Steady-State Economy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= a P2P-informed approach in which non-human life, future generations, and 'nature' are taken as partners, from which no more can be taken, than its ability to regenerate itself. | |||
=Definition= | |||
'''a "steady state" economy = an economy a roughly constant output of goods and services''' | '''a "steady state" economy = an economy a roughly constant output of goods and services''' | ||
or | |||
'''A steady state economy is "a sustainable economy with stabilized population and consumption."''' | |||
| Line 14: | Line 22: | ||
=More Information= | =More Information= | ||
Casse, the Center for the Advancement of a Steady State Economy, is an advocacy organisation promoting its principles, see at http://www.steadystate.org/ | |||
See our entry on [[Abundance vs. Scarcity]] | See our entry on [[Abundance vs. Scarcity]] | ||
| Line 24: | Line 33: | ||
[[Category:Policy]] | [[Category:Policy]] | ||
[[Category:Money]] | |||
Revision as of 13:17, 15 May 2007
= a P2P-informed approach in which non-human life, future generations, and 'nature' are taken as partners, from which no more can be taken, than its ability to regenerate itself.
Definition
a "steady state" economy = an economy a roughly constant output of goods and services
or
A steady state economy is "a sustainable economy with stabilized population and consumption."
Discussion
Quoted in an interview with Thomas Homer-Dixon, author of the book. The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, creativity and the renewal of civilization .
New Scientist: "Isn't there another problem, in that solutions may run counter to our economic model, which relies on perpetual growth?
THD: Yes. In rich countries we need to figure out if there are feasible alternatives to our hidebound commitment to economic growth, because it's increasingly clear that endless material growth is incompatible with the long-term viability of Earth's environment. We need to know what a "steady state" economy - one with a roughly constant output of goods and services - might look like. What economic and ethical values might it have? Could it include some (albeit radically transformed) version of market capitalism? Would it be compatible with personal and social liberty? How would the political and social conflicts that would inevitably arise if there were no growth be resolved?"
More Information
Casse, the Center for the Advancement of a Steady State Economy, is an advocacy organisation promoting its principles, see at http://www.steadystate.org/
See our entry on Abundance vs. Scarcity
A related movement is the Decroissance Movement which stresses that not only do we need a steady -state economy, but that we need "ungrowth" to arrive at sustainable levels of resource depletion.