Partner State: Difference between revisions
(Created page with ' '''= the Partner State is the concept whereby public authorities play a sustaining role in the 'direct creation of value by civil society', i.e. sustains and promotes commons-ba...') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''= the Partner State is the concept whereby public authorities play a sustaining role in the 'direct creation of value by civil society', i.e. sustains and promotes commons-based [[Peer Production]]''' | '''= the Partner State is the concept whereby public authorities play a sustaining role in the 'direct creation of value by civil society', i.e. sustains and promotes commons-based [[Peer Production]]''' | ||
| Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
of new commons by | of new commons by | ||
- (co-) management of complexe resource | - (co-) management of complexe resource systems which are not limited to | ||
local boundaries or specific communities (manager and partner | local boundaries or specific communities (as manager and partner) | ||
- survey of rules (chartas) to care for the commons (mediator or judge) | - survey of rules (chartas) to care for the commons (mediator or judge) | ||
Revision as of 03:08, 7 September 2009
= the Partner State is the concept whereby public authorities play a sustaining role in the 'direct creation of value by civil society', i.e. sustains and promotes commons-based Peer Production
Discussion
Silke Helfrich
"For me the role of the state is at least fourfold:
not only
- to stop enclosures, but to trigger the production/construction of new commons by
- (co-) management of complexe resource systems which are not limited to local boundaries or specific communities (as manager and partner)
- survey of rules (chartas) to care for the commons (mediator or judge)
- kicking of or providing incentives for commoners governing their commons - here the point is to design intelligent rules which automatically protect the commons, like the GPL does (facilitator)" (email, September 2009)