Coliberation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If we accept [[Equipotentiality]] as the basic worldview and principle explaining peer to peer dynamics, then Coliberation is the active ethical principle derived from it. | If we accept [[Equipotentiality]] as the basic worldview and principle explaining peer to peer dynamics, then Coliberation is the active ethical principle derived from it. | ||
| Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Relationality]] | [[Category:Relationality]] | ||
[[Category:Facilitation]] | |||
Revision as of 12:21, 19 December 2007
If we accept Equipotentiality as the basic worldview and principle explaining peer to peer dynamics, then Coliberation is the active ethical principle derived from it.
It signifies both the shared transcendence of the group, and the practice of designing social processes so each of us can be the condition and enabler of the other participants reaching their highest potential.
Discussion
Bernie DeKoven [1]:
"CoLiberation is what happens when we work extraordinarily well together. Like on a basketball team or in an orchestra, when we actually experience ourselves sharing in something bigger than any one who is present. This is what I call the experience of the "Big WE." It's a corollary to the "Big ME" experience of self-transcendence. If the Big ME is the "peak experience," CoLiberation or the Big WE, is like becoming a whole mountain range." (http://deepfun.com/colib.htm)