
Moore, Jason W. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. Verso.
Rockström, Johan et al. 2009. “A Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Nature 461 (7263): 472–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a.
Shue, Henry. 1999. “Global Environment and International Inequality.” International Affairs 75 (3): 531–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00092.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton University Press. ———. 2021. “Networked Planetary Governance: An Interview with Anne-Marie Slaughter.” Noema Magazine, August 20, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/amp.2021.141.
Smil, Vaclav. 2017. Energy and Civilization: A History. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262035774.001.0001.
Sörlin, Sverker, and Paul Warde. 2007. “The Problem of the Problem of Environmental History: A Re-Reading of the Field.” Environmental History 12 (1): 107–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/12.1.107.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2012. “Imperative to Re-Imagine the Planet.” In An Aesthetic Education in the Era of Globalization. Harvard University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley.
Whyte, Kyle Powys. 2017. “Indigenous Climate Change Studies: Indigenizing Futures, Decolonizing the Anthropocene.” English Language Notes 55 (1–2): 153–62.
Worster, Donald. 1979. Dust Bowl: The Southern Plains in the 1930s. Oxford University Press.
Wrigley, E. A. 2010. Energy and the English Industrial Revolution. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779619.
Zalasiewicz, Jan et al. 2014. “The Anthropocene Epoch: Scientific Basis and Stratigraphic Assessment.” Geological Society, London, Special Publications 395 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP395.18.