Planetary Constitution
Discussion
Clement Vidal:
"In the Prosocial framework’s core design principles, the first and most fundamental principle is identity: a clear group identity and shared sense of purpose. In Beer’s Viable System Model, this is System 5: the normative authority that defines who the system is, what it values, and how it balances internal and external demands. In living system theory, it is the recognition that the planet is one, and needs to be analyzed and treated as a whole.
The construction of a planetary constitution represents the institutional expression of this identity. The intellectual history of world constitutionalism is longer and richer than is commonly appreciated. The history of world governance (Mazower 2012) spans ideas from Kant’s perpetual peace project, through Bentham’s coinage of the term “international law,” to the post-World War II efforts by some of the finest minds of the century to draft a world constitution (Hutchins et al. 1948). It is sobering that the millions of deaths in two world wars were insufficient to establish a global constitution. Yet one can hope that these efforts set the intellectual foundations for subsequent endeavors, such as the Earth Charter Initiative (Earth Charter Commission 2000).
A planetary constitution must go beyond the Enlightenment tradition of rational, analytical constitutionalism. It must be an evolutionary and metasystemic constitution: one designed to create a complex adaptive system capable of planetary-scale learning and control (Stewart 2018; 2024). Our time is ripe for the creation of a planetary constitution. Summing up what we have reviewed so far, the foundational principles would include: maintaining maximal sovereignty of nation-states, bending sovereignty only for planetary-scale issues (see Blake and Gilman 2024); establishing sovereignty as responsibility rather than mere privilege; implementing mutual coercion mutually agreed upon (Hardin 1968), and a holistic inclusion of the geosphere, biosphere, and noospheres (the holosphere).
The institutional expression of this constitution could take the form of an extended Earth System Council (Global Governance Forum 2025), but I would suggest also a holospheric governance body integrating geosphere, biosphere, and noosphere management. This would represent a third domain of policy, alongside the traditional domestic and foreign policy domains: a global policy focused on the planetary commons."
(https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Planetary_Cooperation_Barrier)