Philippe Aigrain on Informational Capitalism

From P2P Foundation
Revision as of 14:40, 23 April 2022 by unknown (talk) (Created page with " '''* Article: Philippe Aigrain, Le capitalisme informationnel : modes d’analyse et de régulation. Introductory conference to the conference cycle organized by the Temps N...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

* Article: Philippe Aigrain, Le capitalisme informationnel : modes d’analyse et de régulation. Introductory conference to the conference cycle organized by the Temps Nouveaux foundation on the Economy of the Information and Knowledge Society, 6 Dec. 2005

URL = http://paigrain.debatpublic.net/docs/pha-tn-capinfo.pdf


Summary

From the Reading Notes of Michel Bauwens, 2006:

Aigrain distinguishes two different interpretations of 'informational capitalism':

 - 1) those who see it as a phase of capitalism (Castells, Gorz)
   

- 2) those who see it as one of the tendencies within it

PA is against economistic interpretations.

- For example, though agriculture only represents 2% of GDP and 5% of the workforce (EU), one hundred percent of the people are still eating and the total domination by the agro-industrial model is still being resisted.


The key to the higher profitability of the info sector is "the intensity and the globality of its monopoly on the reproduction of information". The higher profitability of the sector then leads to imitation strategies which can be very destructive, see for example the Enron case.


There are structural weaknesses involved in this transition:

- 1) the artificial nature of these monopolies

- 2) the innovation-restrictive nature of IP

- 3) the necessary universalisation is sometimes difficult to achieve (piracy)


Aigrain proposes a double strategy:

- 1) de-solvabilisation of those forces relying on artificial monopolies

- 2) solvabilisation of strategies based on common goods


Four Strategies for the 'Solvabilisation' of Common Goods

But how to achieve this 'solvabilisation' ? Philippe Aigrain proposes FOUR STRATEGIES:

   - I. Recognition of common goods as positive rights
   - II. Refusing formats which prohibit the constitution of common goods
   - III. Pragmatic approaches for the rest of the IP universe (limited duration, etc...)
   - IV. Reconstruction of the political control on the speciaized agencies


I. TWO POLES IN FINANCING