Category talk:Peerproduction: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(PR comment)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
--[[User:Poor Richard|Poor Richard]] ([[User talk:Poor Richard|talk]]) 20:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC) ---
--[[User:Poor Richard|Poor Richard]] ([[User talk:Poor Richard|talk]]) 20:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC) ---
I like this presentation of the characteristics of peerproduction. The "beyond classes" etc. is a good list and the list of practices is very inclusive yet very concise. I suggest adding the term "composabilty" in the item on modularity, and something about subsidiarity in reference to hierarchy. Perhaps it could be clarified under what terms and conditions hierarchy and meritocracy may play roles. I wonder if it might also be useful to work in something about proportionality, checks and balances, and conflict resolution. --- --[[User:Poor Richard|Poor Richard]] ([[User talk:Poor Richard|talk]]) 20:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
I like this presentation of the characteristics of peerproduction. The "beyond classes" etc. is a good list and the list of practices is very inclusive yet very concise. I suggest adding the term "composabilty" in the item on modularity, and something about subsidiarity in reference to hierarchy. Perhaps it could be clarified under what terms and conditions hierarchy and meritocracy may play roles. I wonder if it might also be useful to work in something about proportionality, checks and balances, and conflict resolution. --- --[[User:Poor Richard|Poor Richard]] ([[User talk:Poor Richard|talk]]) 20:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
**
I would suggest doing this in the 1-14 listing, by creating additional "see also" references in the appropriate places. Do you have texts to create an entry on composability?
--[[User:Mbauwens|MIchel Bauwens]] ([[User talk:Mbauwens|talk]]) 19:10, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:10, 4 October 2012

--Poor Richard (talk) 20:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC) --- I like this presentation of the characteristics of peerproduction. The "beyond classes" etc. is a good list and the list of practices is very inclusive yet very concise. I suggest adding the term "composabilty" in the item on modularity, and something about subsidiarity in reference to hierarchy. Perhaps it could be clarified under what terms and conditions hierarchy and meritocracy may play roles. I wonder if it might also be useful to work in something about proportionality, checks and balances, and conflict resolution. --- --Poor Richard (talk) 20:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

I would suggest doing this in the 1-14 listing, by creating additional "see also" references in the appropriate places. Do you have texts to create an entry on composability?

--MIchel Bauwens (talk) 19:10, 4 October 2012 (UTC)