Commodification of Information Commons: Difference between revisions
(Created page with " * Article: The Commodification of Information Commons. By Primavera De Filippi and Miguel Said Vieira. URL = http://biogov.uclouvain.be/iasc/doc/full%20papers/De%20Filippi%20-%...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''* Article: The Commodification of Information Commons. By Primavera De Filippi and Miguel Said Vieira.''' | |||
URL = http://biogov.uclouvain.be/iasc/doc/full%20papers/De%20Filippi%20-%20Said%20Vieira.pdf | |||
=Abstract | |||
"Internet and digital technologies allowed for the emergence of new modes of production | |||
Internet and digital technologies allowed for the emergence of new modes of production | |||
involving cooperation and collaboration amongst peers (peer-production) and oriented towards | involving cooperation and collaboration amongst peers (peer-production) and oriented towards | ||
the maximization of the common good—as opposed to the maximization of profits. To ensure | the maximization of the common good—as opposed to the maximization of profits. To ensure | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
under a specific regime that prevents anyone from subsequently turning it into a commodity (the | under a specific regime that prevents anyone from subsequently turning it into a commodity (the | ||
regime of information commons). | regime of information commons). | ||
Although they cannot be commodified, information commons can nonetheless be exploited by | Although they cannot be commodified, information commons can nonetheless be exploited by | ||
the market economy. Indeed, since they have been made available for use by anyone, large | the market economy. Indeed, since they have been made available for use by anyone, large | ||
| Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
communities should rely on decentralized platforms based on peer-to-peer architectures— | communities should rely on decentralized platforms based on peer-to-peer architectures— | ||
thereby escaping from the centralized control of large service providers while nonetheless | thereby escaping from the centralized control of large service providers while nonetheless | ||
preserving the autonomy of the commons they produce. | preserving the autonomy of the commons they produce." | ||
[[Category:Commons]] | |||
[[Category:P2P Theory]] | |||
[[Category:IP]] | |||
Revision as of 08:17, 5 September 2012
* Article: The Commodification of Information Commons. By Primavera De Filippi and Miguel Said Vieira.
URL = http://biogov.uclouvain.be/iasc/doc/full%20papers/De%20Filippi%20-%20Said%20Vieira.pdf
=Abstract
"Internet and digital technologies allowed for the emergence of new modes of production involving cooperation and collaboration amongst peers (peer-production) and oriented towards the maximization of the common good—as opposed to the maximization of profits. To ensure that content will always remain available to the public, the output of production is often released under a specific regime that prevents anyone from subsequently turning it into a commodity (the regime of information commons).
Although they cannot be commodified, information commons can nonetheless be exploited by the market economy. Indeed, since they have been made available for use by anyone, large Internet service providers can indirectly benefit from the commons by capturing the value derived from it. While this is not a problem as such, problems arise when the exploitation of the commons by one agent is likely to preclude others from doing the same—often as a result of commodification. This is especially true in the context of cloud computing, where the content holder has become as powerful, if not more powerful than the copyright owner. Nowadays, regardless of their legal status, information commons are increasingly controlled by large corporations who can precisely define the manner in which they can be used or accessed. Digital communities need to be aware of these risks. In order to reduce the likelihood of commodification, but still benefit from the advantages offered by cloud computing, digital communities should rely on decentralized platforms based on peer-to-peer architectures— thereby escaping from the centralized control of large service providers while nonetheless preserving the autonomy of the commons they produce."