Computing Regime: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with ' '''= how Protocollary Power is embedded in the very structure of computing, and the social effects it has''' =More Information= * Computing and the Current Crisis: Th...') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''= how [[Protocollary Power]] is embedded in the very structure of computing, and the social effects it has''' | '''= how [[Protocollary Power]] is embedded in the very structure of computing, and the social effects it has''' | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
=More Information= | =More Information= | ||
* [[Computing and the Current Crisis]]: The Significant Role of New Information Technologies in Our Socio-Economic Meltdown David Hakken, tripleC, Vol. 8. No. 2, pp 205-220 [http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/161/193] | * [[Computing and the Current Crisis]]: The Significant Role of New Information Technologies in Our Socio-Economic Meltdown David Hakken, tripleC, Vol. 8. No. 2, pp 205-220 [http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/161/193]: how the current computing regime is responsible for the financial meltdown of 2008 | ||
* Citron, Danielle Keats, [[Technological Due Process]]. U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2007-26; Washington University Law Review, Vol. 85, pp. 1249-1313, 2007. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1012360] | |||
Concepts: | |||
#[[Protocollary Power]] | |||
#[[Architecture of Control]] | |||
#[[Socially Robust and Enduring Computing]] | |||
Revision as of 03:26, 3 September 2010
= how Protocollary Power is embedded in the very structure of computing, and the social effects it has
More Information
- Computing and the Current Crisis: The Significant Role of New Information Technologies in Our Socio-Economic Meltdown David Hakken, tripleC, Vol. 8. No. 2, pp 205-220 [1]: how the current computing regime is responsible for the financial meltdown of 2008
- Citron, Danielle Keats, Technological Due Process. U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2007-26; Washington University Law Review, Vol. 85, pp. 1249-1313, 2007. [2]
Concepts: