P2P Wiki: Difference between revisions
(Minor link corrections from last edit) |
(Reorganized text and headings, revisioned and added content.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==What's a P2P | ==What's a P2P Wiki== | ||
A peer-to-peer wiki is a serverless decentralized wiki, hosted, edited, administrated and operated by its users. Imagine git (or another DCVS) but with asynchronous and ''realtime'' text editing, a p2p conflict management system, and a user-friendly interface. P2P | A peer-to-peer wiki is a serverless decentralized wiki, hosted, edited, administrated and operated by its users. Imagine git (or another DCVS) but with asynchronous and ''realtime'' text editing, a p2p conflict management system, and a user-friendly interface. P2P Wikis redefine how we publish, edit, host and administrate text document type pages (among other things) on the internet. | ||
==Differences to existing text collaboration systems== | |||
==Differences to | * Realtime or asynchronous (Online and offline editing). | ||
* Realtime or asynchronous | * Full revision history with playback. | ||
* Full revision history with playback | * Merging, forking, branching of text/documents; allows a panarchical political meta-structure,like in the (FLOSS) software world. | ||
* Merging, forking, branching text ( | * P2P conflict management. | ||
* | * True P2P Architecture | ||
* P2P | |||
====The Blogosphere and Political Economy==== | |||
Blogs (and personal websites) generally administer, edited and publish content autocratically--a blogger often controls the servers too. While bloggers do add p2p or quasi-democratic elements to a blog, like p2p comment administering, they largely don't adopt an overall cooperative-type political structure. | |||
Wikis are generally administered more democratically. And (large ones) are funded and operated by quasi-democratic non-profit foundations. Despite this, because of the centralized nature of current wiki technologies, large Wikis in particular, have somewhat autocratic political structure. This is a consequence of the structure of the web and internet, other things, as it stands today. P2P Wikis change that. It's political meta-structure is analogous to a [panarchy]. | |||
Wikis | ==Why P2P Wikis?== | ||
You can have a private page on say "Abraham Lincoln" solely expressing your viewpoint; analogous to a hermetic autocracy. You can publicly share the page and only give write access to a small group of known like-minded peers; that's like tribal band-sized anarchy. Branching, merging, or forking of content allows many types of social organization ecologies. | |||
====The Blogosphere's Enclosing of the Knowledge Commons==== | |||
The conceptualization and crediting ideas and insights to one's name, accrues status, social recognition/reputational benefits to oneself. As this process accumulates, one is eventually regarded as an expert, guru or authority. A mass following or personality cult can develop around the individual. This encloses the knowledge commons. And it rearranges political, economic and cultural organization for the interests of individuals, who often copyright the work. This is a process that largely goes unnoticed. | |||
Wiki's see knowledge differently. While a single individual can make large and unequal contributions relative to others, the work is ultimately credited and possessed (or owned) by all--copylefted with collectively possesion. | |||
====Blogs and the Self-Help World: A Case Study of Political Enclosure==== | |||
The personal development, self-help, new age and lifestyle design field is broadly organized around individuals' books and websites/blogs. That creates the grounds for a meta-structure of competing autocracies in that world. It commonly revolved around popular figures with mass following of highly emulative and adulative followers. Popular figures derive power primarily from perceived expertise and knowledge. But both followers and the leader can't see the socio-political-cultural implications of a personality cult type structure. In fact, it they believe their social relations are completely democratic. In reality it is part authoritarian. #[http://p2pfoundation.net/Spiritual_Projection_and_Authority] #[http://p2pfoundation.net/Authoritarian_Blight_in_Spirituality] | |||
==Approaches to creating a P2P Wiki== | ==Approaches to creating a P2P Wiki== | ||
| Line 27: | Line 30: | ||
One approach to doing this is using a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_revision_control distributed revision control system] as a backend of the wiki, in peer-to-peer style. With this approach, there is no central store of the wiki's content; instead, every user can keep a complete copy of the wiki locally, and the software handles merging and propagating of changes when they are made. This is the approach taken by the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ikiwiki ikiwiki] engine (which can use the distributed revision control system [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_%28software%29Git] as its back-end), and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_Co-op Code Co-op] (a distributed revision control system that includes a wiki component). | One approach to doing this is using a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_revision_control distributed revision control system] as a backend of the wiki, in peer-to-peer style. With this approach, there is no central store of the wiki's content; instead, every user can keep a complete copy of the wiki locally, and the software handles merging and propagating of changes when they are made. This is the approach taken by the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ikiwiki ikiwiki] engine (which can use the distributed revision control system [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_%28software%29Git] as its back-end), and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_Co-op Code Co-op] (a distributed revision control system that includes a wiki component). | ||
