Four Internet Historiographical Ideologies: Difference between revisions
(Created page with " See for full treatment: Internet - History by Adam Fish. =Citation= Adam Fish: '''Each make impressive claims but my point is to consider these statements as ideologi...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
See for full treatment: [[Internet - History]] by Adam Fish. | See for full treatment: [[Internet - History]] by Adam Fish. | ||
Dale Carrico: | |||
“Adam Fish helpfully summarizes libertechian, technoprogressive, Great Man, and peer-to-peer narratives of the creation of the internet.” [http://amormundi.blogspot.com/2013/01/internet-fabulization.html] | |||
Source: http://mediacultures.org/post/40250944767/the-internet-who-built-that | |||
=Citation= | =Citation= | ||
| Line 9: | Line 14: | ||
'''Each make impressive claims but my point is to consider these statements as ideologies that reveal as they attempt to conceal political persuasions in historical revisions. These four internet historiographical ideologies can be traced back to classical Western liberalism and its emphasis on freedom of the corporation ([[Technolibertarianism]]), the state in securing and defending freedom and citizen responsibility ([[Technoprogressivism]]),the rugged individual unencumbered by tradition ([[Technoindividualism]]), and the collaborative citizen public ([[Technoidealism]]). This overview of internet historiographical revisionism illustrates how technology gets enculturated—technologies are already always enculturated—but an extra-palimpsest of ideology is spread across the internet history by these four positions.''' | '''Each make impressive claims but my point is to consider these statements as ideologies that reveal as they attempt to conceal political persuasions in historical revisions. These four internet historiographical ideologies can be traced back to classical Western liberalism and its emphasis on freedom of the corporation ([[Technolibertarianism]]), the state in securing and defending freedom and citizen responsibility ([[Technoprogressivism]]),the rugged individual unencumbered by tradition ([[Technoindividualism]]), and the collaborative citizen public ([[Technoidealism]]). This overview of internet historiographical revisionism illustrates how technology gets enculturated—technologies are already always enculturated—but an extra-palimpsest of ideology is spread across the internet history by these four positions.''' | ||
(http://mediacultures.org/post/40250944767/the-internet-who-built-that) | (http://mediacultures.org/post/40250944767/the-internet-who-built-that) | ||
=More Information= | |||
# [[Technolibertarianism]] | |||
# [[Technoprogressivism]] | |||
# [[Technoindividualism]] | |||
# [[Technoidealism]] | |||
Revision as of 05:15, 20 January 2013
See for full treatment: Internet - History by Adam Fish.
Dale Carrico:
“Adam Fish helpfully summarizes libertechian, technoprogressive, Great Man, and peer-to-peer narratives of the creation of the internet.” [1]
Source: http://mediacultures.org/post/40250944767/the-internet-who-built-that
Citation
Adam Fish:
Each make impressive claims but my point is to consider these statements as ideologies that reveal as they attempt to conceal political persuasions in historical revisions. These four internet historiographical ideologies can be traced back to classical Western liberalism and its emphasis on freedom of the corporation (Technolibertarianism), the state in securing and defending freedom and citizen responsibility (Technoprogressivism),the rugged individual unencumbered by tradition (Technoindividualism), and the collaborative citizen public (Technoidealism). This overview of internet historiographical revisionism illustrates how technology gets enculturated—technologies are already always enculturated—but an extra-palimpsest of ideology is spread across the internet history by these four positions. (http://mediacultures.org/post/40250944767/the-internet-who-built-that)