Introduction to Gadamer: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
unknown (talk)
(Created page with " '''* - Book: Gadamer. By Patricia A. Johnson. Wadsworth,''' URL = =Summary= From the reading notes of Michel Bauwens, 2006 Gadamer, in his analysis of art and aesthetic...")
 
unknown (talk)
Line 15: Line 15:
Understanding is a historically effected event. To be historical means that knowledge of oneself can never be complete. We also speak from a situation and cannot go outside it to see ourselves from an objective distance. In the first two parts of Truth and Method, dealing with aesthetic and historical consciousness, Gadamer aims to overcome the alienation of Enlightenment thinking by overcoming the absolute subject-object divide by a relative one. We are never really separate from our objects and from the past, we are constantly re-mediating these meanings as part of a spatial and temporal community. But the medium of this ongoing dialogue is language, and it is this that he examines in the third part of the book.
Understanding is a historically effected event. To be historical means that knowledge of oneself can never be complete. We also speak from a situation and cannot go outside it to see ourselves from an objective distance. In the first two parts of Truth and Method, dealing with aesthetic and historical consciousness, Gadamer aims to overcome the alienation of Enlightenment thinking by overcoming the absolute subject-object divide by a relative one. We are never really separate from our objects and from the past, we are constantly re-mediating these meanings as part of a spatial and temporal community. But the medium of this ongoing dialogue is language, and it is this that he examines in the third part of the book.


His essential thesis is: language is NOT a tool, but the medium in which we live (like the air we breathe). Understanding, i.e. interpretation, is finding the 'right language' to appropriate (make into one's own), the object of meaning.
His essential thesis is: language is NOT a tool, but the medium in which we live (like the air we breathe). Understanding, i.e. interpretation, is finding the 'right language' to appropriate (make into one's own), the object of meaning. In the context of this concept rehabilitation, he notes that the Greeks made a false start with Plato suggesting that Craetylus that language was indeed a tool, but finds hope in the Christian notion of the  Incarnation (the world becoming flesh but remaining the word) and sees medieval innovations that go in the right direction. They saw language as having the structure of an event (rather than an image or sign).
 
It is language, the ability to name things, which creates the world, and our capacity to take distance from it. "Language enables the human relation to the world to be variable."


[[Category:Bauwens Reading Notes Project]]
[[Category:Bauwens Reading Notes Project]]
[[Category:Intelligence]]
[[Category:Intelligence]]

Revision as of 06:45, 24 September 2021

* - Book: Gadamer. By Patricia A. Johnson. Wadsworth,

URL =


Summary

From the reading notes of Michel Bauwens, 2006

Gadamer, in his analysis of art and aesthetic consciousness in 'Truth and Method', shows that the experience of art invalidates the subject-object distance, i.e. the "inadequacy of a dualistic self-understanding that places people at an epistemological distance from the world in which they live. He develops a similar critique of historical consciousness, as creating an object in time: "the essential nature of the historical spirit consists not in the restoration of the past, but in the thoughtful mediation with contemporary life.

Gadamer also rehabilitates prejudice: such pre-understanding (f.e. of the student in the teacher or of the child in the parent) is essential to understanding, which is to be thought less as a subjective act, than as participating in an event of tradition.

Understanding is a historically effected event. To be historical means that knowledge of oneself can never be complete. We also speak from a situation and cannot go outside it to see ourselves from an objective distance. In the first two parts of Truth and Method, dealing with aesthetic and historical consciousness, Gadamer aims to overcome the alienation of Enlightenment thinking by overcoming the absolute subject-object divide by a relative one. We are never really separate from our objects and from the past, we are constantly re-mediating these meanings as part of a spatial and temporal community. But the medium of this ongoing dialogue is language, and it is this that he examines in the third part of the book.

His essential thesis is: language is NOT a tool, but the medium in which we live (like the air we breathe). Understanding, i.e. interpretation, is finding the 'right language' to appropriate (make into one's own), the object of meaning. In the context of this concept rehabilitation, he notes that the Greeks made a false start with Plato suggesting that Craetylus that language was indeed a tool, but finds hope in the Christian notion of the Incarnation (the world becoming flesh but remaining the word) and sees medieval innovations that go in the right direction. They saw language as having the structure of an event (rather than an image or sign).

It is language, the ability to name things, which creates the world, and our capacity to take distance from it. "Language enables the human relation to the world to be variable."