There | There's research on decentralized hosting of Wikipedia. And there are other angles to attack the problem: modifying Apache (formerly Google Wave) or web apps like Etherpad, and desktop text editing software like [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SubEthaEdit SubEthaEdit]. None of these technologies integrate all the features of a p2p wiki, as of yet. | ||
===Projects=== | |||
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ikiwiki A serverless wiki] | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ikiwiki A serverless wiki] | ||
*[https://github.com/github/gollum Gollum, a git wiki] | *[https://github.com/github/gollum Gollum, a git wiki] | ||
| Line 37: | Line 40: | ||
*[http://bouillon.math.usu.ru/index.html%3Fp=128.html Project Boullion, an Apache Wave like project] | *[http://bouillon.math.usu.ru/index.html%3Fp=128.html Project Boullion, an Apache Wave like project] | ||
===External Links/Discussions === | |||
*[http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/PeerToPeerWiki Meatball on P2P wikis] | *[http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/PeerToPeerWiki Meatball Wiki on P2P wikis] | ||
*[http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DistributedWiki C2 wiki's article and discussion] | *[http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DistributedWiki C2 wiki's article and discussion] | ||
*[http://www.globule.org/publi/DWECWH_webist2007.html Research paper on decentralizing Wikipedia] | *[http://www.globule.org/publi/DWECWH_webist2007.html Research paper on decentralizing Wikipedia] | ||
Revision as of 02:03, 12 July 2012
What's a P2P Wiki
A peer-to-peer wiki is a serverless decentralized wiki, hosted, edited, administrated and operated by its users. Imagine git (or another DCVS) but with asynchronous and realtime text editing, a p2p conflict management system, and a user-friendly interface. P2P Wikis redefine how we publish, edit, host and administrate text document type pages (among other things) on the internet.
Differences to existing text collaboration systems
- Realtime or asynchronous (Online and offline editing).
- Full revision history with playback.
- Merging, forking, branching of text/documents; allows a panarchical political meta-structure,like in the (FLOSS) software world.
- P2P conflict management.
- True P2P Architecture
The Blogosphere and Political Economy
Blogs (and personal websites) generally administer, edited and publish content autocratically--a blogger often controls the servers too. While bloggers do add p2p or quasi-democratic elements to a blog, like p2p comment administering, they largely don't adopt an overall cooperative-type political structure.
Wikis are generally administered more democratically. And (large ones) are funded and operated by quasi-democratic non-profit foundations. Despite this, because of the centralized nature of current wiki technologies, large Wikis in particular, have somewhat autocratic political structure. This is a consequence of the structure of the web and internet, other things, as it stands today. P2P Wikis change that. It's political meta-structure is analogous to a [panarchy].
Why P2P Wikis?
You can have a private page on say "Abraham Lincoln" solely expressing your viewpoint; analogous to a hermetic autocracy. You can publicly share the page and only give write access to a small group of known like-minded peers; that's like tribal band-sized anarchy. Branching, merging, or forking of content allows many types of social organization ecologies.
The Blogosphere's Enclosing of the Knowledge Commons
The conceptualization and crediting ideas and insights to one's name, accrues status, social recognition/reputational benefits to oneself. As this process accumulates, one is eventually regarded as an expert, guru or authority. A mass following or personality cult can develop around the individual. This encloses the knowledge commons. And it rearranges political, economic and cultural organization for the interests of individuals, who often copyright the work. This is a process that largely goes unnoticed.
Wiki's see knowledge differently. While a single individual can make large and unequal contributions relative to others, the work is ultimately credited and possessed (or owned) by all--copylefted with collectively possesion.
Blogs and the Self-Help World: A Case Study of Political Enclosure
The personal development, self-help, new age and lifestyle design field is broadly organized around individuals' books and websites/blogs. That creates the grounds for a meta-structure of competing autocracies in that world. It commonly revolved around popular figures with mass following of highly emulative and adulative followers. Popular figures derive power primarily from perceived expertise and knowledge. But both followers and the leader can't see the socio-political-cultural implications of a personality cult type structure. In fact, it they believe their social relations are completely democratic. In reality it is part authoritarian. #[1] #[2]
Approaches to creating a P2P Wiki
One approach to doing this is using a distributed revision control system as a backend of the wiki, in peer-to-peer style. With this approach, there is no central store of the wiki's content; instead, every user can keep a complete copy of the wiki locally, and the software handles merging and propagating of changes when they are made. This is the approach taken by the ikiwiki engine (which can use the distributed revision control system [3] as its back-end), and Code Co-op (a distributed revision control system that includes a wiki component).
There's research on decentralized hosting of Wikipedia. And there are other angles to attack the problem: modifying Apache (formerly Google Wave) or web apps like Etherpad, and desktop text editing software like SubEthaEdit. None of these technologies integrate all the features of a p2p wiki, as of yet.
Projects
- A serverless wiki
- Gollum, a git wiki
- Git-Wiki
- DVCS, Fossil has a wiki feature
- Mercurial extension enabling p2p-wiki functions
- Project Boullion, an Apache Wave like project