Why Psychopaths Fear Integration
* Article: La métamorphose interdite : pourquoi les psychopathes craignent l’intégration. Boris Sirbey.
Text
Translated by ChatGPT:
* Article: The Forbidden Metamorphosis: Why Psychopaths Fear Integration. By Boris Sirbey.
The Chrysalides of Becoming
The theory of creative minorities, developed notably by sociologist Serge Moscovici, demonstrates that when it comes to major cultural transformations, the majority is not the driving force—it’s the minorities. These creative minorities have one essential characteristic: their marginality in relation to conventional thought systems, which frees them from the blinders that constrain the masses. Their "outsider" status grants them a precious freedom, allowing them to imagine radically different futures while the majority remains trapped in past frameworks, projecting them endlessly onto the future.
In his analysis of civilizational cycles, English historian Arnold Toynbee highlighted a fascinating phenomenon: during great transitions, it is these communities—what he calls "chrysalides"—that play a crucial role as bridges between paradigms. I prefer to call them proto-paradigmatic, as they emerge precisely when the dominant narrative of a civilization begins to unravel, a concept I previously explored in my article The Crisis of Foundational Narratives.
While traditional institutions become increasingly paralyzed by the scale of upheavals—and even violently attack anything that challenges their crumbling narrative—Toynbee explains that these creative communities serve as incubators for nascent civilizations, preserving what is worth saving from the past while shaping the seeds of the future.
Their role is to act as critical archivists, taking a lucid inventory of the successes and failures of the previous paradigm, rewriting the cultural "software" by developing new narratives, values, and worldviews, and reconfiguring the social "hardware" by experimenting with new forms of organization, governance, production, and exchange.
You Are Not Here by Chance
If you’ve read my previous writings and have made it this far in the article, chances are you are part of the conscious minorities I speak of. My writings are deliberately designed as beacons to catch the attention of future scouts—the "happy few," as Stendhal put it.
If you have this particular sensitivity, it is not by accident. Maybe you’ve had a personal experience that shook your comfortable certainties about dominant myths. Perhaps you encountered something that cracked your conventional worldview. Maybe your profession or interests led you to see the limits of our current systems. Or perhaps you simply possess an innate ability to see beyond appearances.
In any case, your lucidity is not just a gift or a curse that condemns you to see what others ignore. It is a responsibility. While the majority remains hypnotized by the final fireworks of a world in decline, you belong to the minority capable of perceiving what is truly at stake.
This awareness is a privilege that demands action. Not in a posture of moral superiority—that would be the most basic trap—but in a call to responsibility. Because if those who are aware remain spectators, who will act?
The Invisible Patterns of History
I do not consider myself a producer of new narratives, but rather someone who reflects on how they can be orchestrated differently. What interests me is the possibility of making visible certain behavioral programs embedded in us for millennia so that we can begin writing a new script.
For this, I have studied macrohistory, a field explored by thinkers like Pitirim Sorokin, Oswald Spengler, Carroll Quigley, Fernand Braudel, Alexandre Deulofeu, and more recently, Jared Diamond, Michel Bauwens, and Marc Halévy. Macrohistory sheds light on how human history is structured by cycles and underlying patterns.
What seems chaotic or unpredictable on the surface actually follows deeply ingrained instructions in our collective unconscious. The crises erupting today and the chain reactions leading to the rise of authoritarianism are not historical anomalies—they are predictable reactions of power systems to their own collapse. Similarly, intensifying identity conflicts, radicalized positions, and messianic movements are classic symptoms of civilizational transition periods.
These patterns act like unconscious programs that reactivate when certain conditions are met. Carl Jung called this the collective unconscious—a deep memory of humanity that retains traces of all our past experiences. That’s why major transformations always produce the same psychological and social reactions.
And if history teaches us anything, it is that these patterns repeat endlessly. That is—until they are decoded.
A Circular Progression
This understanding of historical cycles leads to a crucial question:
* Why do creative minorities, despite their lucidity during major historical transitions, always end up reproducing the same structures of domination and alienation?
The answer lies in ponérology, the study of the origins of evil in societies.
This field reveals a very simple mechanism:
In any human collective, there is always a small percentage (about 1%) of individuals with psychopathic traits. These personalities, incapable of empathy and driven by a compulsive need for control, excel at manipulating social dynamics for their own benefit.
Their strategy? They exploit the emotional weaknesses of the group.
They instinctively identify the 15-20% of people in a society who suffer from unresolved psychological wounds and insecurities. These emotionally vulnerable individuals become their lever for controlling the whole.
To achieve this, they:
- Stoke latent fears
- Create artificial divisions
- Designate scapegoats
- Position themselves as the only ones capable of restoring order—to the chaos they themselves orchestrated.
As a result, the insecure faction of the group, constantly bombarded with fear-based narratives, ends up buying into their worldview of domination and separation. This eventually draws the rest of the community into this toxic dynamic.
