Market Socialism: Difference between revisions
m (Market Socialism' moved to Market Socialism: correct title) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Summary from the Wikipedia article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_socialism | Summary from the Wikipedia article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_socialism | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
Proponents of market socialism include economist [http://pantheon.yale.edu/~jer39/ John Roemer] and philosopher [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Schweickart David Schweickart], whose version of market socialism is called " Economic Democracy". | Proponents of market socialism include economist [http://pantheon.yale.edu/~jer39/ John Roemer] and philosopher [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Schweickart David Schweickart], whose version of market socialism is called " Economic Democracy". | ||
=Versions of Market Socialism= | |||
==David Schweickart== | |||
From http://www.solidarityeconomy.net/2007/03/02/economic-democracy-vs-parecon/: | |||
"I argue that “the market” is not in fact a unitary mechanism, but should be disaggregated into three markets: a market for goods and services, a labor market and a capital market. I argue further that it is those latter two markets–the labor and capital markets–that do the most damage under capitalism and hence need to be replaced. I argue that a competitive market for goods and services, while not wholly benign, is vastly preferable to alternative allocative mechanism, whether they be centralized planning a la the Soviet union or the decentralized, participatory planning of Albert and Hahnel. | |||
Let me set out the basic institutional structures of what I call [[Economic Democracy]], a model of socialism I consider to be vastly superior to both capitalism and the Soviet model of centralized, command socialism. And to Parecon. The basic model has three fundamental features. | |||
- Enterprises are governed democratically by their workers. Ultimate authority rests with the workforce, one person, one vote. Workplace democracy is the replacement for the capitalist labor market | |||
- Enterprises compete for customers in a relatively free market. That is to say, the market for goods and services is carried over from capitalism. | |||
- Capital markets are replaced by what I call “social control of investment.” Funds for investment are generated from a capital-assets tax, a flat rate tax imposed on all enterprises–not from the private savings of wealthy individuals. These funds are allocated, first to regions on a per-capita basis, and then to public investment banks in the regions, which are responsible for allocating these funds for | |||
a. public capital projects, | |||
b. existing enterprises wanting to expand production or upgrade their technology and | |||
c. individuals wanting to start up a new enterprises. | |||
I propose several other features in what I call the “expanded model” of Economic Democracy. I won’t discuss them here, but for the sake of completeness, let me note that Economic Democracy would also include | |||
- The government acting as employer-of-last resort | |||
- A quasi-capitalist sector comprised of small businesses and perhaps a sector of entrepreneurial capitalist firms, | |||
- A policy of “socialist protectionism” that blocks low-wage competition from poor countries but rebates the tariff proceeds to those countries. | |||
I have argued at length, in various books and articles, that such an economic structure would be at least as efficient as capitalism, more rational in its growth, more egalitarian, better able to cope with the ecological challenges we face, and vastly more democratic." | |||
(http://www.solidarityeconomy.net/2007/03/02/economic-democracy-vs-parecon/) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 50: | ||
* After Capitalism (Rowman and Littlefield, 2002) - ISBN | * After Capitalism (Rowman and Littlefield, 2002) - ISBN | ||
Revision as of 10:36, 4 March 2007
Summary from the Wikipedia article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_socialism
"Market Socialism is an economic system in which the means of production are owned either by the state or by the workers in each company (meaning in general that "profits" in each company are distributed between them: profit sharing) and the production is not centrally planned but mediated through the market . Its central idea is that the market is not a mechanism exclusive to capitalism and that it is fully compatible with collective worker ownership over the means of production — which is one of the fundamental principles of socialism.
Proponents of market socialism argue that it combines the advantages of a market economy with those of socialist economics. The theory is fundamentally contradictory to orthodox Marxism.
Proponents of market socialism include economist John Roemer and philosopher David Schweickart, whose version of market socialism is called " Economic Democracy".
Versions of Market Socialism
David Schweickart
From http://www.solidarityeconomy.net/2007/03/02/economic-democracy-vs-parecon/:
"I argue that “the market” is not in fact a unitary mechanism, but should be disaggregated into three markets: a market for goods and services, a labor market and a capital market. I argue further that it is those latter two markets–the labor and capital markets–that do the most damage under capitalism and hence need to be replaced. I argue that a competitive market for goods and services, while not wholly benign, is vastly preferable to alternative allocative mechanism, whether they be centralized planning a la the Soviet union or the decentralized, participatory planning of Albert and Hahnel.
Let me set out the basic institutional structures of what I call Economic Democracy, a model of socialism I consider to be vastly superior to both capitalism and the Soviet model of centralized, command socialism. And to Parecon. The basic model has three fundamental features.
- Enterprises are governed democratically by their workers. Ultimate authority rests with the workforce, one person, one vote. Workplace democracy is the replacement for the capitalist labor market
- Enterprises compete for customers in a relatively free market. That is to say, the market for goods and services is carried over from capitalism.
- Capital markets are replaced by what I call “social control of investment.” Funds for investment are generated from a capital-assets tax, a flat rate tax imposed on all enterprises–not from the private savings of wealthy individuals. These funds are allocated, first to regions on a per-capita basis, and then to public investment banks in the regions, which are responsible for allocating these funds for
a. public capital projects,
b. existing enterprises wanting to expand production or upgrade their technology and
c. individuals wanting to start up a new enterprises.
I propose several other features in what I call the “expanded model” of Economic Democracy. I won’t discuss them here, but for the sake of completeness, let me note that Economic Democracy would also include
- The government acting as employer-of-last resort
- A quasi-capitalist sector comprised of small businesses and perhaps a sector of entrepreneurial capitalist firms,
- A policy of “socialist protectionism” that blocks low-wage competition from poor countries but rebates the tariff proceeds to those countries.
I have argued at length, in various books and articles, that such an economic structure would be at least as efficient as capitalism, more rational in its growth, more egalitarian, better able to cope with the ecological challenges we face, and vastly more democratic." (http://www.solidarityeconomy.net/2007/03/02/economic-democracy-vs-parecon/)
Key Books to Read
- After Capitalism (Rowman and Littlefield, 2002) - ISBN
- Market Socialism: The Debate Among Socialists, coauthored with Bertell Ollman, Hillel Ticktin and James Lawler (Routledge, 1998)
- Against Capitalism (Cambridge University Press, 1993) [Spanish translation, 1997; Chinese translation, 2003])
- Capitalism or Worker Control? An Ethical and Economic Appraisal (Praeger, 1980)
See also the book on Self-Managed Market Socialism