Calculation in Kind and Marketless Socialism: Difference between revisions
(Created page with " '''* Article: Calculation in kind and marketless socialism: On Otto Neurath’s utopian economics. Thomas Uebel. Euro. J. History of Economic Thought 15:3 475–501, September 2008''' URL = =Description= From the introduction: "Otto Neurath was not shy to declare himself a utopian thinker. His standing as an economist depends on what one makes of this feature of his thought. Here I shall be attempting an immanent critique, on Neurath’s own terms. Without discus...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''* Article: Calculation in kind and marketless socialism: On Otto Neurath’s utopian economics. Thomas Uebel. Euro. J. History of Economic Thought 15:3 475–501, September 2008''' | '''* Article: Calculation in kind and marketless socialism: On Otto Neurath’s utopian economics. Thomas Uebel. Euro. J. History of Economic Thought 15:3 475–501, September 2008''' | ||
URL = | URL = https://cominsitu.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/calculation-in-kind-and-marketless-socialism-on-otto-neuraths-utopian-economics-uebel2008.pdf | ||
| Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
understood without de-legitimizing the rest of his program." | understood without de-legitimizing the rest of his program." | ||
[[Category:Mutual_Coordination]] | |||
[[Category:Articles]] | |||
[[Category:Utopia]] | [[Category:Utopia]] | ||
Revision as of 20:45, 25 September 2024
* Article: Calculation in kind and marketless socialism: On Otto Neurath’s utopian economics. Thomas Uebel. Euro. J. History of Economic Thought 15:3 475–501, September 2008
Description
From the introduction:
"Otto Neurath was not shy to declare himself a utopian thinker. His standing as an economist depends on what one makes of this feature of his thought. Here I shall be attempting an immanent critique, on Neurath’s own terms.
Without discussing the meaning of utopianism in general, I shall argue that while much of his work in economics amounts to what he called ‘scientific utopianism’ – something he was within his rights to consider part of social-scientific activity – there are also aspects to this work in economics that are utopian in a more problematic sense. I will isolate what these elements are and investigate how, if at all, their presence in Neurath’s thought can be understood without de-legitimizing the rest of his program."