Systematic Hijacking
This mechanism explains why the noblest attempts to build a better humanity always seem to be hijacked and turned into their opposite:
- The Christian ideal of universal love led to the Crusades and the Inquisition
- The French Revolution's ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity led to The Terror and the rise of an Empire
- The communist dream of emancipation became totalitarian bureaucracy
- National liberation movements birthed new forms of oppression
Even modern democracy is not immune to this phenomenon. In fact, pathological power structures do not just survive our attempts to transcend them—they recreate themselves through those very attempts.
Breaking the Cycle
To break this cycle, it is not enough to imagine a new paradigm or viable alternatives.
We must understand and neutralize the psychological mechanisms that allow manipulative power structures to regenerate themselves.
This requires a new level of systemic awareness:
- Not just reforming institutions but transforming our collective unconscious
- Not just creating alternative communities but immunizing them against hijacking
If we fail to do this, history will repeat itself once again.
The greatest fear of social manipulators is the rise of individuals and communities capable of integrating the full spectrum of human qualities.
Strength AND love. Power AND compassion. Strategy AND authenticity.
Throughout history, two radically different figures hinted at the same profound truth:
- Jesus Christ (Matthew 10:16): “Be as wise as serpents and as innocent as doves.”
- Machiavelli (The Prince): A leader must be both a lion and a fox—strong enough to defend, cunning enough to anticipate manipulation.
This is the ultimate lesson for future chrysalides:
To be truly transformative, they must integrate power and love — because only by unifying these forces can they neutralize those who seek to divide and control.
The Challenge of Integration
The coming articles will explore how to master this alchemy—a deep systemic transformation that reaches the core of our psyche and reshapes our relationship to power.
For those who dare embark on this path, the promise is clear:
To become the complete beings that manipulators fear the most."
Text 2
A rewrite with the ecological commons in mind, as provided by Mark Whitaker:
""The early Christians, in the catacombs of Rome, developed communities of extraordinary spiritual and relational richness [or in their health-conscious hospitals or regional opposition to roman taxation by flight to the mountains or underground in cave communities in Cappadocia]. In the medieval Balkans, the Bogomils developed egalitarian models based on sharing and non-violence [protecting their lands and regions as their own against the Roman Empire or the Islamic empires together], later inspiring the Cathars in Occitania [that were against papal tithes and wanted priestly autonomy for their zones of self-elected priests in this very rural frontier zone of 'proper' France that only existed far northward at the time (look up maps of what France was at this time--it is really small and north oriented and does not really have territory in 'south of France' yet at all.]. The Sufis created circles of wisdom and poetry in the very heart of the darkest periods of the Middle East [and still to this day are very ecologically regionalized in the marginal ecological zones of northwest India where they came from, where they felt such ecological pressures more strongly than most because of it]. Buddhist communities in [ecologically marginal] Tibet [on the edges of empires in the mountains] preserved for centuries practices of compassion and high consciousness [that were invented in the river valleys below and yet later co-opted below the Himalayas to support hierarchical caste conscious cultures once more]. The Doukhobors in Russia kept alive ideals of peace and respect for life in the face of tsarist persecution [well, no, not really, most just escaped and went to underpopulated Ukraine originally, or later to underpopulated Canada to protect themselves in fresh ecolgoically-isolated zones to avoid repression of their spirituality:
["....In 1802, Tsar Alexander I encouraged the resettlement of religious minorities to the "Milky Waters" (Molochnye Vody) region around the Molochnaya River around Melitopol in modern-day southern Ukraine. This was motivated by the desire to quickly populate the rich steppe lands on the north shore of the Black and Azov Seas, and to prevent the "heretics" from contaminating the population of the heartland with their ideas. Many Doukhobors, as well as Mennonites from Prussia [Mennonites are the "Amish" in the USA, by the way, so many Mennonites fled to the UK colonial territorial frontiers of Pennsylvania and its religious freedom as well] ,accepted the Emperor's offer and travelled to the Molochnaya from other provinces of the Empire over the next 20 years...They are known for their pacifism and tradition of oral history, hymn-singing, and verse. They reject the Russian Orthodox priesthood and associated rituals, believing that personal revelation is more important than the Bible. Facing persecution by the Russian government for their nonorthodox beliefs, many migrated to Canada between 1899 and 1938, where most of them reside as of 2023.[6]"....variously portrayed as "folk-Protestants", Spiritual Christians, sectarians, and heretics. Among their core beliefs is the rejection of materialism. They also reject the Russian Orthodox priesthood, the use of icons, and all associated church rituals. Doukhobors believe the Bible alone is not enough to reach divine revelation[7] and that doctrinal conflicts can interfere with their faith. Biblical teachings are evident in some published Doukhobor psalms, hymns, and beliefs. Since arriving in Canada, parts of the Old Testament, but more profoundly the New Testament, were at the core of most Doukhobor beliefs.have a history dating back to at least 1701 (though some scholars suspect the group has earlier origins).[8] Doukhobors traditionally lived in their own villages and practiced communal living. The name Doukhobors, meaning "Spirit-wrestlers", derives from a slur made by the Russian Orthodox Church that was subsequently embraced by the group.[9] Before 1886, the Doukhobors had a series of leaders. The origin of the Doukhobors is uncertain; they first appear in first written records from 1701."